From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
tomaz.solc@tablix.org, aaron.lu@intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] libata, freezer: avoid block device removal while system is frozen
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 06:08:07 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131218110807.GA3808@htj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3253153.CIRSLE6KOu@vostro.rjw.lan>
Hey, Rafael.
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 02:04:35AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > + * The core suspend/resume path is fundamentally broken due to
> > + * freezable kthreads and workqueue and may deadlock if a block
> > + * device gets removed while resume is in progress. I don't know
> > + * what the solution is short of removing freezable kthreads and
> > + * workqueues altogether.
>
> Do you mean the block device core or the SCSI core or something else? It would
> be good to clarify that here to avoid confusion.
Will clarify.
> > + * The following is an ugly hack to avoid kicking off device
> > + * removal while freezer is active. This is a joke but does avoid
> > + * this particular deadlock scenario.
> > + *
> > + * https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62801
> > + * http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=138695698516487
> > + */
> > + while (pm_freezing)
> > + msleep(100);
>
> Why is the sleep time 100 ms exactly? And why does it matter?
Just a number I pulled out of my ass.
> For example, what would change if it were 10 ms?
Yeah, 10ms is my favorite human-visible polling duration too (because
it's slow enough not to cause overhead issues while fast enough to be
mostly unnoticeable to humans). This one doesn't really matter
because the operation's latency isn't something which the user would
wait for actively. That said, yeah, why not, I'll change it to 10ms.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-18 11:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-13 17:49 Writeback threads and freezable Tejun Heo
2013-12-13 18:52 ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-13 20:40 ` [PATCH] libata, freezer: avoid block device removal while system is frozen Tejun Heo
2013-12-13 22:45 ` Nigel Cunningham
2013-12-13 23:07 ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-13 23:15 ` Nigel Cunningham
2013-12-14 1:55 ` Dave Chinner
2013-12-14 20:31 ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-14 20:36 ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-14 21:21 ` Nigel Cunningham
2013-12-17 2:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-12-17 2:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-12-17 12:34 ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-18 0:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-12-18 11:17 ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-18 21:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-12-18 21:39 ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-18 21:41 ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-18 22:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-12-19 23:35 ` [PATCH wq/for-3.14 1/2] workqueue: update max_active clamping rules Tejun Heo
2013-12-20 1:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-12-19 23:37 ` [PATCH wq/for-3.14 2/2] workqueue: implement @drain for workqueue_set_max_active() Tejun Heo
2013-12-20 1:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-12-20 13:32 ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-20 13:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-12-20 14:23 ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-16 12:12 ` [PATCH] libata, freezer: avoid block device removal while system is frozen Ming Lei
2013-12-16 12:45 ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-16 13:24 ` Ming Lei
2013-12-16 16:05 ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-17 2:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-12-17 12:36 ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-18 0:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-12-17 12:50 ` [PATCH v2] " Tejun Heo
2013-12-18 1:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-12-18 11:08 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2013-12-18 12:07 ` [PATCH v3] " Tejun Heo
2013-12-18 22:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-12-19 17:24 ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-19 18:54 ` [PATCH v4] " Tejun Heo
2013-12-14 1:53 ` Writeback threads and freezable Dave Chinner
2013-12-14 17:30 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-12-14 20:23 ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-16 3:56 ` Dave Chinner
2013-12-16 12:51 ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-16 12:56 ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-18 0:35 ` Dave Chinner
2013-12-18 11:43 ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-18 22:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-12-19 4:08 ` Dave Chinner
2013-12-19 16:24 ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-20 0:51 ` Dave Chinner
2013-12-20 14:51 ` Tejun Heo
2013-12-20 14:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131218110807.GA3808@htj.dyndns.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tomaz.solc@tablix.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).