linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Ganesh Mahendran <opensource.ganesh@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	rrichter@cavium.com, tchalamarla@cavium.com,
	Shanker Donthineni <shankerd@codeaurora.org>,
	apinski@cavium.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "arm64: Increase the max granular size"
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 14:18:02 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160316141802.GC13423@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56E95A4E.4050709@codeaurora.org>

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 08:06:22AM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Will Deacon wrote:
> >You could look into making ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN a runtime value, but that
> >looks like an uphill struggle to me. Alternatively, we could only warn
> >if the CWG is bigger than L1_CACHE_BYTES *and* we have a non-coherent
> >DMA master, but that doesn't solve any performance issues from having
> >things like locks sharing cachelines, not that I think we ever got any
> >data on that (afaik, we don't pad locks to cacheline boundaries anyway).
> >I'm also not sure what it would mean for PCI NoSnoop transactions.
> 
> Our internal version of this patch made it a Kconfig option.  Perhaps that
> would at least be an improvement over just reverting it?  We already have to
> have our own defconfig for the QDF2432.

Why do you need your own defconfig? If it's just on the short term until
all your code is upstream, that's fine, but this goes against the single
Image aim. I would like defconfig to cover all supported SoCs (and yes,
ACPI on by default once we deem it !EXPERT anymore), though at some
point we may need a server/mobile split (if the generated image is too
large, maybe more stuff being built as modules).

-- 
Catalin

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-03-16 14:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-16  9:32 [PATCH] Revert "arm64: Increase the max granular size" Ganesh Mahendran
2016-03-16 10:07 ` Will Deacon
2016-03-16 13:06   ` Timur Tabi
2016-03-16 14:03     ` Mark Rutland
2016-03-16 14:35       ` Will Deacon
2016-03-16 14:54         ` Mark Rutland
2016-03-16 14:18     ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2016-03-16 15:26       ` Timur Tabi
2016-03-17 14:27         ` Catalin Marinas
2016-03-17 14:49           ` Timur Tabi
2016-03-17 15:37             ` Catalin Marinas
2016-03-17 16:03               ` Marc Zyngier
2016-03-17 18:07           ` Andrew Pinski
2016-03-17 18:34             ` Timur Tabi
2016-03-17 18:37             ` Catalin Marinas
2016-03-18 21:05 ` Chalamarla, Tirumalesh
2016-03-21  1:56   ` Ganesh Mahendran
2016-03-21 17:14   ` Catalin Marinas
2016-03-21 17:23     ` Will Deacon
2016-03-21 17:33       ` Catalin Marinas
2016-03-21 17:39         ` Chalamarla, Tirumalesh
     [not found]     ` <CAPub14-sFgx=oCHzJPb9h9b_V0rbn5UAMDNJ-yTkjhz38JPqMQ@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]       ` <10fef112-37f1-0a1b-b5af-435acd032f01@codeaurora.org>
2017-04-06  7:22         ` Imran Khan
2017-04-06 15:58           ` Catalin Marinas
2017-04-07  2:06             ` Ganesh Mahendran
2017-04-07  8:59               ` Catalin Marinas
2017-04-12  5:13               ` Imran Khan
2017-04-12 14:00                 ` Chalamarla, Tirumalesh
2017-04-17  7:35                   ` Imran Khan
2017-04-17 10:38                     ` Sunil Kovvuri
2017-04-18 14:48                       ` Catalin Marinas
2017-04-18 17:05                         ` Sunil Kovvuri
2017-04-19 12:01                           ` Catalin Marinas
2017-04-19 13:11                             ` Sunil Kovvuri
2017-04-25  6:42                               ` Ding Tianhong
2017-04-18 18:21                     ` Chalamarla, Tirumalesh
2017-04-11  4:40             ` Jon Masters

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160316141802.GC13423@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=apinski@cavium.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=opensource.ganesh@gmail.com \
    --cc=rrichter@cavium.com \
    --cc=shankerd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tchalamarla@cavium.com \
    --cc=timur@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).