From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>,
travis@sgi.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/10] x86: Unify percpu.h
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 14:48:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080110134835.GE5886@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0801091210300.11709@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
* Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Dave Hansen wrote:
>
> > Then I really think this particular patch belongs in that other
> > patch set. Here, it makes very little sense, and it's on the end
> > anyway.
>
> It makes sense in that both percpu_32/64 are very small as a result of
> earlier patches and so its justifiable to put them together to
> simplify the next patchset.
i'd agree with this - lets just keep the existing flow of patches
intact. It's not like the percpu code is in any danger of becoming
unclean or quirky - it's one of the best-maintained pieces of kernel
code :)
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-10 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-08 21:10 [PATCH 00/10] percpu: Per cpu code simplification V4 travis
2008-01-08 21:10 ` [PATCH 01/10] percpu: Use a kconfig variable to signal arch specific percpu setup travis
2008-01-08 21:10 ` [PATCH 02/10] percpu: Move arch XX_PER_CPU_XX definitions into linux/percpu.h travis
2008-01-08 21:10 ` [PATCH 03/10] percpu: Make the asm-generic/percpu.h more "generic" travis
2008-01-08 21:10 ` [PATCH 04/10] x86_32: Use generic percpu.h travis
2008-01-08 21:10 ` [PATCH 05/10] x86_64: Use generic percpu travis
2008-01-08 21:10 ` [PATCH 06/10] s390: " travis
2008-01-08 21:10 ` [PATCH 07/10] Powerpc: Use generic per cpu travis
2008-01-08 21:10 ` [PATCH 08/10] Sparc64: Use generic percpu travis
2008-01-08 21:10 ` [PATCH 09/10] ia64: " travis
2008-01-08 21:10 ` [PATCH 10/10] x86: Unify percpu.h travis
2008-01-09 19:28 ` Dave Hansen
2008-01-09 19:31 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-09 19:53 ` Dave Hansen
2008-01-09 20:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-01-10 13:48 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-01-08 2:11 [PATCH 00/10] percpu: Per cpu code simplification V3 travis
2008-01-08 2:11 ` [PATCH 10/10] x86: Unify percpu.h travis
2007-12-28 0:16 [PATCH 00/10] percpu: Per cpu code simplification V2 travis
2007-12-28 0:16 ` [PATCH 10/10] x86: Unify percpu.h travis
2007-11-28 21:09 [patch 00/10] Per cpu code simplification V2 Christoph Lameter
2007-11-28 21:09 ` [patch 10/10] x86: Unify percpu.h Christoph Lameter
2007-11-30 11:14 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080110134835.GE5886@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=steiner@sgi.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=travis@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).