From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Michael Petlan <mpetlan@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] perf tests: Fix static build test
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2019 17:46:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190901154618.GA10402@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190901151528.GM28011@kernel.org>
On Sun, Sep 01, 2019 at 12:15:28PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Sun, Sep 01, 2019 at 02:48:20PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-ibdgg163291sx5m5xkojx5sq@git.kernel.org
>
>
> Can you explain why this is needed? Wat is the problem with building
> statically with those features? What happens when one tries to do it
> that way?
>
> I.e. what is this fixing?
sry, I have to disable VDSO and JVMTI for static build,
because they are shared libraries and just won't pass
with -static in LDFLAGS.. I wanted to throw it out,
because I'm confused that the test is passing for you
just like it is right now ;-)
I'll send out version with changelog
jirka
>
> - Arnaldo
>
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/tests/make | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/make b/tools/perf/tests/make
> > index 70c48475896d..17ee3facfd4d 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/tests/make
> > +++ b/tools/perf/tests/make
> > @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ make_install_info := install-info
> > make_install_pdf := install-pdf
> > make_install_prefix := install prefix=/tmp/krava
> > make_install_prefix_slash := install prefix=/tmp/krava/
> > -make_static := LDFLAGS=-static
> > +make_static := LDFLAGS=-static NO_PERF_READ_VDSO32=1 NO_JVMTI=1
> >
> > # all the NO_* variable combined
> > make_minimal := NO_LIBPERL=1 NO_LIBPYTHON=1 NO_NEWT=1 NO_GTK2=1
> > --
> > 2.21.0
>
> --
>
> - Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-01 15:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-01 12:48 [PATCH 0/4] perf tools: libperf related fixes Jiri Olsa
2019-09-01 12:48 ` [PATCH 1/4] perf tools: Fix python/perf.so compilation Jiri Olsa
2019-09-01 15:14 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-09-20 16:21 ` [tip: perf/urgent] perf python: Add missing python/perf.so dependency for libperf tip-bot2 for Jiri Olsa
2019-09-01 12:48 ` [PATCH 2/4] perf tests: Fix static build test Jiri Olsa
2019-09-01 15:15 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-09-01 15:46 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2019-09-01 12:48 ` [PATCH 3/4] perf tests: Add libperf automated test Jiri Olsa
2019-09-01 15:18 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-09-20 16:21 ` [tip: perf/urgent] perf tests: Add libperf automated test for 'make -C tools/perf build-test' tip-bot2 for Jiri Olsa
2019-09-01 12:48 ` [PATCH 4/4] libperf: Add missing event.h into install rule Jiri Olsa
2019-09-01 15:18 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-09-20 16:21 ` [tip: perf/urgent] libperf: Add missing event.h file to " tip-bot2 for Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190901154618.GA10402@krava \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mpetlan@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).