From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Patrick Mochel <mochel@osdl.org>,
torvalds@osdl.org, kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PM] Patrick: which part of "maintainer" and "peer review" needs explaining to you?
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 19:41:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030902174126.GB14209@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030901120208.GC1358@openzaurus.ucw.cz>
On Mon, Sep 01 2003, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > I think we need to expand the platform device support to include the
> > notion of platform drivers. For example:
> >
> > struct platform_driver {
> > int (*probe)(struct platform_device *);
> > int (*remove)(struct platform_device *);
> > int (*suspend)(struct platform_device *, u32);
> > int (*resume)(struct platform_device *);
> > struct device_driver drv;
> > };
> >
> > (Aside: I like the movement of the suspend/resume methods to the bus_type,
> > and I'd like to see the probe/remove methods also move there. For the
> > vast majority of cases, the probe/remove methods in struct device_driver
> > end up pointing at the same functions for any particular bus.)
>
> But what about those few devices that need special handling? Like
> flush write cache on IDE disk but not on cdrom?
ide-cd should have a flush write cache as well, for mtr, dvd-ram, cd-rw
with packet writing, etc.
--
Jens Axboe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Mon, Sep 01 2003, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > I think we need to expand the platform device support to include the
> > notion of platform drivers. For example:
> >
> > struct platform_driver {
> > int (*probe)(struct platform_device *);
> > int (*remove)(struct platform_device *);
> > int (*suspend)(struct platform_device *, u32);
> > int (*resume)(struct platform_device *);
> > struct device_driver drv;
> > };
> >
> > (Aside: I like the movement of the suspend/resume methods to the bus_type,
> > and I'd like to see the probe/remove methods also move there. For the
> > vast majority of cases, the probe/remove methods in struct device_driver
> > end up pointing at the same functions for any particular bus.)
>
> But what about those few devices that need special handling? Like
> flush write cache on IDE disk but not on cdrom?
ide-cd should have a flush write cache as well, for mtr, dvd-ram, cd-rw
with packet writing, etc.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-02 18:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-22 21:08 [PM] Patrick: which part of "maintainer" and "peer review" needs explaining to you? Pavel Machek
2003-08-22 21:25 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-08-22 21:53 ` Pavel Machek
2003-08-22 22:05 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-08-23 1:03 ` Nigel Cunningham
2003-08-23 16:22 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-08-25 19:05 ` [PM] powering down special devices Patrick Mochel
2003-08-25 19:53 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-08-25 9:52 ` [PM] Patrick: which part of "maintainer" and "peer review" needs explaining to you? Pavel Machek
2003-08-22 22:10 ` Pavel Machek
2003-08-22 22:13 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-08-22 22:17 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-08-22 22:36 ` Pavel Machek
2003-08-23 10:47 ` Russell King
2003-08-24 11:54 ` Russell King
2003-08-26 15:39 ` [PM] Config Options Patrick Mochel
2003-08-24 12:08 ` [PM] Patrick: which part of "maintainer" and "peer review" needs explaining to you? Russell King
2003-08-25 15:47 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-08-25 16:27 ` Russell King
2003-08-25 16:57 ` Matt Porter
2003-08-25 17:14 ` Russell King
2003-08-25 17:34 ` Matt Porter
2003-08-28 15:38 ` Platform Devices Patrick Mochel
2003-09-01 12:02 ` [PM] Patrick: which part of "maintainer" and "peer review" needs explaining to you? Pavel Machek
2003-09-02 17:41 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2003-09-09 20:19 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2003-09-09 20:24 ` Jens Axboe
2003-09-09 21:43 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-09 22:54 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-09 23:07 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-09 23:07 ` [PM] Passing suspend level down to drivers Pavel Machek
2003-09-09 23:23 ` Patrick Mochel
2003-09-10 0:06 ` Pavel Machek
2003-09-10 6:12 ` Stephen Rothwell
2003-09-10 11:48 ` Alan Cox
2003-09-09 23:15 ` [PM] Patrick: which part of "maintainer" and "peer review" needs explaining to you? Alan Cox
2003-09-09 22:56 ` Pavel Machek
2003-08-25 17:16 ` Russell King
2003-08-22 22:04 ` Timothy Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030902174126.GB14209@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mochel@osdl.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).