Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Patches to allow consistent mmc / mmcblk numbering w/ device tree - Russell King

From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>,
	Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>,
	"linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
	Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>,
	"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..."
	<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
	devicetree-spec@vger.kernel.org,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Venu Byravarasu <vbyravarasu@nvidia.com>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
	Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
	Grant Grundler <grundler@chromium.org>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
	"Luca Porzio (lporzio)" <lporzio@micron.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Chaotian Jing <chaotian.jing@mediatek.com>,
	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	zhonghui.fu@linux.intel.com, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Patches to allow consistent mmc / mmcblk numbering w/ device tree
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 22:50:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160429215017.GC19428@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD=FV=V9V8P=d59RX1eaAdVxJgMxub1F6hzQNw1QW+7t=3POBw@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 02:39:35PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
[didn't read most of your reply]

> Really I just reposted it several times because I notice that you seem
> to ignore many points of my emails.  I was really hoping to get you to
> address this point.  I notice that you still didn't.  Either you are
> just trying to annoy me, or you don't have an answer to how my patch
> series hurts you.

I don't see you treating Rob with the same contempt that you have
treated me in this thread, despite Rob and myself both telling you
basically the same thing.

Maybe you should try some of the solutions we're suggesting, rather
than hammering away at your keyboard because you disagree with the
feedback that you're getting, to see whether these other solutions
resolve it.

I notice that your replies focuses solely on UUIDs to my messages,
despite *my* messages also talking about labels.  Therefore, I think
you are _not_ actually reading my replies - if you were, then you
would have noticed that I've been making the same suggestion as Rob.

Also, the speed at which you hammer out your replies (in as little
as minutes) suggests that you aren't reading them.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.