linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	tglx@linutronix.de, axboe@fb.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/13] pci: Provide sensible irq vector alloc/free routines
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2016 05:47:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160710034737.GB15720@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160706080545.GA14583@dhcp-27-118.brq.redhat.com>

On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 10:05:45AM +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> > + pci_enable_msi, pci_enable_msi_range, pci_enable_msi_exact, pci_disable_msi,
> > + pci_msi_vec_count, pci_enable_msix_range, pci_enable_msix_exact,
> > + pci_disable_msix, pci_msix_vec_count
> 
> Description of these functions can be removed when all drivers migrated
> to the new API. Also implementation descriptions + examples would still
> be needed AFAICT.

I diagreed - if we deprecated functions the only thing that should
be mentioned is a "don't use these". 

> This function's code almost matches the existing pci_enable_msix_range()
> so pci_enable_msix_range() should be reworked instead IMHO.

That's what earlier versions of the code did.  However due to the
fact that we want to avoid over-allocating the msix_vectors array
(minor) and get the vectors count of the affinity mask right (major,
as pointed out by you last time) I had to move the allocations inside
the helpers that loop around the atctual enablement.  I didn't want
to change the function to a different version of the algorithm just
before removing them relatively soon.  But given that strong preference
for changing these simple functions instead of duplicating them I've
changed that patch to do that now.

> We do not need to keep msix_entry array, since it only needed for
> pci_irq_vector() function. But the same info could be retrieved from
> msi_desc::irq.

Indeed.  Avoiding this allocation makes these interfaces quite a bit
simpler.  It requires a few prep patches, but I think it's definitively
worth, so the next version will avoid the need for the msix_entry array.

> > +	/* use legacy irq if allowed */
> > +	if (min_vecs == 1)
> > +		return 1;
> > +	return -ENOSPC;
> 
> The original error code (in vecs) would be overridden with -ENOSPC here.

Ok, fixed.

> > +	WARN_ON_ONCE(!dev->msi_enabled && nr > 0);
> > +	return dev->irq + nr;
> 
> I think this function should check irq number existence and return the
> vector number or -EINVAL;

Ok, fixed.

> > +		unsigned int flags)
> > +{
> > +	if (min_vecs > 1)
> > +		return -ENOSPC;
> 
> In case CONFIG_PCI_MSI is unset min_vecs > 1 is -EINVAL;

Ok, fixed.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-10  3:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-04  8:39 automatic interrupt affinity for MSI/MSI-X capable devices V3 Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-04  8:39 ` [PATCH 01/13] irq/msi: Remove unused MSI_FLAG_IDENTITY_MAP Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-04 10:32   ` [tip:irq/core] genirq/msi: " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2016-07-04  8:39 ` [PATCH 02/13] irq: Introduce IRQD_AFFINITY_MANAGED flag Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-04 10:32   ` [tip:irq/core] genirq: " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2016-07-04  8:39 ` [PATCH 03/13] irq: Add affinity hint to irq allocation Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-04 10:33   ` [tip:irq/core] genirq: " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2016-07-04  8:39 ` [PATCH 04/13] irq: Use affinity hint in irqdesc allocation Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-04 10:33   ` [tip:irq/core] genirq: " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2016-07-04  8:39 ` [PATCH 05/13] irq/msi: Make use of affinity aware allocations Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-04 10:33   ` [tip:irq/core] genirq/msi: " tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2016-07-04  8:39 ` [PATCH 06/13] irq: add a helper spread an affinity mask for MSI/MSI-X vectors Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-04 10:34   ` [tip:irq/core] genirq: Add a helper to " tip-bot for Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-04  8:39 ` [PATCH 07/13] pci: Provide sensible irq vector alloc/free routines Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-06  8:05   ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-07-10  3:47     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2016-07-11 10:43       ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-07-12  9:13         ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-12 12:46           ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-07-04  8:39 ` [PATCH 08/13] pci: spread interrupt vectors in pci_alloc_irq_vectors Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-07 11:05   ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-07-10  3:57     ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-12  6:49       ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-07-04  8:39 ` [PATCH 09/13] blk-mq: don't redistribute hardware queues on a CPU hotplug event Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-04  8:39 ` [PATCH 10/13] blk-mq: only allocate a single mq_map per tag_set Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-04  8:39 ` [PATCH 11/13] blk-mq: allow the driver to pass in an affinity mask Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-04  8:39 ` [PATCH 12/13] nvme: switch to use pci_alloc_irq_vectors Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-07 19:30   ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-07-10  3:59     ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-04  8:39 ` [PATCH 13/13] nvme: remove the post_scan callout Christoph Hellwig
2016-07-04 10:30 ` automatic interrupt affinity for MSI/MSI-X capable devices V3 Thomas Gleixner
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-06-14 19:58 automatic interrupt affinity for MSI/MSI-X capable devices V2 Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-14 19:59 ` [PATCH 07/13] pci: Provide sensible irq vector alloc/free routines Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-23 11:16   ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-06-30 16:54     ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-30 17:28       ` Alexander Gordeev
2016-06-30 17:35         ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160710034737.GB15720@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=agordeev@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).