From: Sameeruddin Shaik <sameeruddin.shaik8@gmail.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Tzvetomir Stoyanov <tz.stoyanov@gmail.com>,
Linux Trace Devel <linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libtracefs: An API to set the filtering of functions
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2021 09:59:34 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK7tX=b=xQCB4ugQb5YSQisf+_bmmLrUbVgcCXG+vZD7upmx7A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210305223912.58f4e86c@rorschach.local.home>
Okay steve
Actually I chose this API randomly from bugzilla, i don't have any
plans as of now.
I am developing it, as per your requirement.
Out of curiosity, I started implementing this API. Actually I am a
novice in development,
i know somewhat like how to write code logically and make it work, but
i haven't followed any standard
till now. I am learning some new things from your reviews.
Thanks,
sameer.
On Sat, 6 Mar, 2021, 9:08 am Steven Rostedt, <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 6 Mar 2021 07:25:18 +0530
> Sameeruddin Shaik <sameeruddin.shaik8@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > hi steve,
> >
> > i have one doubt.
> > >Note, @filters should be of type: const char * const * filters, as not
> > >only is filters pointing to constant strings, the array itself will not be
> > >modified.
> >
> > what If the user wants to capture the filters at run time like below ?
> > let's say
> >
> > filters = malloc(sizeof(char *));
> > if (!filters)
> > return 1;
> > printf("please enter the input filters count\n");
> > scanf("%d", &fil_count);
> > while(i < fil_count) {
> > scanf("%s", buf);
> > slen = strlen(buf);
> > if (!slen)
> > return 1;
> > filters[i] = calloc(1, slen);
> > strncpy(filters[i++], buf, slen);
> > }
> > at that time, this declaration will be problematic right?, because we
> > are trying to modify
>
> No it wont. You can assign const pointers to dynamic pointers, but not
> the other way around. It's a way to show that the function you are
> calling wont do anything with the array you pass to it.
>
> > the read-only memory. Are we expecting the user to supply filters at
> > compile time like below?
> > const char * const *filters = {"kvm_pmu_reset", "kvm_pmu_init",
> > "dir_item_err", NULL};
>
> No, as explained above.
>
> >
> > Tzvetomir & steve,
> > >Since a triple pointer is difficult to manage in the code, you could have:
> > >
> > > const char **e = NULL;
> > >
> > >
> > > if (errs) {
> > > e = realloc(sizeof(*e), j + 1);
> > > e[j++] = filters[i];
> > > }
> > >
> > >Then at the end:
> > >
> > > if (errs)
> > > *errs = e;
> > i have a concern here
> > when a double pointer is doing our work here without any overhead, why
> > we want to make it a triple pointer?
>
> What overhead? A string is a pointer, an array of strings is a double
> pointer, and passing in the address to an array of strings so you can
> modify that array is a triple pointer, and that's exactly what you need
> for errs.
>
> This is basic C coding, nothing special here.
>
> I'm curious to why you picked this particular API to implement. Is
> there something you are planning on using this for?
>
> -- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-06 4:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-06 11:20 [PATCH] libtracefs: An API to set the filtering of functions Sameeruddin shaik
2021-03-05 12:20 ` Tzvetomir Stoyanov
2021-03-05 14:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-03-05 14:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-03-06 1:55 ` Sameeruddin Shaik
2021-03-06 3:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-03-06 4:29 ` Sameeruddin Shaik [this message]
2021-03-06 5:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-03-06 15:05 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-03-08 23:53 ` Sameeruddin Shaik
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-03-10 16:21 Sameeruddin shaik
2021-03-10 5:28 ` Tzvetomir Stoyanov
2021-03-10 16:51 ` Sameeruddin Shaik
2021-03-10 5:28 ` Tzvetomir Stoyanov
2021-03-02 17:15 Sameeruddin shaik
2021-03-01 18:17 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-03-02 4:21 ` Tzvetomir Stoyanov
2021-03-02 5:14 ` Sameeruddin Shaik
2021-03-02 13:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-03-03 1:16 ` Sameeruddin Shaik
2021-03-02 1:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2021-03-04 8:59 ` Tzvetomir Stoyanov
2021-03-04 9:43 ` Sameeruddin Shaik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAK7tX=b=xQCB4ugQb5YSQisf+_bmmLrUbVgcCXG+vZD7upmx7A@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=sameeruddin.shaik8@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-trace-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tz.stoyanov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).