From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] mm: deactivations shouldn't bias the LRU balance
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 14:57:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160608125727.GI22570@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160606194836.3624-9-hannes@cmpxchg.org>
On Mon 06-06-16 15:48:34, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Operations like MADV_FREE, FADV_DONTNEED etc. currently move any
> affected active pages to the inactive list to accelerate their reclaim
> (good) but also steer page reclaim toward that LRU type, or away from
> the other (bad).
>
> The reason why this is undesirable is that such operations are not
> part of the regular page aging cycle, and rather a fluke that doesn't
> say much about the remaining pages on that list. They might all be in
> heavy use. But once the chunk of easy victims has been purged, the VM
> continues to apply elevated pressure on the remaining hot pages. The
> other LRU, meanwhile, might have easily reclaimable pages, and there
> was never a need to steer away from it in the first place.
>
> As the previous patch outlined, we should focus on recording actually
> observed cost to steer the balance rather than speculating about the
> potential value of one LRU list over the other. In that spirit, leave
> explicitely deactivated pages to the LRU algorithm to pick up, and let
> rotations decide which list is the easiest to reclaim.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> ---
> mm/swap.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c
> index 645d21242324..ae07b469ddca 100644
> --- a/mm/swap.c
> +++ b/mm/swap.c
> @@ -538,7 +538,6 @@ static void lru_deactivate_file_fn(struct page *page, struct lruvec *lruvec,
>
> if (active)
> __count_vm_event(PGDEACTIVATE);
> - lru_note_cost(lruvec, !file, hpage_nr_pages(page));
> }
>
>
> @@ -546,7 +545,6 @@ static void lru_deactivate_fn(struct page *page, struct lruvec *lruvec,
> void *arg)
> {
> if (PageLRU(page) && PageActive(page) && !PageUnevictable(page)) {
> - int file = page_is_file_cache(page);
> int lru = page_lru_base_type(page);
>
> del_page_from_lru_list(page, lruvec, lru + LRU_ACTIVE);
> @@ -555,7 +553,6 @@ static void lru_deactivate_fn(struct page *page, struct lruvec *lruvec,
> add_page_to_lru_list(page, lruvec, lru);
>
> __count_vm_event(PGDEACTIVATE);
> - lru_note_cost(lruvec, !file, hpage_nr_pages(page));
> }
> }
>
> --
> 2.8.3
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-08 12:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-06 19:48 [PATCH 00/10] mm: balance LRU lists based on relative thrashing Johannes Weiner
2016-06-06 19:48 ` [PATCH 01/10] mm: allow swappiness that prefers anon over file Johannes Weiner
2016-06-07 0:25 ` Minchan Kim
2016-06-07 14:18 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-06-08 0:06 ` Minchan Kim
2016-06-08 15:58 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-06-09 1:01 ` Minchan Kim
2016-06-09 13:32 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-06-06 19:48 ` [PATCH 02/10] mm: swap: unexport __pagevec_lru_add() Johannes Weiner
2016-06-06 21:32 ` Rik van Riel
2016-06-07 9:07 ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-08 7:14 ` Minchan Kim
2016-06-06 19:48 ` [PATCH 03/10] mm: fold and remove lru_cache_add_anon() and lru_cache_add_file() Johannes Weiner
2016-06-06 21:33 ` Rik van Riel
2016-06-07 9:12 ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-08 7:24 ` Minchan Kim
2016-06-06 19:48 ` [PATCH 04/10] mm: fix LRU balancing effect of new transparent huge pages Johannes Weiner
2016-06-06 21:36 ` Rik van Riel
2016-06-07 9:19 ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-08 7:28 ` Minchan Kim
2016-06-06 19:48 ` [PATCH 05/10] mm: remove LRU balancing effect of temporary page isolation Johannes Weiner
2016-06-06 21:56 ` Rik van Riel
2016-06-06 22:15 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-06-07 1:11 ` Rik van Riel
2016-06-07 13:57 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-06-07 9:26 ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-07 14:06 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-06-07 9:49 ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-08 7:39 ` Minchan Kim
2016-06-08 16:02 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-06-06 19:48 ` [PATCH 06/10] mm: remove unnecessary use-once cache bias from LRU balancing Johannes Weiner
2016-06-07 2:20 ` Rik van Riel
2016-06-07 14:11 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-06-08 8:03 ` Minchan Kim
2016-06-08 12:31 ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-06 19:48 ` [PATCH 07/10] mm: base LRU balancing on an explicit cost model Johannes Weiner
2016-06-06 19:13 ` kbuild test robot
2016-06-07 2:34 ` Rik van Riel
2016-06-07 14:12 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-06-08 8:14 ` Minchan Kim
2016-06-08 16:06 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-06-08 12:51 ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-08 16:16 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-06-09 12:18 ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-09 13:33 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-06-06 19:48 ` [PATCH 08/10] mm: deactivations shouldn't bias the LRU balance Johannes Weiner
2016-06-08 8:15 ` Minchan Kim
2016-06-08 12:57 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2016-06-06 19:48 ` [PATCH 09/10] mm: only count actual rotations as LRU reclaim cost Johannes Weiner
2016-06-08 8:19 ` Minchan Kim
2016-06-08 13:18 ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-06 19:48 ` [PATCH 10/10] mm: balance LRU lists based on relative thrashing Johannes Weiner
2016-06-06 19:22 ` kbuild test robot
2016-06-06 23:50 ` Tim Chen
2016-06-07 16:23 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-06-07 19:56 ` Tim Chen
2016-06-08 13:58 ` Michal Hocko
2016-06-10 2:19 ` Minchan Kim
2016-06-13 15:52 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-06-15 2:23 ` Minchan Kim
2016-06-16 15:12 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-06-17 7:49 ` Minchan Kim
2016-06-17 17:01 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-06-20 7:42 ` Minchan Kim
2016-06-22 21:56 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-06-24 6:22 ` Minchan Kim
2016-06-07 9:51 ` [PATCH 00/10] " Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160608125727.GI22570@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).