Re: [PATCH RFC 05/14] dt-bindings/interrupt-controller: pdc: add SPI config register

[Lina Iyer <ilina@codeaurora.org>]

On Mon, Sep 02 2019 at 07:58 -0600, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>On 02/09/2019 14:38, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 12:11:54PM -0600, Lina Iyer wrote:
>>> In addition to configuring the PDC, additional registers that interface
>>> the GIC have to be configured to match the GPIO type. The registers on
>>> some QCOM SoCs are access restricted, while on other SoCs are not. They
>>> SoCs with access restriction to these SPI registers need to be written
>>
>> Took me a minute to figure out this is GIC SPI interrupts, not SPI bus.
>>
>>> from the firmware using the SCM interface. Add a flag to indicate if the
>>> register is to be written using SCM interface.
>>>
>>> Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
>>> Signed-off-by: Lina Iyer <ilina@codeaurora.org>
>>> ---
>>>  .../bindings/interrupt-controller/qcom,pdc.txt           | 9 ++++++++-
>>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/qcom,pdc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/qcom,pdc.txt
>>> index 8e0797cb1487..852fcba98ea6 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/qcom,pdc.txt
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/qcom,pdc.txt
>>> @@ -50,15 +50,22 @@ Properties:
>>>  		    The second element is the GIC hwirq number for the PDC port.
>>>  		    The third element is the number of interrupts in sequence.
>>>
>>> +- qcom,scm-spi-cfg:
>>> +	Usage: optional
>>> +	Value type: <bool>
>>> +	Definition: Specifies if the SPI configuration registers have to be
>>> +		    written from the firmware.
>>> +
>>>  Example:
>>>
>>>  	pdc: interrupt-controller@b220000 {
>>>  		compatible = "qcom,sdm845-pdc";
>>> -		reg = <0xb220000 0x30000>;
>>> +		reg = <0xb220000 0x30000>, <0x179900f0 0x60>;
>>
>> There needs to be a description for reg updated. These aren't GIC
>> registers are they? Because those go in the GIC node.
>
They are not GIC registers. I will update this documentation.

>This is completely insane. Why are the GIC registers configured as
>secure the first place, if they are expected to be in control of the
>non-secure?
These are not GIC registers but located on the PDC interface to the GIC.
They may or may not be secure access controlled, depending on the SoC.

Thanks,
Lina