Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc/vio: drop bus_type from parent device

[Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 11:28:38AM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> [ Added Peter & Greg to Cc ]
> 
> Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@canonical.com> writes:
> > Commit df44b479654f62b478c18ee4d8bc4e9f897a9844 ("kobject: return error
> > code if writing /sys/.../uevent fails") started returning failure when
> > writing to /sys/devices/vio/uevent.
> >
> > This causes an early udevadm trigger to fail. On some installer versions of
> > Ubuntu, this will cause init to exit, thus panicing the system very early
> > during boot.
> >
> > Removing the bus_type from the parent device will remove some of the extra
> > empty files from /sys/devices/vio/, but will keep the rest of the layout
> > for vio devices, keeping them under /sys/devices/vio/.
> 
> What exactly does it change?
> 
> I'm finding it hard to evaluate if this change is going to cause a
> regression somehow.
> 
> I'm also not clear on why removing the bus type is correct, apart from
> whether it fixes the bug you're seeing.
> 
> > It has been tested that uevents for vio devices don't change after this
> > fix, they still contain MODALIAS.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@canonical.com>
> > Fixes: df44b479654f ("kobject: return error code if writing /sys/.../uevent fails")
> 
> AFAICS there haven't been any other fixes for that commit. Do we know
> why it is only vio that was affected? (possibly because it's a fake bus
> to begin with?)

So there was an error previously, the core was ignoring it, and now it
isn't and to fix that you want to remove describing what bus a device is
on?

Huh???

> 
> cheers
> 
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/vio.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/vio.c
> > index 37f1f25ba804..a94dab3972a0 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/vio.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/vio.c
> > @@ -36,7 +36,6 @@ static struct vio_dev vio_bus_device  = { /* fake "parent" device */
> >  	.name = "vio",
> >  	.type = "",
> >  	.dev.init_name = "vio",
> > -	.dev.bus = &vio_bus_type,
> >  };

Wait, a static 'struct device'?  You all are playing with fire there.
That's a reference counted object, and should never be declared like
that at all.

I see you register it, but never unregister it, why?  Why is it even
needed?

And if you remove the bus type of it, it will show up in a different
part of sysfs, so I think this patch will show a user-visable change,
right?

thanks,

greg k-h