linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@canonical.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: cascardo@canonical.com, Peter Rajnoha <prajnoha@redhat.com>,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] powerpc/vio: drop bus_type from parent device
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 11:28:38 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ime56bax.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200406155748.6761-1-cascardo@canonical.com>

[ Added Peter & Greg to Cc ]

Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@canonical.com> writes:
> Commit df44b479654f62b478c18ee4d8bc4e9f897a9844 ("kobject: return error
> code if writing /sys/.../uevent fails") started returning failure when
> writing to /sys/devices/vio/uevent.
>
> This causes an early udevadm trigger to fail. On some installer versions of
> Ubuntu, this will cause init to exit, thus panicing the system very early
> during boot.
>
> Removing the bus_type from the parent device will remove some of the extra
> empty files from /sys/devices/vio/, but will keep the rest of the layout
> for vio devices, keeping them under /sys/devices/vio/.

What exactly does it change?

I'm finding it hard to evaluate if this change is going to cause a
regression somehow.

I'm also not clear on why removing the bus type is correct, apart from
whether it fixes the bug you're seeing.

> It has been tested that uevents for vio devices don't change after this
> fix, they still contain MODALIAS.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@canonical.com>
> Fixes: df44b479654f ("kobject: return error code if writing /sys/.../uevent fails")

AFAICS there haven't been any other fixes for that commit. Do we know
why it is only vio that was affected? (possibly because it's a fake bus
to begin with?)

cheers

> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/vio.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/vio.c
> index 37f1f25ba804..a94dab3972a0 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/vio.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/vio.c
> @@ -36,7 +36,6 @@ static struct vio_dev vio_bus_device  = { /* fake "parent" device */
>  	.name = "vio",
>  	.type = "",
>  	.dev.init_name = "vio",
> -	.dev.bus = &vio_bus_type,
>  };
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_SMLPAR
> -- 
> 2.20.1

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-30  1:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-06 15:57 [PATCH v2] powerpc/vio: drop bus_type from parent device Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2020-07-30  1:28 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2020-07-30  5:37   ` Greg KH
2020-07-30 15:35     ` Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2020-07-31  0:53     ` Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ime56bax.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au \
    --to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=cascardo@canonical.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=prajnoha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).