From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
ying.huang@intel.com, Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
s.priebe@profihost.ag, mgorman@techsingularity.net,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
alex.williamson@redhat.com, lkp@01.org, kirill@shutemov.name,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
zi.yan@cs.rutgers.edu, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [mm] ac5b2c1891: vm-scalability.throughput -61.3% regression
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 22:25:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181203212539.GR31738@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1812031237340.192288@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
On Mon 03-12-18 12:39:34, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Dec 2018, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> > I have merely said that a better THP locality needs more work and during
> > the review discussion I have even volunteered to work on that. There
> > are other reclaim related fixes under work right now. All I am saying
> > is that MADV_TRANSHUGE having numa locality implications cannot satisfy
> > all the usecases and it is particurarly KVM that suffers from it.
>
> I think extending functionality so thp can be allocated remotely if truly
> desired is worthwhile
This is a complete NUMA policy antipatern that we have for all other
user memory allocations. So far you have to be explicit for your numa
requirements. You are trying to conflate NUMA api with MADV and that is
just conflating two orthogonal things and that is just wrong.
Let's put the __GFP_THISNODE issue aside. I do not remember you
confirming that __GFP_COMPACT_ONLY patch is OK for you (sorry it might
got lost in the emails storm from back then) but if that is the only
agreeable solution for now then I can live with that. __GFP_NORETRY hack
was shown to not work properly by Mel AFAIR. Again if I misremember then
I am sorry and I can live with that. But conflating MADV_TRANSHUGE with
an implicit numa placement policy and/or adding an opt-in for remote
NUMA placing is completely backwards and a broken API which will likely
bites us later. I sincerely hope we are not going to repeat mistakes
from the past.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-03 21:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-27 6:25 [LKP] [mm] ac5b2c1891: vm-scalability.throughput -61.3% regression kernel test robot
2018-11-27 17:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-11-27 18:17 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-27 18:21 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-27 19:05 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-11-27 19:16 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-11-27 20:57 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-11-27 22:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-11-28 6:30 ` Michal Hocko
2018-11-28 3:20 ` Huang, Ying
2018-11-28 16:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-11-28 18:39 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-11-28 23:10 ` David Rientjes
2018-12-03 18:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-12-03 18:14 ` Michal Hocko
2018-12-03 18:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-12-03 18:30 ` Michal Hocko
2018-12-03 18:45 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-12-03 18:59 ` Michal Hocko
2018-12-03 19:23 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-12-03 20:26 ` David Rientjes
2018-12-03 19:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-12-03 20:12 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-12-03 20:36 ` David Rientjes
2018-12-03 22:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-12-03 22:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-12-03 22:57 ` David Rientjes
2018-12-04 9:22 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-12-04 10:45 ` Mel Gorman
2018-12-05 0:47 ` David Rientjes
2018-12-05 9:08 ` Michal Hocko
2018-12-05 10:43 ` Mel Gorman
2018-12-05 11:43 ` Michal Hocko
2018-12-05 10:06 ` Mel Gorman
2018-12-05 20:40 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-12-05 21:59 ` David Rientjes
2018-12-06 0:00 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-12-05 22:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-12-05 22:12 ` David Rientjes
2018-12-05 23:36 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-12-05 23:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-12-06 0:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-12-06 9:14 ` MADV_HUGEPAGE vs. NUMA semantic (was: Re: [LKP] [mm] ac5b2c1891: vm-scalability.throughput -61.3% regression) Michal Hocko
2018-12-06 23:49 ` David Rientjes
2018-12-07 7:34 ` Michal Hocko
2018-12-07 4:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-12-07 7:49 ` Michal Hocko
2018-12-07 9:06 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-12-07 23:15 ` David Rientjes
2018-12-06 23:43 ` [LKP] [mm] ac5b2c1891: vm-scalability.throughput -61.3% regression David Rientjes
2018-12-07 4:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-12-10 0:29 ` David Rientjes
2018-12-10 4:49 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-12-12 0:37 ` David Rientjes
2018-12-12 9:50 ` Michal Hocko
2018-12-12 17:00 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-12-14 11:32 ` Michal Hocko
2018-12-12 10:14 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-12-14 21:04 ` David Rientjes
2018-12-14 21:33 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-12-21 22:18 ` David Rientjes
2018-12-22 12:08 ` Mel Gorman
2018-12-14 23:11 ` Mel Gorman
2018-12-21 22:15 ` David Rientjes
2018-12-12 10:44 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2019-04-15 11:48 ` Michal Hocko
2018-12-06 0:18 ` David Rientjes
2018-12-06 0:54 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2018-12-06 9:23 ` Vlastimil Babka
2018-12-03 20:39 ` David Rientjes
2018-12-03 21:25 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2018-12-03 21:53 ` David Rientjes
2018-12-04 8:48 ` Michal Hocko
2018-12-05 0:07 ` David Rientjes
2018-12-05 10:18 ` Michal Hocko
2018-12-05 19:16 ` David Rientjes
2018-11-27 7:23 kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181203212539.GR31738@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@01.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=s.priebe@profihost.ag \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=zi.yan@cs.rutgers.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).