linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, alex@zadara.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] xfs_repair: try to correct sb_unit value from secondaries
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 09:55:52 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200226175552.GH8045@magnolia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e1830559-69bf-6302-dc85-e3994f680882@sandeen.net>

On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 09:42:01AM -0800, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 2/4/20 4:47 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > 
> > If the primary superblock's sb_unit leads to a rootino calculation that
> > doesn't match sb_rootino /but/ we can find a secondary superblock whose
> > sb_unit does match, fix the primary.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> > ---
> 
> With the previous patch issuing a warning
> 
> +_("sb root inode value %" PRIu64 " valid but in unaligned location (expected %"PRIu64") possibly due to sunit change\n"),
> 
> What does this do in the case where the user intentionally changed the
> sunit, which is (I think) the situation launched this work in the first
> place?

[echoing what we just discussed on irc]

repair will print the above warning, and then it'll try to find either a
backup sb with a sunit value that makes the computation work, or guess
at sunit values until it finds one that makes the computation work.  If
it finds a reasonable sunit value it'll change it back to that.

If the user mounts an old kernel with the same bad sunit value, the
kernel will set it back to the bad value and we wash, rinse, and repeat.

If the user mounts a new kernel with the same bad sunit value, it'll
decline to change the sunit value.

If the user runs the bad-sunit fs against an old xfs_repair it will
descend into madness nuking the root directory, which is why we're
trying to nudge ourselves away from the bad value.

> Will that warning persist in the case of an intentional sunit change?

Yes.

--D

> Thanks,
> -Eric
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2020-02-26 17:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-05  0:46 [PATCH v4 0/7] xfs_repair: do not trash valid root dirs Darrick J. Wong
2020-02-05  0:46 ` [PATCH 1/7] xfs_repair: replace verify_inum with libxfs inode validators Darrick J. Wong
2020-02-05  0:50   ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-02-17 13:50   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-02-19  4:32     ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-02-26 16:55   ` Eric Sandeen
2020-02-05  0:46 ` [PATCH 2/7] mkfs: check root inode location Darrick J. Wong
2020-02-17 13:50   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-02-05  0:46 ` [PATCH 3/7] xfs_repair: enforce that inode btree chunks can't point to AG headers Darrick J. Wong
2020-02-17 13:51   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-02-26 17:09   ` Eric Sandeen
2020-02-26 17:24     ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-02-26 17:34       ` Eric Sandeen
2020-02-26 17:19   ` Eric Sandeen
2020-02-26 17:32     ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-02-26 17:40       ` Eric Sandeen
2020-02-05  0:47 ` [PATCH 4/7] xfs_repair: refactor fixed inode location checks Darrick J. Wong
2020-02-17 13:51   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-02-05  0:47 ` [PATCH 5/7] xfs_repair: use libxfs function to calculate root inode location Darrick J. Wong
2020-02-17 13:53   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-02-05  0:47 ` [PATCH 6/7] xfs_repair: check plausibility of root dir pointer before trashing it Darrick J. Wong
2020-02-17 13:53   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-02-05  0:47 ` [PATCH 7/7] xfs_repair: try to correct sb_unit value from secondaries Darrick J. Wong
2020-02-17 13:55   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-02-26 17:42   ` Eric Sandeen
2020-02-26 17:55     ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200226175552.GH8045@magnolia \
    --to=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
    --cc=alex@zadara.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).