From: "José Bollo" <jobol@nonadev.net>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: jmorris@namei.org, keescook@chromium.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, casey@schaufler-ca.com,
hch@infradead.org, igor.stoppa@huawei.com,
james.l.morris@oracle.com, paul@paul-moore.com,
sds@tycho.nsa.gov
Subject: Re: [PATCH] LSM: Convert security_hook_heads into explicit array of struct list_head
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 11:44:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170531114417.5a7d8bcb@d-jobol.iot.bzh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201705302329.IEB05735.FLJOFHSQVtOOFM@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
On Tue, 30 May 2017 23:29:10 +0900
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> wrote:
> James Morris wrote:
> > On Sun, 28 May 2017, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> >
> > > can afford enabling". And we know that we cannot merge all
> > > security modules into mainline. Thus, allowing LKM-based LSM
> > > modules is inevitable.
> >
> > Nope, it's not inevitable. The LSM API only caters to in-tree
> > users.
> >
> > I'm not sure why you persist against this.
>
> Then, we are willing to accept LSM modules with users less than 10,
> aren't we? Forcing users to patch and recompile is as heartless as
> forcing CONFIG_MODULES=n.
These are good reasons. I'm in favor of Tetsuo.
Regards
José
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-31 9:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-27 11:17 [PATCH] LSM: Convert security_hook_heads into explicit array of struct list_head Tetsuo Handa
2017-05-27 22:30 ` Casey Schaufler
2017-05-28 0:38 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-05-28 1:04 ` Kees Cook
2017-05-28 1:26 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-05-28 17:57 ` Casey Schaufler
2017-05-30 10:22 ` James Morris
2017-05-30 14:29 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-05-30 15:25 ` Alan Cox
2017-05-30 23:06 ` James Morris
2017-05-31 10:41 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-05-31 11:04 ` James Morris
2017-05-31 11:31 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-05-31 14:43 ` Alan Cox
2017-05-31 15:10 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-05-31 15:14 ` Alan Cox
2017-05-31 9:44 ` José Bollo [this message]
2017-05-28 20:29 ` [PATCH v2] " Tetsuo Handa
2017-05-28 21:19 ` Kees Cook
2017-05-29 17:32 ` Casey Schaufler
2017-05-30 10:32 ` James Morris
2017-05-31 20:49 ` Igor Stoppa
2017-05-31 22:56 ` James Morris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170531114417.5a7d8bcb@d-jobol.iot.bzh \
--to=jobol@nonadev.net \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=igor.stoppa@huawei.com \
--cc=james.l.morris@oracle.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).