linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 0/2] ARM CoreLink CCI-550 PMU driver
@ 2015-11-17 18:30 Suzuki K. Poulose
  2015-11-17 18:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm-cci500: Rearrange PMU driver for code sharing with CCI-550 PMU Suzuki K. Poulose
  2015-11-17 18:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm-cci: CoreLink CCI-550 PMU driver Suzuki K. Poulose
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Suzuki K. Poulose @ 2015-11-17 18:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: linux-kernel, arm, mark.rutland, punit.agrawal, Suzuki K. Poulose

This series adds the driver for CCI-550 PMU. CCI-550 PMU shares
most of the attributes (i.e, counters, event code format, event
codes, PMU register file) with that of CCI-500, except for an
additional master interface support (MI6). So, we share most of
the CCI-500 PMU bits except for a CCI-550 specific event validation.

Patch 1 : Renames the shared bits of CCI-500 PMU defintions to
	  CCI5xx, including the Kconfig symbol, which will support both
	  the PMUs.

Patch 2 : Adds the CCI550_PMU driver

Tested on fast model and an FPGA model.

This series is based on :
	4.4-rc1 + [1] + [2]
and is also available at :
	git://linux-arm.org/linux-skp.git cci-updates/4.4-rc1

[1] arm-cci: simplify sysfs attr handling
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-September/373129.html

[2] arm-cci500: Workaround pmu_event_set_period
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-November/385849.html



Suzuki K. Poulose (2):
  arm-cci500: Rearrange PMU driver for code sharing with CCI-550 PMU
  arm-cci: CoreLink CCI-550 PMU driver

 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cci.txt |    2 +
 drivers/bus/Kconfig                           |   10 +-
 drivers/bus/arm-cci.c                         |  303 ++++++++++++++++---------
 3 files changed, 202 insertions(+), 113 deletions(-)

-- 
1.7.9.5


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 1/2] arm-cci500: Rearrange PMU driver for code sharing with CCI-550 PMU
  2015-11-17 18:30 [PATCH 0/2] ARM CoreLink CCI-550 PMU driver Suzuki K. Poulose
@ 2015-11-17 18:30 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
  2015-12-10 15:44   ` Mark Rutland
  2015-12-16 16:55   ` Punit Agrawal
  2015-11-17 18:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm-cci: CoreLink CCI-550 PMU driver Suzuki K. Poulose
  1 sibling, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Suzuki K. Poulose @ 2015-11-17 18:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: linux-kernel, arm, mark.rutland, punit.agrawal, Suzuki K. Poulose

CCI-550 PMU shares most of the CCI-500 PMU attributes including the
event format, PMU event codes. The only difference is an additional
master interface (MI6 - 0xe). Hence we share the driver code for both,
except for a model specific event validate method.
This patch renames the common CCI500 symbols to CCI5xx, including the
Kconfig symbol.

No functional changes to the PMU driver.

Cc: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K. Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
---
 drivers/bus/Kconfig   |    2 +-
 drivers/bus/arm-cci.c |  218 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 2 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 108 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/bus/Kconfig b/drivers/bus/Kconfig
index 116b363..3793f4e 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/bus/Kconfig
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ config ARM_CCI400_PORT_CTRL
 	  Low level power management driver for CCI400 cache coherent
 	  interconnect for ARM platforms.
 
-config ARM_CCI500_PMU
+config ARM_CCI5xx_PMU
 	bool "ARM CCI500 PMU support"
 	depends on (ARM && CPU_V7) || ARM64
 	depends on PERF_EVENTS
diff --git a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
index 6020a02..95e210e 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id arm_cci_matches[] = {
 #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_CCI400_COMMON
 	{.compatible = "arm,cci-400", .data = CCI400_PORTS_DATA },
 #endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_CCI500_PMU
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_CCI5xx_PMU
 	{ .compatible = "arm,cci-500", },
 #endif
 	{},
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id arm_cci_matches[] = {
 enum {
 	CCI_IF_SLAVE,
 	CCI_IF_MASTER,
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_CCI500_PMU
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_CCI5xx_PMU
 	CCI_IF_GLOBAL,
 #endif
 	CCI_IF_MAX,
@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ enum cci_models {
 	CCI400_R0,
 	CCI400_R1,
 #endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_CCI500_PMU
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_CCI5xx_PMU
 	CCI500_R0,
 #endif
 	CCI_MODEL_MAX
@@ -424,73 +424,67 @@ static inline struct cci_pmu_model *probe_cci_model(struct platform_device *pdev
 }
 #endif	/* CONFIG_ARM_CCI400_PMU */
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_CCI500_PMU
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_CCI5xx_PMU
 
 /*
- * CCI500 provides 8 independent event counters that can count
- * any of the events available.
- *
- * CCI500 PMU event id is an 9-bit value made of two parts.
+ * CCI5xx PMU event id is an 9-bit value made of two parts.
  *	 bits [8:5] - Source for the event
- *		      0x0-0x6 - Slave interfaces
- *		      0x8-0xD - Master interfaces
- *		      0xf     - Global Events
- *		      0x7,0xe - Reserved
- *
  *	 bits [4:0] - Event code (specific to type of interface)
+ *
+ *
  */
 
 /* Port ids */
-#define CCI500_PORT_S0			0x0
-#define CCI500_PORT_S1			0x1
-#define CCI500_PORT_S2			0x2
-#define CCI500_PORT_S3			0x3
-#define CCI500_PORT_S4			0x4
-#define CCI500_PORT_S5			0x5
-#define CCI500_PORT_S6			0x6
-
-#define CCI500_PORT_M0			0x8
-#define CCI500_PORT_M1			0x9
-#define CCI500_PORT_M2			0xa
-#define CCI500_PORT_M3			0xb
-#define CCI500_PORT_M4			0xc
-#define CCI500_PORT_M5			0xd
-
-#define CCI500_PORT_GLOBAL 		0xf
-
-#define CCI500_PMU_EVENT_MASK		0x1ffUL
-#define CCI500_PMU_EVENT_SOURCE_SHIFT	0x5
-#define CCI500_PMU_EVENT_SOURCE_MASK	0xf
-#define CCI500_PMU_EVENT_CODE_SHIFT	0x0
-#define CCI500_PMU_EVENT_CODE_MASK	0x1f
-
-#define CCI500_PMU_EVENT_SOURCE(event)	\
-	((event >> CCI500_PMU_EVENT_SOURCE_SHIFT) & CCI500_PMU_EVENT_SOURCE_MASK)
-#define CCI500_PMU_EVENT_CODE(event)	\
-	((event >> CCI500_PMU_EVENT_CODE_SHIFT) & CCI500_PMU_EVENT_CODE_MASK)
-
-#define CCI500_SLAVE_PORT_MIN_EV	0x00
-#define CCI500_SLAVE_PORT_MAX_EV	0x1f
-#define CCI500_MASTER_PORT_MIN_EV	0x00
-#define CCI500_MASTER_PORT_MAX_EV	0x06
-#define CCI500_GLOBAL_PORT_MIN_EV	0x00
-#define CCI500_GLOBAL_PORT_MAX_EV	0x0f
-
-
-#define CCI500_GLOBAL_EVENT_EXT_ATTR_ENTRY(_name, _config) \
-	CCI_EXT_ATTR_ENTRY(_name, cci500_pmu_global_event_show, \
+#define CCI5xx_PORT_S0			0x0
+#define CCI5xx_PORT_S1			0x1
+#define CCI5xx_PORT_S2			0x2
+#define CCI5xx_PORT_S3			0x3
+#define CCI5xx_PORT_S4			0x4
+#define CCI5xx_PORT_S5			0x5
+#define CCI5xx_PORT_S6			0x6
+
+#define CCI5xx_PORT_M0			0x8
+#define CCI5xx_PORT_M1			0x9
+#define CCI5xx_PORT_M2			0xa
+#define CCI5xx_PORT_M3			0xb
+#define CCI5xx_PORT_M4			0xc
+#define CCI5xx_PORT_M5			0xd
+
+#define CCI5xx_PORT_GLOBAL		0xf
+
+#define CCI5xx_PMU_EVENT_MASK		0x1ffUL
+#define CCI5xx_PMU_EVENT_SOURCE_SHIFT	0x5
+#define CCI5xx_PMU_EVENT_SOURCE_MASK	0xf
+#define CCI5xx_PMU_EVENT_CODE_SHIFT	0x0
+#define CCI5xx_PMU_EVENT_CODE_MASK	0x1f
+
+#define CCI5xx_PMU_EVENT_SOURCE(event)	\
+	((event >> CCI5xx_PMU_EVENT_SOURCE_SHIFT) & CCI5xx_PMU_EVENT_SOURCE_MASK)
+#define CCI5xx_PMU_EVENT_CODE(event)	\
+	((event >> CCI5xx_PMU_EVENT_CODE_SHIFT) & CCI5xx_PMU_EVENT_CODE_MASK)
+
+#define CCI5xx_SLAVE_PORT_MIN_EV	0x00
+#define CCI5xx_SLAVE_PORT_MAX_EV	0x1f
+#define CCI5xx_MASTER_PORT_MIN_EV	0x00
+#define CCI5xx_MASTER_PORT_MAX_EV	0x06
+#define CCI5xx_GLOBAL_PORT_MIN_EV	0x00
+#define CCI5xx_GLOBAL_PORT_MAX_EV	0x0f
+
+
+#define CCI5xx_GLOBAL_EVENT_EXT_ATTR_ENTRY(_name, _config) \
+	CCI_EXT_ATTR_ENTRY(_name, cci5xx_pmu_global_event_show, \
 					(unsigned long) _config)
 
-static ssize_t cci500_pmu_global_event_show(struct device *dev,
+static ssize_t cci5xx_pmu_global_event_show(struct device *dev,
 				struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf);
 
-static struct attribute *cci500_pmu_format_attrs[] = {
+static struct attribute *cci5xx_pmu_format_attrs[] = {
 	CCI_FORMAT_EXT_ATTR_ENTRY(event, "config:0-4"),
 	CCI_FORMAT_EXT_ATTR_ENTRY(source, "config:5-8"),
 	NULL,
 };
 
-static struct attribute *cci500_pmu_event_attrs[] = {
+static struct attribute *cci5xx_pmu_event_attrs[] = {
 	/* Slave events */
 	CCI_EVENT_EXT_ATTR_ENTRY(si_rrq_hs_arvalid, 0x0),
 	CCI_EVENT_EXT_ATTR_ENTRY(si_rrq_dev, 0x1),
@@ -535,64 +529,73 @@ static struct attribute *cci500_pmu_event_attrs[] = {
 	CCI_EVENT_EXT_ATTR_ENTRY(mi_w_resp_stall, 0x6),
 
 	/* Global events */
-	CCI500_GLOBAL_EVENT_EXT_ATTR_ENTRY(cci_snoop_access_filter_bank_0_1, 0x0),
-	CCI500_GLOBAL_EVENT_EXT_ATTR_ENTRY(cci_snoop_access_filter_bank_2_3, 0x1),
-	CCI500_GLOBAL_EVENT_EXT_ATTR_ENTRY(cci_snoop_access_filter_bank_4_5, 0x2),
-	CCI500_GLOBAL_EVENT_EXT_ATTR_ENTRY(cci_snoop_access_filter_bank_6_7, 0x3),
-	CCI500_GLOBAL_EVENT_EXT_ATTR_ENTRY(cci_snoop_access_miss_filter_bank_0_1, 0x4),
-	CCI500_GLOBAL_EVENT_EXT_ATTR_ENTRY(cci_snoop_access_miss_filter_bank_2_3, 0x5),
-	CCI500_GLOBAL_EVENT_EXT_ATTR_ENTRY(cci_snoop_access_miss_filter_bank_4_5, 0x6),
-	CCI500_GLOBAL_EVENT_EXT_ATTR_ENTRY(cci_snoop_access_miss_filter_bank_6_7, 0x7),
-	CCI500_GLOBAL_EVENT_EXT_ATTR_ENTRY(cci_snoop_back_invalidation, 0x8),
-	CCI500_GLOBAL_EVENT_EXT_ATTR_ENTRY(cci_snoop_stall_alloc_busy, 0x9),
-	CCI500_GLOBAL_EVENT_EXT_ATTR_ENTRY(cci_snoop_stall_tt_full, 0xA),
-	CCI500_GLOBAL_EVENT_EXT_ATTR_ENTRY(cci_wrq, 0xB),
-	CCI500_GLOBAL_EVENT_EXT_ATTR_ENTRY(cci_snoop_cd_hs, 0xC),
-	CCI500_GLOBAL_EVENT_EXT_ATTR_ENTRY(cci_rq_stall_addr_hazard, 0xD),
-	CCI500_GLOBAL_EVENT_EXT_ATTR_ENTRY(cci_snopp_rq_stall_tt_full, 0xE),
-	CCI500_GLOBAL_EVENT_EXT_ATTR_ENTRY(cci_snoop_rq_tzmp1_prot, 0xF),
+	CCI5xx_GLOBAL_EVENT_EXT_ATTR_ENTRY(cci_snoop_access_filter_bank_0_1, 0x0),
+	CCI5xx_GLOBAL_EVENT_EXT_ATTR_ENTRY(cci_snoop_access_filter_bank_2_3, 0x1),
+	CCI5xx_GLOBAL_EVENT_EXT_ATTR_ENTRY(cci_snoop_access_filter_bank_4_5, 0x2),
+	CCI5xx_GLOBAL_EVENT_EXT_ATTR_ENTRY(cci_snoop_access_filter_bank_6_7, 0x3),
+	CCI5xx_GLOBAL_EVENT_EXT_ATTR_ENTRY(cci_snoop_access_miss_filter_bank_0_1, 0x4),
+	CCI5xx_GLOBAL_EVENT_EXT_ATTR_ENTRY(cci_snoop_access_miss_filter_bank_2_3, 0x5),
+	CCI5xx_GLOBAL_EVENT_EXT_ATTR_ENTRY(cci_snoop_access_miss_filter_bank_4_5, 0x6),
+	CCI5xx_GLOBAL_EVENT_EXT_ATTR_ENTRY(cci_snoop_access_miss_filter_bank_6_7, 0x7),
+	CCI5xx_GLOBAL_EVENT_EXT_ATTR_ENTRY(cci_snoop_back_invalidation, 0x8),
+	CCI5xx_GLOBAL_EVENT_EXT_ATTR_ENTRY(cci_snoop_stall_alloc_busy, 0x9),
+	CCI5xx_GLOBAL_EVENT_EXT_ATTR_ENTRY(cci_snoop_stall_tt_full, 0xA),
+	CCI5xx_GLOBAL_EVENT_EXT_ATTR_ENTRY(cci_wrq, 0xB),
+	CCI5xx_GLOBAL_EVENT_EXT_ATTR_ENTRY(cci_snoop_cd_hs, 0xC),
+	CCI5xx_GLOBAL_EVENT_EXT_ATTR_ENTRY(cci_rq_stall_addr_hazard, 0xD),
+	CCI5xx_GLOBAL_EVENT_EXT_ATTR_ENTRY(cci_snopp_rq_stall_tt_full, 0xE),
+	CCI5xx_GLOBAL_EVENT_EXT_ATTR_ENTRY(cci_snoop_rq_tzmp1_prot, 0xF),
 	NULL
 };
 
-static ssize_t cci500_pmu_global_event_show(struct device *dev,
+static ssize_t cci5xx_pmu_global_event_show(struct device *dev,
 				struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
 {
 	struct dev_ext_attribute *eattr = container_of(attr,
 					struct dev_ext_attribute, attr);
 	/* Global events have single fixed source code */
 	return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "event=0x%lx,source=0x%x\n",
-				(unsigned long)eattr->var, CCI500_PORT_GLOBAL);
+				(unsigned long)eattr->var, CCI5xx_PORT_GLOBAL);
 }
 
+/*
+ * CCI500 provides 8 independent event counters that can count
+ * any of the events available.
+ * CCI500 PMU event source ids
+ *	0x0-0x6 - Slave interfaces
+ *	0x8-0xD - Master interfaces
+ *	0xf     - Global Events
+ *	0x7,0xe - Reserved
+ */
 static int cci500_validate_hw_event(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu,
 					unsigned long hw_event)
 {
-	u32 ev_source = CCI500_PMU_EVENT_SOURCE(hw_event);
-	u32 ev_code = CCI500_PMU_EVENT_CODE(hw_event);
+	u32 ev_source = CCI5xx_PMU_EVENT_SOURCE(hw_event);
+	u32 ev_code = CCI5xx_PMU_EVENT_CODE(hw_event);
 	int if_type;
 
-	if (hw_event & ~CCI500_PMU_EVENT_MASK)
+	if (hw_event & ~CCI5xx_PMU_EVENT_MASK)
 		return -ENOENT;
 
 	switch (ev_source) {
-	case CCI500_PORT_S0:
-	case CCI500_PORT_S1:
-	case CCI500_PORT_S2:
-	case CCI500_PORT_S3:
-	case CCI500_PORT_S4:
-	case CCI500_PORT_S5:
-	case CCI500_PORT_S6:
+	case CCI5xx_PORT_S0:
+	case CCI5xx_PORT_S1:
+	case CCI5xx_PORT_S2:
+	case CCI5xx_PORT_S3:
+	case CCI5xx_PORT_S4:
+	case CCI5xx_PORT_S5:
+	case CCI5xx_PORT_S6:
 		if_type = CCI_IF_SLAVE;
 		break;
-	case CCI500_PORT_M0:
-	case CCI500_PORT_M1:
-	case CCI500_PORT_M2:
-	case CCI500_PORT_M3:
-	case CCI500_PORT_M4:
-	case CCI500_PORT_M5:
+	case CCI5xx_PORT_M0:
+	case CCI5xx_PORT_M1:
+	case CCI5xx_PORT_M2:
+	case CCI5xx_PORT_M3:
+	case CCI5xx_PORT_M4:
+	case CCI5xx_PORT_M5:
 		if_type = CCI_IF_MASTER;
 		break;
-	case CCI500_PORT_GLOBAL:
+	case CCI5xx_PORT_GLOBAL:
 		if_type = CCI_IF_GLOBAL;
 		break;
 	default:
@@ -605,7 +608,8 @@ static int cci500_validate_hw_event(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu,
 
 	return -ENOENT;
 }
-#endif	/* CONFIG_ARM_CCI500_PMU */
+
+#endif	/* CONFIG_ARM_CCI5xx_PMU */
 
 static ssize_t cci_pmu_format_show(struct device *dev,
 			struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
@@ -835,7 +839,7 @@ static void __pmu_write_counter(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu, u32 value, int idx)
 	pmu_write_register(cci_pmu, value, idx, CCI_PMU_CNTR);
 }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_CCI500_PMU
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_CCI5xx_PMU
 
 /*
  * CCI-500 has advanced power saving policies, which could gate the
@@ -860,16 +864,16 @@ static void __pmu_write_counter(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu, u32 value, int idx)
  * assigned a valid code for step(2). We use the highest possible
  * event code (0x1f) for the master interface 0.
  */
-#define CCI500_INVALID_EVENT	((CCI500_PORT_M0 << CCI500_PMU_EVENT_SOURCE_SHIFT) | \
-				 (CCI500_PMU_EVENT_CODE_MASK << CCI500_PMU_EVENT_CODE_SHIFT))
-static void cci500_pmu_write_counter(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu, u32 value, int idx)
+#define CCI5xx_INVALID_EVENT	((CCI5xx_PORT_M0 << CCI5xx_PMU_EVENT_SOURCE_SHIFT) | \
+				 (CCI5xx_PMU_EVENT_CODE_MASK << CCI5xx_PMU_EVENT_CODE_SHIFT))
+static void cci5xx_pmu_write_counter(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu, u32 value, int idx)
 {
 	unsigned long mask[BITS_TO_LONGS(cci_pmu->num_cntrs)];
 	u32 event;
 
 	pmu_disable_counters(cci_pmu, mask);
 	event = pmu_get_event(cci_pmu, idx);
-	pmu_set_event(cci_pmu, idx, CCI500_INVALID_EVENT);
+	pmu_set_event(cci_pmu, idx, CCI5xx_INVALID_EVENT);
 	pmu_enable_counter(cci_pmu, idx);
 	__cci_pmu_enable();
 	__pmu_write_counter(cci_pmu, value, idx);
@@ -879,7 +883,7 @@ static void cci500_pmu_write_counter(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu, u32 value, int idx
 	pmu_restore_counters(cci_pmu, mask);
 }
 
-#endif	/* CONFIG_ARM_CCI500_PMU */
+#endif	/* CONFIG_ARM_CCI5xx_PMU */
 
 static void pmu_write_counter(struct perf_event *event, u32 value)
 {
@@ -1445,30 +1449,30 @@ static struct cci_pmu_model cci_pmu_models[] = {
 		.get_event_idx = cci400_get_event_idx,
 	},
 #endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_CCI500_PMU
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_CCI5xx_PMU
 	[CCI500_R0] = {
 		.name = "CCI_500",
 		.fixed_hw_cntrs = 0,
 		.num_hw_cntrs = 8,
 		.cntr_size = SZ_64K,
-		.format_attrs = cci500_pmu_format_attrs,
-		.event_attrs = cci500_pmu_event_attrs,
+		.format_attrs = cci5xx_pmu_format_attrs,
+		.event_attrs = cci5xx_pmu_event_attrs,
 		.event_ranges = {
 			[CCI_IF_SLAVE] = {
-				CCI500_SLAVE_PORT_MIN_EV,
-				CCI500_SLAVE_PORT_MAX_EV,
+				CCI5xx_SLAVE_PORT_MIN_EV,
+				CCI5xx_SLAVE_PORT_MAX_EV,
 			},
 			[CCI_IF_MASTER] = {
-				CCI500_MASTER_PORT_MIN_EV,
-				CCI500_MASTER_PORT_MAX_EV,
+				CCI5xx_MASTER_PORT_MIN_EV,
+				CCI5xx_MASTER_PORT_MAX_EV,
 			},
 			[CCI_IF_GLOBAL] = {
-				CCI500_GLOBAL_PORT_MIN_EV,
-				CCI500_GLOBAL_PORT_MAX_EV,
+				CCI5xx_GLOBAL_PORT_MIN_EV,
+				CCI5xx_GLOBAL_PORT_MAX_EV,
 			},
 		},
 		.validate_hw_event = cci500_validate_hw_event,
-		.write_counter	= cci500_pmu_write_counter,
+		.write_counter	= cci5xx_pmu_write_counter,
 	},
 #endif
 };
@@ -1488,7 +1492,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id arm_cci_pmu_matches[] = {
 		.data	= &cci_pmu_models[CCI400_R1],
 	},
 #endif
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_CCI500_PMU
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_CCI5xx_PMU
 	{
 		.compatible = "arm,cci-500-pmu,r0",
 		.data = &cci_pmu_models[CCI500_R0],
-- 
1.7.9.5


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/2] arm-cci: CoreLink CCI-550 PMU driver
  2015-11-17 18:30 [PATCH 0/2] ARM CoreLink CCI-550 PMU driver Suzuki K. Poulose
  2015-11-17 18:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm-cci500: Rearrange PMU driver for code sharing with CCI-550 PMU Suzuki K. Poulose
@ 2015-11-17 18:30 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
  2015-12-10 15:46   ` Mark Rutland
  2015-12-16 17:00   ` Punit Agrawal
  1 sibling, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Suzuki K. Poulose @ 2015-11-17 18:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel
  Cc: linux-kernel, arm, mark.rutland, punit.agrawal, Suzuki K. Poulose

Add ARM CoreLink CCI-550  cache coherent interconnect PMU
driver support. The CCI-550 PMU shares all the attributes of CCI-500
PMU, except for an additional master interface (MI-6 - 0xe).
CCI-550 requires the same work around as for CCI-500 to
write to the PMU counter.

Cc: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K. Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cci.txt |    2 +
 drivers/bus/Kconfig                           |    8 +--
 drivers/bus/arm-cci.c                         |   85 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 3 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cci.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cci.txt
index aef1d20..a1a5a7e 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cci.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cci.txt
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ specific to ARM.
 		Definition: must contain one of the following:
 			    "arm,cci-400"
 			    "arm,cci-500"
+			    "arm,cci-550"
 
 	- reg
 		Usage: required
@@ -101,6 +102,7 @@ specific to ARM.
 				 "arm,cci-400-pmu"  - DEPRECATED, permitted only where OS has
 						      secure acces to CCI registers
 				 "arm,cci-500-pmu,r0"
+				 "arm,cci-550-pmu,r0"
 		- reg:
 			Usage: required
 			Value type: Integer cells. A register entry, expressed
diff --git a/drivers/bus/Kconfig b/drivers/bus/Kconfig
index 3793f4e..54c030b 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/bus/Kconfig
@@ -35,14 +35,14 @@ config ARM_CCI400_PORT_CTRL
 	  interconnect for ARM platforms.
 
 config ARM_CCI5xx_PMU
-	bool "ARM CCI500 PMU support"
+	bool "ARM CCI-500/CCI-550 PMU support"
 	depends on (ARM && CPU_V7) || ARM64
 	depends on PERF_EVENTS
 	select ARM_CCI_PMU
 	help
-	  Support for PMU events monitoring on the ARM CCI-500 cache coherent
-	  interconnect. CCI-500 provides 8 independent event counters, which
-	  can count events pertaining to the slave/master interfaces as well
+	  Support for PMU events monitoring on the ARM CCI-500/CCI-550 cache
+	  coherent interconnects. Both of them provide 8 independent event counters,
+	  which can count events pertaining to the slave/master interfaces as well
 	  as the internal events to the CCI.
 
 	  If unsure, say Y
diff --git a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
index 95e210e..991ac7e 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id arm_cci_matches[] = {
 #endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_CCI5xx_PMU
 	{ .compatible = "arm,cci-500", },
+	{ .compatible = "arm,cci-550", },
 #endif
 	{},
 };
@@ -156,6 +157,7 @@ enum cci_models {
 #endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_CCI5xx_PMU
 	CCI500_R0,
+	CCI550_R0,
 #endif
 	CCI_MODEL_MAX
 };
@@ -449,6 +451,7 @@ static inline struct cci_pmu_model *probe_cci_model(struct platform_device *pdev
 #define CCI5xx_PORT_M3			0xb
 #define CCI5xx_PORT_M4			0xc
 #define CCI5xx_PORT_M5			0xd
+#define CCI5xx_PORT_M6			0xe
 
 #define CCI5xx_PORT_GLOBAL		0xf
 
@@ -609,6 +612,58 @@ static int cci500_validate_hw_event(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu,
 	return -ENOENT;
 }
 
+/*
+ * CCI550 provides 8 independent event counters that can count
+ * any of the events available.
+ * CCI550 PMU event source ids
+ *	0x0-0x6 - Slave interfaces
+ *	0x8-0xe - Master interfaces
+ *	0xf     - Global Events
+ *	0x7	- Reserved
+ */
+static int cci550_validate_hw_event(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu,
+					unsigned long hw_event)
+{
+	u32 ev_source = CCI5xx_PMU_EVENT_SOURCE(hw_event);
+	u32 ev_code = CCI5xx_PMU_EVENT_CODE(hw_event);
+	int if_type;
+
+	if (hw_event & ~CCI5xx_PMU_EVENT_MASK)
+		return -ENOENT;
+
+	switch (ev_source) {
+	case CCI5xx_PORT_S0:
+	case CCI5xx_PORT_S1:
+	case CCI5xx_PORT_S2:
+	case CCI5xx_PORT_S3:
+	case CCI5xx_PORT_S4:
+	case CCI5xx_PORT_S5:
+	case CCI5xx_PORT_S6:
+		if_type = CCI_IF_SLAVE;
+		break;
+	case CCI5xx_PORT_M0:
+	case CCI5xx_PORT_M1:
+	case CCI5xx_PORT_M2:
+	case CCI5xx_PORT_M3:
+	case CCI5xx_PORT_M4:
+	case CCI5xx_PORT_M5:
+	case CCI5xx_PORT_M6:
+		if_type = CCI_IF_MASTER;
+		break;
+	case CCI5xx_PORT_GLOBAL:
+		if_type = CCI_IF_GLOBAL;
+		break;
+	default:
+		return -ENOENT;
+	}
+
+	if (ev_code >= cci_pmu->model->event_ranges[if_type].min &&
+		ev_code <= cci_pmu->model->event_ranges[if_type].max)
+		return hw_event;
+
+	return -ENOENT;
+}
+
 #endif	/* CONFIG_ARM_CCI5xx_PMU */
 
 static ssize_t cci_pmu_format_show(struct device *dev,
@@ -842,7 +897,7 @@ static void __pmu_write_counter(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu, u32 value, int idx)
 #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_CCI5xx_PMU
 
 /*
- * CCI-500 has advanced power saving policies, which could gate the
+ * CCI-500/CCI-550 has advanced power saving policies, which could gate the
  * clocks to the PMU counters, which makes the writes to them ineffective.
  * The only way to write to those counters is when the global counters
  * are enabled and the particular counter is enabled.
@@ -1474,6 +1529,30 @@ static struct cci_pmu_model cci_pmu_models[] = {
 		.validate_hw_event = cci500_validate_hw_event,
 		.write_counter	= cci5xx_pmu_write_counter,
 	},
+	[CCI550_R0] = {
+		.name = "CCI_550",
+		.fixed_hw_cntrs = 0,
+		.num_hw_cntrs = 8,
+		.cntr_size = SZ_64K,
+		.format_attrs = cci5xx_pmu_format_attrs,
+		.event_attrs = cci5xx_pmu_event_attrs,
+		.event_ranges = {
+			[CCI_IF_SLAVE] = {
+				CCI5xx_SLAVE_PORT_MIN_EV,
+				CCI5xx_SLAVE_PORT_MAX_EV,
+			},
+			[CCI_IF_MASTER] = {
+				CCI5xx_MASTER_PORT_MIN_EV,
+				CCI5xx_MASTER_PORT_MAX_EV,
+			},
+			[CCI_IF_GLOBAL] = {
+				CCI5xx_GLOBAL_PORT_MIN_EV,
+				CCI5xx_GLOBAL_PORT_MAX_EV,
+			},
+		},
+		.validate_hw_event = cci550_validate_hw_event,
+		.write_counter	= cci5xx_pmu_write_counter,
+	},
 #endif
 };
 
@@ -1497,6 +1576,10 @@ static const struct of_device_id arm_cci_pmu_matches[] = {
 		.compatible = "arm,cci-500-pmu,r0",
 		.data = &cci_pmu_models[CCI500_R0],
 	},
+	{
+		.compatible = "arm,cci-550-pmu,r0",
+		.data = &cci_pmu_models[CCI550_R0],
+	},
 #endif
 	{},
 };
-- 
1.7.9.5


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm-cci500: Rearrange PMU driver for code sharing with CCI-550 PMU
  2015-11-17 18:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm-cci500: Rearrange PMU driver for code sharing with CCI-550 PMU Suzuki K. Poulose
@ 2015-12-10 15:44   ` Mark Rutland
  2015-12-16 16:55   ` Punit Agrawal
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Mark Rutland @ 2015-12-10 15:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Suzuki K. Poulose; +Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, arm, punit.agrawal

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 06:30:39PM +0000, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
> CCI-550 PMU shares most of the CCI-500 PMU attributes including the
> event format, PMU event codes. The only difference is an additional
> master interface (MI6 - 0xe). Hence we share the driver code for both,
> except for a model specific event validate method.
> This patch renames the common CCI500 symbols to CCI5xx, including the
> Kconfig symbol.
> 
> No functional changes to the PMU driver.
> 
> Cc: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K. Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/bus/Kconfig   |    2 +-
>  drivers/bus/arm-cci.c |  218 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>  2 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 108 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

Mark.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm-cci: CoreLink CCI-550 PMU driver
  2015-11-17 18:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm-cci: CoreLink CCI-550 PMU driver Suzuki K. Poulose
@ 2015-12-10 15:46   ` Mark Rutland
  2015-12-16 17:00   ` Punit Agrawal
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Mark Rutland @ 2015-12-10 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Suzuki K. Poulose; +Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, arm, punit.agrawal

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 06:30:40PM +0000, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
> Add ARM CoreLink CCI-550  cache coherent interconnect PMU
> driver support. The CCI-550 PMU shares all the attributes of CCI-500
> PMU, except for an additional master interface (MI-6 - 0xe).
> CCI-550 requires the same work around as for CCI-500 to
> write to the PMU counter.
> 
> Cc: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K. Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cci.txt |    2 +
>  drivers/bus/Kconfig                           |    8 +--
>  drivers/bus/arm-cci.c                         |   85 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  3 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

Mark.

> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cci.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cci.txt
> index aef1d20..a1a5a7e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cci.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cci.txt
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ specific to ARM.
>  		Definition: must contain one of the following:
>  			    "arm,cci-400"
>  			    "arm,cci-500"
> +			    "arm,cci-550"
>  
>  	- reg
>  		Usage: required
> @@ -101,6 +102,7 @@ specific to ARM.
>  				 "arm,cci-400-pmu"  - DEPRECATED, permitted only where OS has
>  						      secure acces to CCI registers
>  				 "arm,cci-500-pmu,r0"
> +				 "arm,cci-550-pmu,r0"
>  		- reg:
>  			Usage: required
>  			Value type: Integer cells. A register entry, expressed
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/Kconfig b/drivers/bus/Kconfig
> index 3793f4e..54c030b 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/bus/Kconfig
> @@ -35,14 +35,14 @@ config ARM_CCI400_PORT_CTRL
>  	  interconnect for ARM platforms.
>  
>  config ARM_CCI5xx_PMU
> -	bool "ARM CCI500 PMU support"
> +	bool "ARM CCI-500/CCI-550 PMU support"
>  	depends on (ARM && CPU_V7) || ARM64
>  	depends on PERF_EVENTS
>  	select ARM_CCI_PMU
>  	help
> -	  Support for PMU events monitoring on the ARM CCI-500 cache coherent
> -	  interconnect. CCI-500 provides 8 independent event counters, which
> -	  can count events pertaining to the slave/master interfaces as well
> +	  Support for PMU events monitoring on the ARM CCI-500/CCI-550 cache
> +	  coherent interconnects. Both of them provide 8 independent event counters,
> +	  which can count events pertaining to the slave/master interfaces as well
>  	  as the internal events to the CCI.
>  
>  	  If unsure, say Y
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
> index 95e210e..991ac7e 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
> @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id arm_cci_matches[] = {
>  #endif
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_CCI5xx_PMU
>  	{ .compatible = "arm,cci-500", },
> +	{ .compatible = "arm,cci-550", },
>  #endif
>  	{},
>  };
> @@ -156,6 +157,7 @@ enum cci_models {
>  #endif
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_CCI5xx_PMU
>  	CCI500_R0,
> +	CCI550_R0,
>  #endif
>  	CCI_MODEL_MAX
>  };
> @@ -449,6 +451,7 @@ static inline struct cci_pmu_model *probe_cci_model(struct platform_device *pdev
>  #define CCI5xx_PORT_M3			0xb
>  #define CCI5xx_PORT_M4			0xc
>  #define CCI5xx_PORT_M5			0xd
> +#define CCI5xx_PORT_M6			0xe
>  
>  #define CCI5xx_PORT_GLOBAL		0xf
>  
> @@ -609,6 +612,58 @@ static int cci500_validate_hw_event(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu,
>  	return -ENOENT;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * CCI550 provides 8 independent event counters that can count
> + * any of the events available.
> + * CCI550 PMU event source ids
> + *	0x0-0x6 - Slave interfaces
> + *	0x8-0xe - Master interfaces
> + *	0xf     - Global Events
> + *	0x7	- Reserved
> + */
> +static int cci550_validate_hw_event(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu,
> +					unsigned long hw_event)
> +{
> +	u32 ev_source = CCI5xx_PMU_EVENT_SOURCE(hw_event);
> +	u32 ev_code = CCI5xx_PMU_EVENT_CODE(hw_event);
> +	int if_type;
> +
> +	if (hw_event & ~CCI5xx_PMU_EVENT_MASK)
> +		return -ENOENT;
> +
> +	switch (ev_source) {
> +	case CCI5xx_PORT_S0:
> +	case CCI5xx_PORT_S1:
> +	case CCI5xx_PORT_S2:
> +	case CCI5xx_PORT_S3:
> +	case CCI5xx_PORT_S4:
> +	case CCI5xx_PORT_S5:
> +	case CCI5xx_PORT_S6:
> +		if_type = CCI_IF_SLAVE;
> +		break;
> +	case CCI5xx_PORT_M0:
> +	case CCI5xx_PORT_M1:
> +	case CCI5xx_PORT_M2:
> +	case CCI5xx_PORT_M3:
> +	case CCI5xx_PORT_M4:
> +	case CCI5xx_PORT_M5:
> +	case CCI5xx_PORT_M6:
> +		if_type = CCI_IF_MASTER;
> +		break;
> +	case CCI5xx_PORT_GLOBAL:
> +		if_type = CCI_IF_GLOBAL;
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		return -ENOENT;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (ev_code >= cci_pmu->model->event_ranges[if_type].min &&
> +		ev_code <= cci_pmu->model->event_ranges[if_type].max)
> +		return hw_event;
> +
> +	return -ENOENT;
> +}
> +
>  #endif	/* CONFIG_ARM_CCI5xx_PMU */
>  
>  static ssize_t cci_pmu_format_show(struct device *dev,
> @@ -842,7 +897,7 @@ static void __pmu_write_counter(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu, u32 value, int idx)
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_CCI5xx_PMU
>  
>  /*
> - * CCI-500 has advanced power saving policies, which could gate the
> + * CCI-500/CCI-550 has advanced power saving policies, which could gate the
>   * clocks to the PMU counters, which makes the writes to them ineffective.
>   * The only way to write to those counters is when the global counters
>   * are enabled and the particular counter is enabled.
> @@ -1474,6 +1529,30 @@ static struct cci_pmu_model cci_pmu_models[] = {
>  		.validate_hw_event = cci500_validate_hw_event,
>  		.write_counter	= cci5xx_pmu_write_counter,
>  	},
> +	[CCI550_R0] = {
> +		.name = "CCI_550",
> +		.fixed_hw_cntrs = 0,
> +		.num_hw_cntrs = 8,
> +		.cntr_size = SZ_64K,
> +		.format_attrs = cci5xx_pmu_format_attrs,
> +		.event_attrs = cci5xx_pmu_event_attrs,
> +		.event_ranges = {
> +			[CCI_IF_SLAVE] = {
> +				CCI5xx_SLAVE_PORT_MIN_EV,
> +				CCI5xx_SLAVE_PORT_MAX_EV,
> +			},
> +			[CCI_IF_MASTER] = {
> +				CCI5xx_MASTER_PORT_MIN_EV,
> +				CCI5xx_MASTER_PORT_MAX_EV,
> +			},
> +			[CCI_IF_GLOBAL] = {
> +				CCI5xx_GLOBAL_PORT_MIN_EV,
> +				CCI5xx_GLOBAL_PORT_MAX_EV,
> +			},
> +		},
> +		.validate_hw_event = cci550_validate_hw_event,
> +		.write_counter	= cci5xx_pmu_write_counter,
> +	},
>  #endif
>  };
>  
> @@ -1497,6 +1576,10 @@ static const struct of_device_id arm_cci_pmu_matches[] = {
>  		.compatible = "arm,cci-500-pmu,r0",
>  		.data = &cci_pmu_models[CCI500_R0],
>  	},
> +	{
> +		.compatible = "arm,cci-550-pmu,r0",
> +		.data = &cci_pmu_models[CCI550_R0],
> +	},
>  #endif
>  	{},
>  };
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm-cci500: Rearrange PMU driver for code sharing with CCI-550 PMU
  2015-11-17 18:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm-cci500: Rearrange PMU driver for code sharing with CCI-550 PMU Suzuki K. Poulose
  2015-12-10 15:44   ` Mark Rutland
@ 2015-12-16 16:55   ` Punit Agrawal
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Punit Agrawal @ 2015-12-16 16:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Suzuki K. Poulose; +Cc: linux-arm-kernel, mark.rutland, arm, linux-kernel

"Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> writes:

> CCI-550 PMU shares most of the CCI-500 PMU attributes including the
> event format, PMU event codes. The only difference is an additional
> master interface (MI6 - 0xe). Hence we share the driver code for both,
> except for a model specific event validate method.
> This patch renames the common CCI500 symbols to CCI5xx, including the
> Kconfig symbol.
>
> No functional changes to the PMU driver.
>
> Cc: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K. Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/bus/Kconfig   |    2 +-
>  drivers/bus/arm-cci.c |  218 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>  2 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 108 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>

Thanks,
Punit

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm-cci: CoreLink CCI-550 PMU driver
  2015-11-17 18:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm-cci: CoreLink CCI-550 PMU driver Suzuki K. Poulose
  2015-12-10 15:46   ` Mark Rutland
@ 2015-12-16 17:00   ` Punit Agrawal
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Punit Agrawal @ 2015-12-16 17:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Suzuki K. Poulose; +Cc: linux-arm-kernel, mark.rutland, arm, linux-kernel

"Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> writes:

> Add ARM CoreLink CCI-550  cache coherent interconnect PMU
> driver support. The CCI-550 PMU shares all the attributes of CCI-500
> PMU, except for an additional master interface (MI-6 - 0xe).
> CCI-550 requires the same work around as for CCI-500 to
> write to the PMU counter.
>
> Cc: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K. Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cci.txt |    2 +
>  drivers/bus/Kconfig                           |    8 +--
>  drivers/bus/arm-cci.c                         |   85 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  3 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>

Thanks,
Punit

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-12-16 17:01 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-11-17 18:30 [PATCH 0/2] ARM CoreLink CCI-550 PMU driver Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-11-17 18:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm-cci500: Rearrange PMU driver for code sharing with CCI-550 PMU Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-10 15:44   ` Mark Rutland
2015-12-16 16:55   ` Punit Agrawal
2015-11-17 18:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm-cci: CoreLink CCI-550 PMU driver Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-10 15:46   ` Mark Rutland
2015-12-16 17:00   ` Punit Agrawal

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).