linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86, numa: always initialize all possible nodes
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 14:49:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190211134909.GA107845@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190125105008.GJ3560@dhcp22.suse.cz>


* Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Thu 24-01-19 11:10:50, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > On 1/24/19 6:17 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > and nr_cpus set to 4. The underlying reason is tha the device is bound
> > > to node 2 which doesn't have any memory and init_cpu_to_node only
> > > initializes memory-less nodes for possible cpus which nr_cpus restrics.
> > > This in turn means that proper zonelists are not allocated and the page
> > > allocator blows up.
> > 
> > This looks OK to me.
> > 
> > Could we add a few DEBUG_VM checks that *look* for these invalid
> > zonelists?  Or, would our existing list debugging have caught this?
> 
> Currently we simply blow up because those zonelists are NULL. I do not
> think we have a way to check whether an existing zonelist is actually 
> _correct_ other thatn check it for NULL. But what would we do in the
> later case?
> 
> > Basically, is this bug also a sign that we need better debugging around
> > this?
> 
> My earlier patch had a debugging printk to display the zonelists and
> that might be worthwhile I guess. Basically something like this
> 
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 2e097f336126..c30d59f803fb 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -5259,6 +5259,11 @@ static void build_zonelists(pg_data_t *pgdat)
>  
>  	build_zonelists_in_node_order(pgdat, node_order, nr_nodes);
>  	build_thisnode_zonelists(pgdat);
> +
> +	pr_info("node[%d] zonelist: ", pgdat->node_id);
> +	for_each_zone_zonelist(zone, z, &pgdat->node_zonelists[ZONELIST_FALLBACK], MAX_NR_ZONES-1)
> +		pr_cont("%d:%s ", zone_to_nid(zone), zone->name);
> +	pr_cont("\n");
>  }

Looks like this patch fell through the cracks - any update on this?

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-11 14:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-14  8:24 [RFC PATCH] x86, numa: always initialize all possible nodes Michal Hocko
2019-01-14 10:26 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-01-14 11:48   ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-15  5:32   ` Pingfan Liu
2019-01-24 14:17 ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-24 17:51   ` Mike Rapoport
2019-01-25 10:40     ` Michal Hocko
2019-01-25 19:25       ` Mike Rapoport
2019-01-24 19:10   ` Dave Hansen
2019-01-25 10:50     ` Michal Hocko
2019-02-11 13:49       ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2019-02-11 14:52         ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190211134909.GA107845@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=kernelfans@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).