linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Matt Parnell <mparnell@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com,
	matthew.garrett@nebula.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Kernel Lockdown: Add an option to allow raw MSR access even, in confidentiality mode.
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2019 10:36:20 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201911301035.74813D4533@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <339ca47a-6ed1-4ab4-f8cf-7b205fa9f773@gmail.com>

On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 12:49:48AM -0600, Matt Parnell wrote:
> From 452b8460e464422d268659a8abb93353a182f8c8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Matt Parnell <mparnell@gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2019 00:44:09 -0600
> Subject: [PATCH] Kernel Lockdown: Add an option to allow raw MSR access even
>  in confidentiality mode.
> 
> For Intel CPUs, some of the MDS mitigations utilize the new "flush" MSR, and
> while this isn't something normally used in userspace, it does cause false
> positives for the "Forshadow" vulnerability.
> 
> Additionally, Intel CPUs use MSRs for voltage and frequency controls,
> which in
> many cases is useful for undervolting to avoid excess heat.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matt Parnell <mparnell@gmail.com>

I would expect this to just be implemented via LSM policy, not ifdefs
and Kconfig?

-Kees

> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/msr.c     |  5 ++++-
>  security/lockdown/Kconfig | 12 ++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/msr.c b/arch/x86/kernel/msr.c
> index 1547be359d7f..4adce59455c3 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/msr.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/msr.c
> @@ -80,10 +80,11 @@ static ssize_t msr_write(struct file *file, const
> char __user *buf,
>      int err = 0;
>      ssize_t bytes = 0;
>  
> +#if defined(LOCK_DOWN_DENY_RAW_MSR)
>      err = security_locked_down(LOCKDOWN_MSR);
>      if (err)
>          return err;
> -
> +#endif
>      if (count % 8)
>          return -EINVAL;    /* Invalid chunk size */
>  
> @@ -135,9 +136,11 @@ static long msr_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned
> int ioc, unsigned long arg)
>              err = -EFAULT;
>              break;
>          }
> +#if defined(LOCK_DOWN_DENY_RAW_MSR)
>          err = security_locked_down(LOCKDOWN_MSR);
>          if (err)
>              break;
> +#endif
>          err = wrmsr_safe_regs_on_cpu(cpu, regs);
>          if (err)
>              break;
> diff --git a/security/lockdown/Kconfig b/security/lockdown/Kconfig
> index e84ddf484010..f4fe72c4bf8f 100644
> --- a/security/lockdown/Kconfig
> +++ b/security/lockdown/Kconfig
> @@ -44,4 +44,16 @@ config LOCK_DOWN_KERNEL_FORCE_CONFIDENTIALITY
>       code to read confidential material held inside the kernel are
>       disabled.
>  
> +config LOCK_DOWN_DENY_RAW_MSR
> +    bool "Lock down and deny raw MSR access"
> +    depends on LOCK_DOWN_KERNEL_FORCE_CONFIDENTIALITY
> +    default y
> +    help
> +      Some Intel based systems require raw MSR access to use the flush
> +      MSR for MDS mitigation confirmation. Raw access can also be used
> +      to undervolt many Intel CPUs.
> +
> +      Say Y to prevent access or N to allow raw MSR access for such
> +      cases.
> +
>  endchoice
> -- 
> 2.24.0
> 
> 




-- 
Kees Cook

  reply	other threads:[~2019-11-30 18:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-30  6:49 [PATCH] Kernel Lockdown: Add an option to allow raw MSR access even, in confidentiality mode Matt Parnell
2019-11-30 18:36 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2019-11-30 19:09   ` Matt Parnell
2019-12-01 20:53     ` Matt Parnell
2019-12-02 18:29       ` Matt Parnell
2019-12-02 22:55         ` Jordan Glover
2019-12-02 23:13           ` Matt Parnell
2019-12-02 23:29           ` Matthew Garrett
2019-12-02 23:31             ` Matt Parnell
2019-12-03  2:13   ` Matt Parnell
2019-12-03  2:16     ` Matthew Garrett
2019-12-03  2:24       ` Matt Parnell
2019-12-03  2:50         ` Matt Parnell
2019-12-03  3:57           ` Matt Parnell
2019-12-02 19:43 ` Matthew Garrett
2019-12-02 20:39   ` Matt Parnell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201911301035.74813D4533@keescook \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew.garrett@nebula.com \
    --cc=mparnell@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).