* [linux-safety] [PATCH 1/2] staging: vt6655: Fix alignment in device_main.c
@ 2020-11-23 11:59 Milan Lakhani
2020-11-23 11:59 ` [linux-safety] [PATCH 2/2] staging: vt6655: Correct wrappping in rxtx.c Milan Lakhani
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Milan Lakhani @ 2020-11-23 11:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: forest; +Cc: Milan Lakhani, Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-kernel, linux-safety
Correct alignment to open parenthesis in device_main.c. Reported by
checkpatch.
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Forest Bond <forest@alittletooquiet.net>
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
CC: linux-safety@lists.elisa.tech
Signed-off-by: Milan Lakhani <milan.lakhani@codethink.co.uk>
---
drivers/staging/vt6655/device_main.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6655/device_main.c b/drivers/staging/vt6655/device_main.c
index 9c7d70e..2108ae6 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/vt6655/device_main.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/vt6655/device_main.c
@@ -1077,7 +1077,7 @@ static void vnt_interrupt_process(struct vnt_private *priv)
PSbIsNextTBTTWakeUp((void *)priv);
if ((priv->op_mode == NL80211_IFTYPE_AP ||
- priv->op_mode == NL80211_IFTYPE_ADHOC) &&
+ priv->op_mode == NL80211_IFTYPE_ADHOC) &&
priv->vif->bss_conf.enable_beacon)
MACvOneShotTimer1MicroSec(priv,
(priv->vif->bss_conf.beacon_int -
--
2.7.4
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#186): https://lists.elisa.tech/g/linux-safety/message/186
Mute This Topic: https://lists.elisa.tech/mt/78451463/5278000
Group Owner: linux-safety+owner@lists.elisa.tech
Unsubscribe: https://lists.elisa.tech/g/linux-safety/unsub [linux-safety@archiver.kernel.org]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [linux-safety] [PATCH 2/2] staging: vt6655: Correct wrappping in rxtx.c
2020-11-23 11:59 [linux-safety] [PATCH 1/2] staging: vt6655: Fix alignment in device_main.c Milan Lakhani
@ 2020-11-23 11:59 ` Milan Lakhani
2020-11-23 13:17 ` Lukas Bulwahn
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Milan Lakhani @ 2020-11-23 11:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: forest; +Cc: Milan Lakhani, Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-kernel, linux-safety
Correct line length and alignment in rxtx.c. Reported by checkpatch.
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Forest Bond <forest@alittletooquiet.net>
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
CC: linux-safety@lists.elisa.tech
Signed-off-by: Milan Lakhani <milan.lakhani@codethink.co.uk>
---
drivers/staging/vt6655/rxtx.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6655/rxtx.c b/drivers/staging/vt6655/rxtx.c
index 508e1bd..4073c33 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/vt6655/rxtx.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/vt6655/rxtx.c
@@ -492,14 +492,29 @@ s_uFillDataHead(
pDevice->byTopCCKBasicRate,
PK_TYPE_11B, &buf->b);
/* Get Duration and TimeStamp */
- buf->duration_a = cpu_to_le16((u16)s_uGetDataDuration(pDevice, DATADUR_A, cbFrameLength, byPktType,
- wCurrentRate, bNeedAck, uFragIdx, cbLastFragmentSize, uMACfragNum, byFBOption));
- buf->duration_b = cpu_to_le16((u16)s_uGetDataDuration(pDevice, DATADUR_B, cbFrameLength, PK_TYPE_11B,
- pDevice->byTopCCKBasicRate, bNeedAck, uFragIdx, cbLastFragmentSize, uMACfragNum, byFBOption));
- buf->duration_a_f0 = cpu_to_le16((u16)s_uGetDataDuration(pDevice, DATADUR_A_F0, cbFrameLength, byPktType,
- wCurrentRate, bNeedAck, uFragIdx, cbLastFragmentSize, uMACfragNum, byFBOption));
- buf->duration_a_f1 = cpu_to_le16((u16)s_uGetDataDuration(pDevice, DATADUR_A_F1, cbFrameLength, byPktType,
- wCurrentRate, bNeedAck, uFragIdx, cbLastFragmentSize, uMACfragNum, byFBOption));
+ buf->duration_a = cpu_to_le16((u16)s_uGetDataDuration(pDevice, DATADUR_A,
+ cbFrameLength, byPktType,
+ wCurrentRate, bNeedAck,
+ uFragIdx, cbLastFragmentSize,
+ uMACfragNum, byFBOption));
+ buf->duration_b = cpu_to_le16((u16)s_uGetDataDuration(pDevice, DATADUR_B,
+ cbFrameLength, PK_TYPE_11B,
+ pDevice->byTopCCKBasicRate,
+ bNeedAck, uFragIdx,
+ cbLastFragmentSize,
+ uMACfragNum, byFBOption));
+ buf->duration_a_f0 = cpu_to_le16((u16)s_uGetDataDuration(pDevice, DATADUR_A_F0,
+ cbFrameLength, byPktType,
+ wCurrentRate, bNeedAck,
+ uFragIdx,
+ cbLastFragmentSize,
+ uMACfragNum, byFBOption));
+ buf->duration_a_f1 = cpu_to_le16((u16)s_uGetDataDuration(pDevice, DATADUR_A_F1,
+ cbFrameLength, byPktType,
+ wCurrentRate, bNeedAck,
+ uFragIdx,
+ cbLastFragmentSize,
+ uMACfragNum, byFBOption));
buf->time_stamp_off_a = vnt_time_stamp_off(pDevice, wCurrentRate);
buf->time_stamp_off_b = vnt_time_stamp_off(pDevice, pDevice->byTopCCKBasicRate);
@@ -517,12 +532,32 @@ s_uFillDataHead(
byPktType, &buf->a);
/* Get Duration and TimeStampOff */
- buf->duration = cpu_to_le16((u16)s_uGetDataDuration(pDevice, DATADUR_A, cbFrameLength, byPktType,
- wCurrentRate, bNeedAck, uFragIdx, cbLastFragmentSize, uMACfragNum, byFBOption));
- buf->duration_f0 = cpu_to_le16((u16)s_uGetDataDuration(pDevice, DATADUR_A_F0, cbFrameLength, byPktType,
- wCurrentRate, bNeedAck, uFragIdx, cbLastFragmentSize, uMACfragNum, byFBOption));
- buf->duration_f1 = cpu_to_le16((u16)s_uGetDataDuration(pDevice, DATADUR_A_F1, cbFrameLength, byPktType,
- wCurrentRate, bNeedAck, uFragIdx, cbLastFragmentSize, uMACfragNum, byFBOption));
+ buf->duration = cpu_to_le16((u16)s_uGetDataDuration(pDevice, DATADUR_A,
+ cbFrameLength,
+ byPktType,
+ wCurrentRate, bNeedAck,
+ uFragIdx,
+ cbLastFragmentSize,
+ uMACfragNum,
+ byFBOption));
+ buf->duration_f0 = cpu_to_le16((u16)s_uGetDataDuration(pDevice,
+ DATADUR_A_F0,
+ cbFrameLength,
+ byPktType,
+ wCurrentRate,
+ bNeedAck, uFragIdx,
+ cbLastFragmentSize,
+ uMACfragNum,
+ byFBOption));
+ buf->duration_f1 = cpu_to_le16((u16)s_uGetDataDuration(pDevice,
+ DATADUR_A_F1,
+ cbFrameLength,
+ byPktType,
+ wCurrentRate,
+ bNeedAck, uFragIdx,
+ cbLastFragmentSize,
+ uMACfragNum,
+ byFBOption));
buf->time_stamp_off = vnt_time_stamp_off(pDevice, wCurrentRate);
return buf->duration;
}
--
2.7.4
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#187): https://lists.elisa.tech/g/linux-safety/message/187
Mute This Topic: https://lists.elisa.tech/mt/78451464/5278000
Group Owner: linux-safety+owner@lists.elisa.tech
Unsubscribe: https://lists.elisa.tech/g/linux-safety/unsub [linux-safety@archiver.kernel.org]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-safety] [PATCH 2/2] staging: vt6655: Correct wrappping in rxtx.c
2020-11-23 11:59 ` [linux-safety] [PATCH 2/2] staging: vt6655: Correct wrappping in rxtx.c Milan Lakhani
@ 2020-11-23 13:17 ` Lukas Bulwahn
2020-11-24 10:32 ` Milan Lakhani
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Lukas Bulwahn @ 2020-11-23 13:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Milan Lakhani
Cc: forest, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-safety
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 12:59 PM Milan Lakhani
<milan.lakhani@codethink.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Correct line length and alignment in rxtx.c. Reported by checkpatch.
>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: Forest Bond <forest@alittletooquiet.net>
> CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> CC: linux-safety@lists.elisa.tech
Milan, I am wondering where you picked up this convention to add these
Cc: and CC: tags in your patch?
Is there some documentation that points out to do that? (That might
need to be fixed...)
Did you observe that on some other commits? I think these tags are
added by some maintainers (probably tool-supported) when they pick the
patches, not by the authors, though.
> Signed-off-by: Milan Lakhani <milan.lakhani@codethink.co.uk>
> ---
> drivers/staging/vt6655/rxtx.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6655/rxtx.c b/drivers/staging/vt6655/rxtx.c
> index 508e1bd..4073c33 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/vt6655/rxtx.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/vt6655/rxtx.c
> @@ -492,14 +492,29 @@ s_uFillDataHead(
> pDevice->byTopCCKBasicRate,
> PK_TYPE_11B, &buf->b);
> /* Get Duration and TimeStamp */
> - buf->duration_a = cpu_to_le16((u16)s_uGetDataDuration(pDevice, DATADUR_A, cbFrameLength, byPktType,
> - wCurrentRate, bNeedAck, uFragIdx, cbLastFragmentSize, uMACfragNum, byFBOption));
> - buf->duration_b = cpu_to_le16((u16)s_uGetDataDuration(pDevice, DATADUR_B, cbFrameLength, PK_TYPE_11B,
> - pDevice->byTopCCKBasicRate, bNeedAck, uFragIdx, cbLastFragmentSize, uMACfragNum, byFBOption));
> - buf->duration_a_f0 = cpu_to_le16((u16)s_uGetDataDuration(pDevice, DATADUR_A_F0, cbFrameLength, byPktType,
> - wCurrentRate, bNeedAck, uFragIdx, cbLastFragmentSize, uMACfragNum, byFBOption));
> - buf->duration_a_f1 = cpu_to_le16((u16)s_uGetDataDuration(pDevice, DATADUR_A_F1, cbFrameLength, byPktType,
> - wCurrentRate, bNeedAck, uFragIdx, cbLastFragmentSize, uMACfragNum, byFBOption));
> + buf->duration_a = cpu_to_le16((u16)s_uGetDataDuration(pDevice, DATADUR_A,
> + cbFrameLength, byPktType,
> + wCurrentRate, bNeedAck,
> + uFragIdx, cbLastFragmentSize,
> + uMACfragNum, byFBOption));
> + buf->duration_b = cpu_to_le16((u16)s_uGetDataDuration(pDevice, DATADUR_B,
> + cbFrameLength, PK_TYPE_11B,
> + pDevice->byTopCCKBasicRate,
> + bNeedAck, uFragIdx,
> + cbLastFragmentSize,
> + uMACfragNum, byFBOption));
> + buf->duration_a_f0 = cpu_to_le16((u16)s_uGetDataDuration(pDevice, DATADUR_A_F0,
> + cbFrameLength, byPktType,
> + wCurrentRate, bNeedAck,
> + uFragIdx,
> + cbLastFragmentSize,
> + uMACfragNum, byFBOption));
> + buf->duration_a_f1 = cpu_to_le16((u16)s_uGetDataDuration(pDevice, DATADUR_A_F1,
> + cbFrameLength, byPktType,
> + wCurrentRate, bNeedAck,
> + uFragIdx,
> + cbLastFragmentSize,
> + uMACfragNum, byFBOption));
>
Now to this change... it seems reasonable to refactor this into a
dedicated function or macro because this is largely "copy-and-paste"
calls with slight variable on a single argument.
How about proposing such a change instead?
> buf->time_stamp_off_a = vnt_time_stamp_off(pDevice, wCurrentRate);
> buf->time_stamp_off_b = vnt_time_stamp_off(pDevice, pDevice->byTopCCKBasicRate);
> @@ -517,12 +532,32 @@ s_uFillDataHead(
> byPktType, &buf->a);
>
> /* Get Duration and TimeStampOff */
> - buf->duration = cpu_to_le16((u16)s_uGetDataDuration(pDevice, DATADUR_A, cbFrameLength, byPktType,
> - wCurrentRate, bNeedAck, uFragIdx, cbLastFragmentSize, uMACfragNum, byFBOption));
> - buf->duration_f0 = cpu_to_le16((u16)s_uGetDataDuration(pDevice, DATADUR_A_F0, cbFrameLength, byPktType,
> - wCurrentRate, bNeedAck, uFragIdx, cbLastFragmentSize, uMACfragNum, byFBOption));
> - buf->duration_f1 = cpu_to_le16((u16)s_uGetDataDuration(pDevice, DATADUR_A_F1, cbFrameLength, byPktType,
> - wCurrentRate, bNeedAck, uFragIdx, cbLastFragmentSize, uMACfragNum, byFBOption));
> + buf->duration = cpu_to_le16((u16)s_uGetDataDuration(pDevice, DATADUR_A,
> + cbFrameLength,
> + byPktType,
> + wCurrentRate, bNeedAck,
> + uFragIdx,
> + cbLastFragmentSize,
> + uMACfragNum,
> + byFBOption));
> + buf->duration_f0 = cpu_to_le16((u16)s_uGetDataDuration(pDevice,
> + DATADUR_A_F0,
> + cbFrameLength,
> + byPktType,
> + wCurrentRate,
> + bNeedAck, uFragIdx,
> + cbLastFragmentSize,
> + uMACfragNum,
> + byFBOption));
> + buf->duration_f1 = cpu_to_le16((u16)s_uGetDataDuration(pDevice,
> + DATADUR_A_F1,
> + cbFrameLength,
> + byPktType,
> + wCurrentRate,
> + bNeedAck, uFragIdx,
> + cbLastFragmentSize,
> + uMACfragNum,
> + byFBOption));
> buf->time_stamp_off = vnt_time_stamp_off(pDevice, wCurrentRate);
> return buf->duration;
> }
> --
> 2.7.4
>
>
>
>
>
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#188): https://lists.elisa.tech/g/linux-safety/message/188
Mute This Topic: https://lists.elisa.tech/mt/78451464/5278000
Group Owner: linux-safety+owner@lists.elisa.tech
Unsubscribe: https://lists.elisa.tech/g/linux-safety/unsub [linux-safety@archiver.kernel.org]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-safety] [PATCH 2/2] staging: vt6655: Correct wrappping in rxtx.c
2020-11-23 13:17 ` Lukas Bulwahn
@ 2020-11-24 10:32 ` Milan Lakhani
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Milan Lakhani @ 2020-11-24 10:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lukas Bulwahn; +Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-safety
Hi Lukas,
On 23/11/2020 13:17, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 12:59 PM Milan Lakhani
> <milan.lakhani@codethink.co.uk> wrote:
>> Correct line length and alignment in rxtx.c. Reported by checkpatch.
>>
>> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
>> Cc: Forest Bond <forest@alittletooquiet.net>
>> CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> CC: linux-safety@lists.elisa.tech
> Milan, I am wondering where you picked up this convention to add these
> Cc: and CC: tags in your patch?
>
> Is there some documentation that points out to do that? (That might
> need to be fixed...)
>
> Did you observe that on some other commits? I think these tags are
> added by some maintainers (probably tool-supported) when they pick the
> patches, not by the authors, though.
I'm using git send-email to send patches and, as described in the
'Sending patches with git send-email' section on
https://kernelnewbies.org/FirstKernelPatch, git-send-email automatically
Ccs people with the the Cc and CC tags. I did see this in other commits
too, maybe they're used by the authors to pick out the maintainers to
send the patches to?
>
>> Signed-off-by: Milan Lakhani <milan.lakhani@codethink.co.uk>
>> ---
>> drivers/staging/vt6655/rxtx.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>> 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6655/rxtx.c b/drivers/staging/vt6655/rxtx.c
>> index 508e1bd..4073c33 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/vt6655/rxtx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/vt6655/rxtx.c
>> @@ -492,14 +492,29 @@ s_uFillDataHead(
>> pDevice->byTopCCKBasicRate,
>> PK_TYPE_11B, &buf->b);
>> /* Get Duration and TimeStamp */
>> - buf->duration_a = cpu_to_le16((u16)s_uGetDataDuration(pDevice, DATADUR_A, cbFrameLength, byPktType,
>> - wCurrentRate, bNeedAck, uFragIdx, cbLastFragmentSize, uMACfragNum, byFBOption));
>> - buf->duration_b = cpu_to_le16((u16)s_uGetDataDuration(pDevice, DATADUR_B, cbFrameLength, PK_TYPE_11B,
>> - pDevice->byTopCCKBasicRate, bNeedAck, uFragIdx, cbLastFragmentSize, uMACfragNum, byFBOption));
>> - buf->duration_a_f0 = cpu_to_le16((u16)s_uGetDataDuration(pDevice, DATADUR_A_F0, cbFrameLength, byPktType,
>> - wCurrentRate, bNeedAck, uFragIdx, cbLastFragmentSize, uMACfragNum, byFBOption));
>> - buf->duration_a_f1 = cpu_to_le16((u16)s_uGetDataDuration(pDevice, DATADUR_A_F1, cbFrameLength, byPktType,
>> - wCurrentRate, bNeedAck, uFragIdx, cbLastFragmentSize, uMACfragNum, byFBOption));
>> + buf->duration_a = cpu_to_le16((u16)s_uGetDataDuration(pDevice, DATADUR_A,
>> + cbFrameLength, byPktType,
>> + wCurrentRate, bNeedAck,
>> + uFragIdx, cbLastFragmentSize,
>> + uMACfragNum, byFBOption));
>> + buf->duration_b = cpu_to_le16((u16)s_uGetDataDuration(pDevice, DATADUR_B,
>> + cbFrameLength, PK_TYPE_11B,
>> + pDevice->byTopCCKBasicRate,
>> + bNeedAck, uFragIdx,
>> + cbLastFragmentSize,
>> + uMACfragNum, byFBOption));
>> + buf->duration_a_f0 = cpu_to_le16((u16)s_uGetDataDuration(pDevice, DATADUR_A_F0,
>> + cbFrameLength, byPktType,
>> + wCurrentRate, bNeedAck,
>> + uFragIdx,
>> + cbLastFragmentSize,
>> + uMACfragNum, byFBOption));
>> + buf->duration_a_f1 = cpu_to_le16((u16)s_uGetDataDuration(pDevice, DATADUR_A_F1,
>> + cbFrameLength, byPktType,
>> + wCurrentRate, bNeedAck,
>> + uFragIdx,
>> + cbLastFragmentSize,
>> + uMACfragNum, byFBOption));
>>
> Now to this change... it seems reasonable to refactor this into a
> dedicated function or macro because this is largely "copy-and-paste"
> calls with slight variable on a single argument.
>
> How about proposing such a change instead?
Thanks, good idea, I have made a macro for it and am about to send the
patch, it would be good to hear if it is what you were envisaging.
>> buf->time_stamp_off_a = vnt_time_stamp_off(pDevice, wCurrentRate);
>> buf->time_stamp_off_b = vnt_time_stamp_off(pDevice, pDevice->byTopCCKBasicRate);
>> @@ -517,12 +532,32 @@ s_uFillDataHead(
>> byPktType, &buf->a);
>>
>> /* Get Duration and TimeStampOff */
>> - buf->duration = cpu_to_le16((u16)s_uGetDataDuration(pDevice, DATADUR_A, cbFrameLength, byPktType,
>> - wCurrentRate, bNeedAck, uFragIdx, cbLastFragmentSize, uMACfragNum, byFBOption));
>> - buf->duration_f0 = cpu_to_le16((u16)s_uGetDataDuration(pDevice, DATADUR_A_F0, cbFrameLength, byPktType,
>> - wCurrentRate, bNeedAck, uFragIdx, cbLastFragmentSize, uMACfragNum, byFBOption));
>> - buf->duration_f1 = cpu_to_le16((u16)s_uGetDataDuration(pDevice, DATADUR_A_F1, cbFrameLength, byPktType,
>> - wCurrentRate, bNeedAck, uFragIdx, cbLastFragmentSize, uMACfragNum, byFBOption));
>> + buf->duration = cpu_to_le16((u16)s_uGetDataDuration(pDevice, DATADUR_A,
>> + cbFrameLength,
>> + byPktType,
>> + wCurrentRate, bNeedAck,
>> + uFragIdx,
>> + cbLastFragmentSize,
>> + uMACfragNum,
>> + byFBOption));
>> + buf->duration_f0 = cpu_to_le16((u16)s_uGetDataDuration(pDevice,
>> + DATADUR_A_F0,
>> + cbFrameLength,
>> + byPktType,
>> + wCurrentRate,
>> + bNeedAck, uFragIdx,
>> + cbLastFragmentSize,
>> + uMACfragNum,
>> + byFBOption));
>> + buf->duration_f1 = cpu_to_le16((u16)s_uGetDataDuration(pDevice,
>> + DATADUR_A_F1,
>> + cbFrameLength,
>> + byPktType,
>> + wCurrentRate,
>> + bNeedAck, uFragIdx,
>> + cbLastFragmentSize,
>> + uMACfragNum,
>> + byFBOption));
>> buf->time_stamp_off = vnt_time_stamp_off(pDevice, wCurrentRate);
>> return buf->duration;
>> }
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#197): https://lists.elisa.tech/g/linux-safety/message/197
Mute This Topic: https://lists.elisa.tech/mt/78451464/5278000
Group Owner: linux-safety+owner@lists.elisa.tech
Unsubscribe: https://lists.elisa.tech/g/linux-safety/unsub [linux-safety@archiver.kernel.org]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-11-24 10:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-11-23 11:59 [linux-safety] [PATCH 1/2] staging: vt6655: Fix alignment in device_main.c Milan Lakhani
2020-11-23 11:59 ` [linux-safety] [PATCH 2/2] staging: vt6655: Correct wrappping in rxtx.c Milan Lakhani
2020-11-23 13:17 ` Lukas Bulwahn
2020-11-24 10:32 ` Milan Lakhani
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).