linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	live-patching@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 10/10] x86/unwind: add undwarf unwinder
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 14:13:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170601121356.5yoeq74el77sewoo@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <89552d4047e5aed843f7b6a54277f9af62da6a82.1496293620.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com>

On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 12:44:16AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:

> +static struct undwarf *undwarf_lookup(unsigned long ip)
> +{
> +	struct undwarf *undwarf;
> +	struct module *mod;
> +
> +	/* Look in vmlinux undwarf section: */
> +	undwarf = __undwarf_lookup(__undwarf_start, __undwarf_end - __undwarf_start, ip);
> +	if (undwarf)
> +		return undwarf;
> +
> +	/* Look in module undwarf sections: */
> +	preempt_disable();
> +	mod = __module_address(ip);
> +	if (!mod || !mod->arch.undwarf)
> +		goto module_out;
> +	undwarf = __undwarf_lookup(mod->arch.undwarf, mod->arch.num_undwarves, ip);
> +
> +module_out:
> +	preempt_enable();
> +	return undwarf;
> +}

> +bool unwind_next_frame(struct unwind_state *state)
> +{
> +	struct undwarf *undwarf;
> +	unsigned long cfa;
> +	bool indirect = false;
> +	enum stack_type prev_type = state->stack_info.type;
> +	unsigned long ip_p, prev_sp = state->sp;
> +
> +	if (unwind_done(state))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	/* Have we reached the end? */
> +	if (state->regs && user_mode(state->regs))
> +		goto done;
> +
> +	/* Look up the instruction address in the .undwarf table: */
> +	undwarf = undwarf_lookup(state->ip);
> +	if (!undwarf || undwarf->cfa_reg == UNDWARF_REG_UNDEFINED)
> +		goto done;
> +

	....

> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(unwind_next_frame);
> +
> +void __unwind_start(struct unwind_state *state, struct task_struct *task,
> +		    struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long *first_frame)
> +{

	...

> +	while (!unwind_done(state) &&
> +	       (!on_stack(&state->stack_info, first_frame, sizeof(long)) ||
> +			state->sp <= (unsigned long)first_frame))
> +		unwind_next_frame(state);
> +}

So we do that lookup for every single frame. That's going to hurt.

Would it make sense to cache the last 'module' in an attempt to at least
avoid that lookup again? Something like so:

---
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/unwind.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/unwind.h
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ struct unwind_state {
 #if defined(CONFIG_UNDWARF_UNWINDER)
 	unsigned long sp, bp, ip;
 	struct pt_regs *regs;
+	struct module *mod;
 #elif defined(CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER)
 	bool got_irq;
 	unsigned long *bp, *orig_sp, ip;
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_undwarf.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/unwind_undwarf.c
@@ -62,26 +62,45 @@ static struct undwarf *__undwarf_lookup(
 	return NULL;
 }
 
-static struct undwarf *undwarf_lookup(unsigned long ip)
+static struct undwarf *undwarf_lookup(struct unwind_state *state)
 {
+	struct module *mod = state->mod;
+	unsigned long ip = state->ip;
 	struct undwarf *undwarf;
-	struct module *mod;
+	unsigned int num;
 
-	/* Look in vmlinux undwarf section: */
-	undwarf = __undwarf_lookup(__undwarf_start, __undwarf_end - __undwarf_start, ip);
-	if (undwarf)
-		return undwarf;
+	if (mod) {
+		if (within_module(ip, mod)) {
+			undwarf = mod->arch.undwarf;
+			num	= mod->arch.num_undwarves;
+			goto lookup;
+		}
+		mod = NULL;
+	}
+
+	if (core_kernel_text(ip)) {
+		undwarf = __undwarf_start;
+		num	= __undwarf_end - __undwarf_start;
+		goto lookup;
+	}
 
-	/* Look in module undwarf sections: */
+	/*
+	 * Shut up the warning from __module_address(), regardless the undwarf
+	 * pointer can disappear from under us.
+	 */
 	preempt_disable();
 	mod = __module_address(ip);
+	preempt_enable();
+
 	if (!mod || !mod->arch.undwarf)
-		goto module_out;
-	undwarf = __undwarf_lookup(mod->arch.undwarf, mod->arch.num_undwarves, ip);
+		return NULL;
 
-module_out:
-	preempt_enable();
-	return undwarf;
+	undwarf	= mod->arch.undwarf;
+	num	= mod->arch.num_undwarves;
+
+lookup:
+	state->mod = mod;
+	return __undwarf_lookup(undwarf, num, ip);
 }
 
 static bool stack_access_ok(struct unwind_state *state, unsigned long addr,
@@ -168,7 +187,7 @@ bool unwind_next_frame(struct unwind_sta
 		goto done;
 
 	/* Look up the instruction address in the .undwarf table: */
-	undwarf = undwarf_lookup(state->ip);
+	undwarf = undwarf_lookup(state);
 	if (!undwarf || undwarf->cfa_reg == UNDWARF_REG_UNDEFINED)
 		goto done;
 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-06-01 12:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-01  5:44 [RFC PATCH 00/10] x86: undwarf unwinder Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-01  5:44 ` [RFC PATCH 01/10] objtool: move checking code to check.c Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-14  7:22   ` Jiri Slaby
2017-06-01  5:44 ` [RFC PATCH 02/10] objtool, x86: add several functions and files to the objtool whitelist Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-14  7:24   ` Jiri Slaby
2017-06-14 13:03     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-01  5:44 ` [RFC PATCH 03/10] objtool: stack validation 2.0 Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-01  5:44 ` [RFC PATCH 04/10] objtool: add undwarf debuginfo generation Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-14  8:42   ` Jiri Slaby
2017-06-14 13:27     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-22  7:47       ` Jiri Slaby
2017-06-22 12:49         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-01  5:44 ` [RFC PATCH 05/10] objtool, x86: add facility for asm code to provide CFI hints Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-01 13:57   ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-06-01 14:16     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-01 14:40       ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-06-01 15:02         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-01  5:44 ` [RFC PATCH 06/10] x86/entry: add CFI hint undwarf annotations Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-01 14:03   ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-06-01 14:23     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-01 14:28       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-01 14:39         ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-06-01 15:01           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-01  5:44 ` [RFC PATCH 07/10] x86/asm: add CFI hint annotations to sync_core() Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-01  5:44 ` [RFC PATCH 08/10] extable: rename 'sortextable' script to 'sorttable' Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-01  5:44 ` [RFC PATCH 09/10] extable: add undwarf table sorting ability to sorttable script Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-01  5:44 ` [RFC PATCH 10/10] x86/unwind: add undwarf unwinder Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-01 11:05   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-06-01 12:26     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-01 12:47       ` Jiri Slaby
2017-06-01 13:02         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-01 13:42         ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-06-01 13:10       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-06-01 12:13   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2017-06-01 12:36     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-01 13:12       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-06-01 15:03         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-14 11:45   ` Jiri Slaby
2017-06-14 13:44     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-01  6:08 ` [RFC PATCH 00/10] x86: " Ingo Molnar
2017-06-01 11:58   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-01 12:17     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-06-01 12:33       ` Jiri Slaby
2017-06-01 12:52         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-01 12:57           ` Jiri Slaby
2017-06-01 12:47       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-01 13:25         ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-06-06 14:14           ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-06-01 13:50         ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-06-01 13:50     ` Ingo Molnar
2017-06-01 13:58       ` Jiri Slaby
2017-06-02  8:30         ` Jiri Slaby
2017-06-01 14:05       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-01 14:08       ` Jiri Slaby
2017-06-02 10:40         ` Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170601121356.5yoeq74el77sewoo@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).