From: Mason <slash.tmp@free.fr>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>,
David Laight <david.laight@aculab.com>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Thibaud Cornic <thibaud_cornic@sigmadesigns.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v0.2] PCI: Add support for tango PCIe host bridge
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 10:20:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2003d851-e17e-1a43-3889-ec6e79e635e3@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87d48d57-5f9f-1b35-99da-ab39de2d3d48@free.fr>
On 19/04/2017 13:19, Mason wrote:
> My biggest problem is that tango_unmask() is never called.
FTR, the missing incantation was:
Explicitly calling tango_{mask/unmask/ack} from the corresponding msi_{mask/unmask/ack}
Marc, I have one nagging doubt, wrt splitting MSI line selection
and MSI enable.
tango_irq_domain_alloc : finds an available MSI 'j' to allocate
tango_irq_domain_free : release MSI 'j'
tango_unmask : enable MSI 'j'
tango_mask : disable MSI 'j'
Is the following scenario guaranteed to never happen?
tango_irq_domain_alloc // alloc 0
tango_irq_domain_free // free 0
tango_irq_domain_alloc // alloc 0
tango_unmask // enable 0
tango_unmask // enable 0 = NOP
tango_mask // disable 0
In this theoretical scenario, we would be left with a non-functional
MSI 0.
Regards.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-20 8:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-23 13:05 [RFC PATCH v0.2] PCI: Add support for tango PCIe host bridge Mason
2017-03-23 14:22 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-03-23 17:03 ` Mason
2017-03-23 23:40 ` Mason
2017-03-24 18:22 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-03-27 14:35 ` Mason
2017-03-27 14:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-03-27 15:18 ` Mason
2017-03-24 18:47 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-03-27 15:53 ` Mason
2017-03-27 17:09 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-03-27 19:44 ` Mason
2017-03-27 21:07 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-03-27 22:04 ` Mason
2017-03-28 8:21 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-04-11 15:13 ` Mason
2017-04-11 15:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-04-11 16:26 ` Mason
2017-04-11 16:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-04-11 17:52 ` Mason
2017-04-12 8:08 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-04-12 9:50 ` Mason
2017-04-12 9:59 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-04-19 11:19 ` Mason
2017-04-20 8:20 ` Mason [this message]
2017-04-20 9:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-03-29 11:39 ` Mason
2017-03-30 11:09 ` Mason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2003d851-e17e-1a43-3889-ec6e79e635e3@free.fr \
--to=slash.tmp@free.fr \
--cc=david.laight@aculab.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thibaud_cornic@sigmadesigns.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).