linux-security-module.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
To: Matthew Garrett <matthewgarrett@google.com>
Cc: jmorris@namei.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@google.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V40 12/29] x86: Lock down IO port access when the kernel is locked down
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2022 14:25:41 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAd53p6d2CsZcwaX0ZtjmOmQv1Dru4qmM-uRxtHJi0k5PnFMFQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190820001805.241928-13-matthewgarrett@google.com>

Hi Matthew,

On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 8:20 AM Matthew Garrett
<matthewgarrett@google.com> wrote:
>
> From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
>
> IO port access would permit users to gain access to PCI configuration
> registers, which in turn (on a lot of hardware) give access to MMIO
> register space. This would potentially permit root to trigger arbitrary
> DMA, so lock it down by default.
>
> This also implicitly locks down the KDADDIO, KDDELIO, KDENABIO and
> KDDISABIO console ioctls.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> cc: x86@kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>

This patch breaks ioperm() usage from userspace programs with CAP_SYS_RAWIO cap.

I wonder if it's possible to revert this commit?

Kai-Heng

> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/ioport.c     | 7 +++++--
>  include/linux/security.h     | 1 +
>  security/lockdown/lockdown.c | 1 +
>  3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ioport.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ioport.c
> index 0fe1c8782208..61a89d3c0382 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/ioport.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ioport.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>  #include <linux/errno.h>
>  #include <linux/types.h>
>  #include <linux/ioport.h>
> +#include <linux/security.h>
>  #include <linux/smp.h>
>  #include <linux/stddef.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
> @@ -31,7 +32,8 @@ long ksys_ioperm(unsigned long from, unsigned long num, int turn_on)
>
>         if ((from + num <= from) || (from + num > IO_BITMAP_BITS))
>                 return -EINVAL;
> -       if (turn_on && !capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO))
> +       if (turn_on && (!capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO) ||
> +                       security_locked_down(LOCKDOWN_IOPORT)))
>                 return -EPERM;
>
>         /*
> @@ -126,7 +128,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(iopl, unsigned int, level)
>                 return -EINVAL;
>         /* Trying to gain more privileges? */
>         if (level > old) {
> -               if (!capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO))
> +               if (!capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO) ||
> +                   security_locked_down(LOCKDOWN_IOPORT))
>                         return -EPERM;
>         }
>         regs->flags = (regs->flags & ~X86_EFLAGS_IOPL) |
> diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
> index 2b763f0ee352..cd93fa5d3c6d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/security.h
> +++ b/include/linux/security.h
> @@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ enum lockdown_reason {
>         LOCKDOWN_KEXEC,
>         LOCKDOWN_HIBERNATION,
>         LOCKDOWN_PCI_ACCESS,
> +       LOCKDOWN_IOPORT,
>         LOCKDOWN_INTEGRITY_MAX,
>         LOCKDOWN_CONFIDENTIALITY_MAX,
>  };
> diff --git a/security/lockdown/lockdown.c b/security/lockdown/lockdown.c
> index 410e90eda848..8b7d65dbb086 100644
> --- a/security/lockdown/lockdown.c
> +++ b/security/lockdown/lockdown.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ static char *lockdown_reasons[LOCKDOWN_CONFIDENTIALITY_MAX+1] = {
>         [LOCKDOWN_KEXEC] = "kexec of unsigned images",
>         [LOCKDOWN_HIBERNATION] = "hibernation",
>         [LOCKDOWN_PCI_ACCESS] = "direct PCI access",
> +       [LOCKDOWN_IOPORT] = "raw io port access",
>         [LOCKDOWN_INTEGRITY_MAX] = "integrity",
>         [LOCKDOWN_CONFIDENTIALITY_MAX] = "confidentiality",
>  };
> --
> 2.23.0.rc1.153.gdeed80330f-goog
>

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-05  6:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-20  0:17 [PATCH V40 00/29] Add kernel lockdown functionality Matthew Garrett
2019-08-20  0:17 ` [PATCH V40 01/29] security: Support early LSMs Matthew Garrett
2019-08-20  0:17 ` [PATCH V40 02/29] security: Add a "locked down" LSM hook Matthew Garrett
2019-08-20  0:17 ` [PATCH V40 03/29] security: Add a static lockdown policy LSM Matthew Garrett
2019-08-20  0:17 ` [PATCH V40 04/29] lockdown: Enforce module signatures if the kernel is locked down Matthew Garrett
2019-08-20  0:17 ` [PATCH V40 05/29] lockdown: Restrict /dev/{mem,kmem,port} when " Matthew Garrett
2019-08-20  0:17 ` [PATCH V40 06/29] kexec_load: Disable at runtime if " Matthew Garrett
2019-08-20  0:17 ` [PATCH V40 07/29] lockdown: Copy secure_boot flag in boot params across kexec reboot Matthew Garrett
2019-08-20  0:17 ` [PATCH V40 08/29] kexec_file: split KEXEC_VERIFY_SIG into KEXEC_SIG and KEXEC_SIG_FORCE Matthew Garrett
2019-08-30 14:26   ` Philipp Rudo
2019-08-20  0:17 ` [PATCH V40 09/29] kexec_file: Restrict at runtime if the kernel is locked down Matthew Garrett
2019-08-20  0:17 ` [PATCH V40 10/29] hibernate: Disable when " Matthew Garrett
2019-08-20 21:43   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-25  9:51   ` Pavel Machek
2019-08-20  0:17 ` [PATCH V40 11/29] PCI: Lock down BAR access " Matthew Garrett
2019-08-20 19:45   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-08-20 21:04     ` Matthew Garrett
2019-08-20  0:17 ` [PATCH V40 12/29] x86: Lock down IO port " Matthew Garrett
2022-01-05  6:25   ` Kai-Heng Feng [this message]
2022-01-05  6:48     ` Matthew Garrett
2022-01-05  6:57       ` Kai-Heng Feng
2022-01-05  7:20         ` Matthew Garrett
2022-01-05 10:05           ` Kai-Heng Feng
2022-01-05 10:14             ` Matthew Garrett
2019-08-20  0:17 ` [PATCH V40 13/29] x86/msr: Restrict MSR " Matthew Garrett
2019-08-20  0:17 ` [PATCH V40 14/29] ACPI: Limit access to custom_method " Matthew Garrett
2019-08-20 22:07   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-20  0:17 ` [PATCH V40 15/29] acpi: Ignore acpi_rsdp kernel param when the kernel has been " Matthew Garrett
2019-08-20 22:08   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-20  0:17 ` [PATCH V40 16/29] acpi: Disable ACPI table override if the kernel is " Matthew Garrett
2019-08-20 22:08   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-20  0:17 ` [PATCH V40 17/29] lockdown: Prohibit PCMCIA CIS storage when " Matthew Garrett
2019-08-20  0:17 ` [PATCH V40 18/29] lockdown: Lock down TIOCSSERIAL Matthew Garrett
2019-08-20  0:17 ` [PATCH V40 19/29] lockdown: Lock down module params that specify hardware parameters (eg. ioport) Matthew Garrett
2019-08-20 16:39   ` Jessica Yu
2019-08-20  0:17 ` [PATCH V40 20/29] x86/mmiotrace: Lock down the testmmiotrace module Matthew Garrett
2019-08-20  0:17 ` [PATCH V40 21/29] lockdown: Lock down /proc/kcore Matthew Garrett
2019-08-20  0:17 ` [PATCH V40 22/29] lockdown: Lock down tracing and perf kprobes when in confidentiality mode Matthew Garrett
2019-08-20  0:17 ` [PATCH V40 23/29] bpf: Restrict bpf when kernel lockdown is " Matthew Garrett
2019-08-20  0:18 ` [PATCH V40 24/29] lockdown: Lock down perf when " Matthew Garrett
2019-08-20  0:18 ` [PATCH V40 25/29] kexec: Allow kexec_file() with appropriate IMA policy when locked down Matthew Garrett
2019-08-20  0:18 ` [PATCH V40 26/29] debugfs: Restrict debugfs when the kernel is " Matthew Garrett
2019-08-20  0:18 ` [PATCH V40 27/29] tracefs: Restrict tracefs " Matthew Garrett
2019-08-20  0:18 ` [PATCH V40 28/29] efi: Restrict efivar_ssdt_load " Matthew Garrett
2019-08-20  0:18 ` [PATCH V40 29/29] lockdown: Print current->comm in restriction messages Matthew Garrett
2019-08-20  6:45 ` [PATCH V40 00/29] Add kernel lockdown functionality James Morris
2019-08-30 16:28 ` [PATCH V40 03/29] security: Add a static lockdown policy LSM David Howells
2019-09-04 16:51   ` Matthew Garrett
2019-09-10 10:06     ` Matthew Garrett
2019-08-30 16:31 ` [PATCH V40 04/29] lockdown: Enforce module signatures if the kernel is locked down David Howells
2019-09-04 16:57   ` Matthew Garrett
2019-08-30 16:32 ` [PATCH V40 23/29] bpf: Restrict bpf when kernel lockdown is in confidentiality mode David Howells

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAAd53p6d2CsZcwaX0ZtjmOmQv1Dru4qmM-uRxtHJi0k5PnFMFQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=kai.heng.feng@canonical.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthewgarrett@google.com \
    --cc=mjg59@google.com \
    --cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).