From: Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@debian.org>
To: balbi@ti.com
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [3.2+] BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0/0x10000100
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:36:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1327595767.2062.7.camel@scapa> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120126163130.GB8665@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 945 bytes --]
On jeu., 2012-01-26 at 18:31 +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > Very odd, it wouldn't seem that this patch would cause such a problem,
> > as it is "obviously" correct.
>
> The funny thing is that I don't think there's any x86 system out there
> with this *DRD* controller :-)
Out of curiosity, what is a DRD controler?
> Specially when you consider the fact that
> it's very recently that we dropped the ARCH dependency with commit
> d242c110c43b55aaf3ebb3ceac1eeab0d452a177
>
> > Kuninori, any thoughts about this? Should I revert this from the
> > tree?
>
> I don't think so, I think this was a bad bisection.
>
Maybe (especially since the first bad commit is a merge commit, so I'm
not completely sure I did correctly the second bisect). But I'm puzzled
why reverting the commit on top of 3.2.1 fixes that. And now that Felipe
mentions it, USB Gadget is not even compiled, so I'm completely lost.
--
Yves-Alexis
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-26 16:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-26 14:22 [3.2+] BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0/0x10000100 Yves-Alexis Perez
2012-01-26 16:15 ` Greg KH
2012-01-26 16:20 ` Yves-Alexis Perez
2012-01-26 16:31 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-01-26 16:36 ` Yves-Alexis Perez [this message]
2012-01-26 16:45 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-01-27 0:27 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2012-01-27 6:36 ` Yves-Alexis Perez
2012-01-30 8:51 ` Yves-Alexis Perez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1327595767.2062.7.camel@scapa \
--to=corsac@debian.org \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).