linux-trace-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Sameeruddin Shaik <sameeruddin.shaik8@gmail.com>
Cc: Tzvetomir Stoyanov <tz.stoyanov@gmail.com>,
	Linux Trace Devel <linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libtracefs: An API to set the filtering of functions
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 22:39:12 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210305223912.58f4e86c@rorschach.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK7tX=aASGnr+zyAc+Y_oeqPwOdkwkstJUvypUS=yqNmenCy_Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 07:25:18 +0530
Sameeruddin Shaik <sameeruddin.shaik8@gmail.com> wrote:

> hi steve,
> 
> i have one doubt.
> >Note, @filters should be of type: const char * const * filters,  as not
> >only is filters pointing to constant strings, the array itself will not be
> >modified.  
> 
> what If the user wants to capture the filters at run time like below ?
> let's say
> 
>   filters = malloc(sizeof(char *));
>         if (!filters)
>                 return 1;
>         printf("please enter the input filters count\n");
>         scanf("%d", &fil_count);
>         while(i < fil_count) {
>                 scanf("%s", buf);
>                 slen = strlen(buf);
>                 if (!slen)
>                         return 1;
>                 filters[i] = calloc(1, slen);
>                 strncpy(filters[i++], buf, slen);
>         }
> at that time, this declaration will be problematic right?, because we
> are trying to modify

No it wont. You can assign const pointers to dynamic pointers, but not
the other way around. It's a way to show that the function you are
calling wont do anything with the array you pass to it.

> the read-only memory. Are we expecting the user to supply filters at
> compile time like below?
> const char * const *filters = {"kvm_pmu_reset", "kvm_pmu_init",
> "dir_item_err", NULL};

No, as explained above.

> 
> Tzvetomir & steve,
> >Since a triple pointer is difficult to manage in the code, you could have:
> >
> >       const char **e = NULL;
> >
> >
> >               if (errs) {
> >                        e = realloc(sizeof(*e), j + 1);
> >                        e[j++] = filters[i];
> >               }
> >
> >Then at the end:
> >
> >       if (errs)
> >                *errs = e;  
> i have a concern here
> when a double pointer is doing our work here without any overhead, why
> we want to make it a triple pointer?

What overhead? A string is a pointer, an array of strings is a double
pointer, and passing in the address to an array of strings so you can
modify that array is a triple pointer, and that's exactly what you need
for errs.

This is basic C coding, nothing special here.

I'm curious to why you picked this particular API to implement. Is
there something you are planning on using this for?

-- Steve

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-06  3:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-06 11:20 [PATCH] libtracefs: An API to set the filtering of functions Sameeruddin shaik
2021-03-05 12:20 ` Tzvetomir Stoyanov
2021-03-05 14:39   ` Steven Rostedt
2021-03-05 14:54     ` Steven Rostedt
2021-03-06  1:55       ` Sameeruddin Shaik
2021-03-06  3:39         ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2021-03-06  4:29           ` Sameeruddin Shaik
2021-03-06  5:19             ` Steven Rostedt
2021-03-06 15:05         ` Steven Rostedt
2021-03-08 23:53           ` Sameeruddin Shaik
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-03-10 16:21 Sameeruddin shaik
2021-03-10  5:28 ` Tzvetomir Stoyanov
2021-03-10 16:51 ` Sameeruddin Shaik
2021-03-10  5:28   ` Tzvetomir Stoyanov
2021-03-02 17:15 Sameeruddin shaik
2021-03-01 18:17 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-03-02  4:21   ` Tzvetomir Stoyanov
2021-03-02  5:14     ` Sameeruddin Shaik
2021-03-02 13:15       ` Steven Rostedt
2021-03-03  1:16   ` Sameeruddin Shaik
2021-03-02  1:28     ` Steven Rostedt
2021-03-04  8:59       ` Tzvetomir Stoyanov
2021-03-04  9:43         ` Sameeruddin Shaik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210305223912.58f4e86c@rorschach.local.home \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sameeruddin.shaik8@gmail.com \
    --cc=tz.stoyanov@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).