From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
live-patching@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 06/10] x86/entry: add CFI hint undwarf annotations
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 09:28:58 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170601142858.na6iph4ihpgcgold@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170601142358.wvasu35pvyyvjt2r@treble>
On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 09:23:58AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 07:03:18AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 10:44 PM, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Just to make sure I understand this, if we unwind from...
> >
> > > @@ -112,6 +114,7 @@ For 32-bit we have the following conventions - kernel is built with
> > > movq %rdx, 12*8+\offset(%rsp)
> > > movq %rsi, 13*8+\offset(%rsp)
> >
> > ...here..., will objtool think that rdx and rsi (etc) still live in
> > their respective regs, or will it find them in the on-stack data given
> > by CFI_REGS? If the former, how does undwarf deal with the
> > corresponding pops?
>
> It will find them in their respective registers, which is fine because
> they haven't been clobbered yet.
Sorry, I hit send too soon. Which pops are you referring to?
--
Josh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-01 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-01 5:44 [RFC PATCH 00/10] x86: undwarf unwinder Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-01 5:44 ` [RFC PATCH 01/10] objtool: move checking code to check.c Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-14 7:22 ` Jiri Slaby
2017-06-01 5:44 ` [RFC PATCH 02/10] objtool, x86: add several functions and files to the objtool whitelist Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-14 7:24 ` Jiri Slaby
2017-06-14 13:03 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-01 5:44 ` [RFC PATCH 03/10] objtool: stack validation 2.0 Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-01 5:44 ` [RFC PATCH 04/10] objtool: add undwarf debuginfo generation Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-14 8:42 ` Jiri Slaby
2017-06-14 13:27 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-22 7:47 ` Jiri Slaby
2017-06-22 12:49 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-01 5:44 ` [RFC PATCH 05/10] objtool, x86: add facility for asm code to provide CFI hints Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-01 13:57 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-06-01 14:16 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-01 14:40 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-06-01 15:02 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-01 5:44 ` [RFC PATCH 06/10] x86/entry: add CFI hint undwarf annotations Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-01 14:03 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-06-01 14:23 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-01 14:28 ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2017-06-01 14:39 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-06-01 15:01 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-01 5:44 ` [RFC PATCH 07/10] x86/asm: add CFI hint annotations to sync_core() Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-01 5:44 ` [RFC PATCH 08/10] extable: rename 'sortextable' script to 'sorttable' Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-01 5:44 ` [RFC PATCH 09/10] extable: add undwarf table sorting ability to sorttable script Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-01 5:44 ` [RFC PATCH 10/10] x86/unwind: add undwarf unwinder Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-01 11:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-06-01 12:26 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-01 12:47 ` Jiri Slaby
2017-06-01 13:02 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-01 13:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-06-01 13:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-06-01 12:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-06-01 12:36 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-01 13:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-06-01 15:03 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-14 11:45 ` Jiri Slaby
2017-06-14 13:44 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-01 6:08 ` [RFC PATCH 00/10] x86: " Ingo Molnar
2017-06-01 11:58 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-01 12:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-06-01 12:33 ` Jiri Slaby
2017-06-01 12:52 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-01 12:57 ` Jiri Slaby
2017-06-01 12:47 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-01 13:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-06-06 14:14 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-06-01 13:50 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-06-01 13:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-06-01 13:58 ` Jiri Slaby
2017-06-02 8:30 ` Jiri Slaby
2017-06-01 14:05 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-06-01 14:08 ` Jiri Slaby
2017-06-02 10:40 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170601142858.na6iph4ihpgcgold@treble \
--to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).