From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: "Van De Ven, Arjan" <arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
"Liran Alon" <liran.alon@oracle.com>,
"Laura Abbott" <labbott@redhat.com>,
"Andrew Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
"Janakarajan Natarajan" <Janakarajan.Natarajan@amd.com>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@suse.de>,
"Mallick, Asit K" <asit.k.mallick@intel.com>,
"Radim Krcmár" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
"KarimAllah Ahmed" <karahmed@amazon.de>,
"Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
"Tim Chen" <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Masami Hiramatsu" <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
"Tom Lendacky" <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"Joerg Roedel" <joro@8bytes.org>,
"Andrea Arcangeli" <aarcange@redhat.com>,
"KVM list" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 09/10] x86/enter: Create macros to restrict/unrestrict Indirect Branch Speculation
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 18:53:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1516992793.30244.280.camel@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0575AF4FD06DD142AD198903C74E1CC87A601040@ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 841 bytes --]
On Fri, 2018-01-26 at 18:44 +0000, Van De Ven, Arjan wrote:
> your question was specific to RSB not BTB. But please show the empirical evidence for RSB ?
We were hypothesising, which should have been clear from:
On Fri, 2018-01-26 at 09:11 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Likewise if the RSB only stores the low 31 bits of the target, SMEP
> isn't much help there either.
>
> Do we need to look again at the fact that we've disabled the RSB-
> stuffing for SMEP?
... and later...
On Fri, 2018-01-26 at 17:31 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> Note, we've switched from talking about BTB to RSB here, so this is a
> valid concern if the *RSB* only has the low bits of the target.
I'm glad to hear that it *isn't* a valid concern for the RSB and the
code in Linus' tree is correct.
Thank you for clearing that up.
[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 5213 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-26 18:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-26 2:11 [RFC 09/10] x86/enter: Create macros to restrict/unrestrict Indirect Branch Speculation Liran Alon
2018-01-26 2:23 ` Dave Hansen
2018-01-26 9:11 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-26 17:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-01-26 17:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-26 17:29 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-26 17:31 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-26 17:59 ` Andi Kleen
2018-01-26 18:11 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-26 18:12 ` Arjan van de Ven
2018-01-26 18:26 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-26 18:28 ` Van De Ven, Arjan
2018-01-26 18:43 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-26 18:44 ` Van De Ven, Arjan
2018-01-26 18:53 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2018-01-26 19:02 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-01-26 19:11 ` Hansen, Dave
2018-01-27 13:42 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-01-27 15:55 ` Dave Hansen
2018-01-26 19:11 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-26 8:46 ` David Woodhouse
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-01-26 2:50 Liran Alon
2018-01-26 2:55 ` Van De Ven, Arjan
2018-01-23 11:13 Liran Alon
2018-01-25 22:20 ` Dave Hansen
2018-01-22 22:15 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2018-01-20 19:22 [RFC 00/10] Speculation Control feature support KarimAllah Ahmed
2018-01-20 19:23 ` [RFC 09/10] x86/enter: Create macros to restrict/unrestrict Indirect Branch Speculation KarimAllah Ahmed
2018-01-21 19:14 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-01-23 16:12 ` Tom Lendacky
2018-01-23 16:20 ` Woodhouse, David
2018-01-23 22:37 ` Tom Lendacky
2018-01-23 22:49 ` Andi Kleen
2018-01-23 23:14 ` Woodhouse, David
2018-01-23 23:22 ` Andi Kleen
2018-01-24 0:47 ` Tim Chen
2018-01-24 1:00 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-01-24 1:22 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-24 1:59 ` Van De Ven, Arjan
2018-01-24 3:25 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-01-21 19:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-01-21 20:28 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-21 21:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-01-21 22:00 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-21 22:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-01-22 16:27 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-23 7:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-01-23 7:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-01-23 9:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-01-23 9:37 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-23 15:01 ` Dave Hansen
2018-01-23 9:30 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-23 10:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-01-23 10:27 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-23 10:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-01-23 10:57 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-23 10:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-01-23 10:35 ` David Woodhouse
2018-02-04 18:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-02-04 20:22 ` David Woodhouse
2018-02-06 9:14 ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-25 16:19 ` Mason
2018-01-25 17:16 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-01-29 11:59 ` Mason
2018-01-24 0:05 ` Andi Kleen
2018-01-23 20:16 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1516992793.30244.280.camel@infradead.org \
--to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=Janakarajan.Natarajan@amd.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=asit.k.mallick@intel.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=karahmed@amazon.de \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liran.alon@oracle.com \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).