From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To: Nishanth Aravamudan <naravamudan@digitalocean.com>,
Julien Desfossez <jdesfossez@digitalocean.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Vineeth Pillai <viremana@linux.microsoft.com>,
Aaron Lu <aaron.lwe@gmail.com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.intel@gmail.com>,
tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
fweisbec@gmail.com, keescook@chromium.org, kerrnel@google.com,
Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
joel@joelfernandes.org, vineeth@bitbyteword.org,
Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>,
Agata Gruza <agata.gruza@intel.com>,
Antonio Gomez Iglesias <antonio.gomez.iglesias@intel.com>,
graf@amazon.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com, dfaggioli@suse.com,
pjt@google.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, derkling@google.com,
benbjiang@tencent.com,
Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>,
James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, OWeisse@umich.edu,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@oracle.com>,
Junaid Shahid <junaids@google.com>,
jsbarnes@google.com, chris.hyser@oracle.com,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@linux.alibaba.com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH -tip 07/32] sched: Add core wide task selection and scheduling.
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 18:19:37 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201117232003.3580179-8-joel@joelfernandes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201117232003.3580179-1-joel@joelfernandes.org>
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Instead of only selecting a local task, select a task for all SMT
siblings for every reschedule on the core (irrespective which logical
CPU does the reschedule).
Tested-by: Julien Desfossez <jdesfossez@digitalocean.com>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Julien Desfossez <jdesfossez@digitalocean.com>
Signed-off-by: Vineeth Remanan Pillai <viremana@linux.microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 301 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
kernel/sched/sched.h | 6 +-
2 files changed, 305 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 9d521033777f..1bd0b0bbb040 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -5029,7 +5029,7 @@ static void put_prev_task_balance(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev,
* Pick up the highest-prio task:
*/
static inline struct task_struct *
-pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
+__pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
{
const struct sched_class *class;
struct task_struct *p;
@@ -5070,6 +5070,294 @@ pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CORE
+static inline bool is_task_rq_idle(struct task_struct *t)
+{
+ return (task_rq(t)->idle == t);
+}
+
+static inline bool cookie_equals(struct task_struct *a, unsigned long cookie)
+{
+ return is_task_rq_idle(a) || (a->core_cookie == cookie);
+}
+
+static inline bool cookie_match(struct task_struct *a, struct task_struct *b)
+{
+ if (is_task_rq_idle(a) || is_task_rq_idle(b))
+ return true;
+
+ return a->core_cookie == b->core_cookie;
+}
+
+// XXX fairness/fwd progress conditions
+/*
+ * Returns
+ * - NULL if there is no runnable task for this class.
+ * - the highest priority task for this runqueue if it matches
+ * rq->core->core_cookie or its priority is greater than max.
+ * - Else returns idle_task.
+ */
+static struct task_struct *
+pick_task(struct rq *rq, const struct sched_class *class, struct task_struct *max)
+{
+ struct task_struct *class_pick, *cookie_pick;
+ unsigned long cookie = rq->core->core_cookie;
+
+ class_pick = class->pick_task(rq);
+ if (!class_pick)
+ return NULL;
+
+ if (!cookie) {
+ /*
+ * If class_pick is tagged, return it only if it has
+ * higher priority than max.
+ */
+ if (max && class_pick->core_cookie &&
+ prio_less(class_pick, max))
+ return idle_sched_class.pick_task(rq);
+
+ return class_pick;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * If class_pick is idle or matches cookie, return early.
+ */
+ if (cookie_equals(class_pick, cookie))
+ return class_pick;
+
+ cookie_pick = sched_core_find(rq, cookie);
+
+ /*
+ * If class > max && class > cookie, it is the highest priority task on
+ * the core (so far) and it must be selected, otherwise we must go with
+ * the cookie pick in order to satisfy the constraint.
+ */
+ if (prio_less(cookie_pick, class_pick) &&
+ (!max || prio_less(max, class_pick)))
+ return class_pick;
+
+ return cookie_pick;
+}
+
+static struct task_struct *
+pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
+{
+ struct task_struct *next, *max = NULL;
+ const struct sched_class *class;
+ const struct cpumask *smt_mask;
+ bool need_sync;
+ int i, j, cpu;
+
+ if (!sched_core_enabled(rq))
+ return __pick_next_task(rq, prev, rf);
+
+ cpu = cpu_of(rq);
+
+ /* Stopper task is switching into idle, no need core-wide selection. */
+ if (cpu_is_offline(cpu)) {
+ /*
+ * Reset core_pick so that we don't enter the fastpath when
+ * coming online. core_pick would already be migrated to
+ * another cpu during offline.
+ */
+ rq->core_pick = NULL;
+ return __pick_next_task(rq, prev, rf);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * If there were no {en,de}queues since we picked (IOW, the task
+ * pointers are all still valid), and we haven't scheduled the last
+ * pick yet, do so now.
+ *
+ * rq->core_pick can be NULL if no selection was made for a CPU because
+ * it was either offline or went offline during a sibling's core-wide
+ * selection. In this case, do a core-wide selection.
+ */
+ if (rq->core->core_pick_seq == rq->core->core_task_seq &&
+ rq->core->core_pick_seq != rq->core_sched_seq &&
+ rq->core_pick) {
+ WRITE_ONCE(rq->core_sched_seq, rq->core->core_pick_seq);
+
+ next = rq->core_pick;
+ if (next != prev) {
+ put_prev_task(rq, prev);
+ set_next_task(rq, next);
+ }
+
+ rq->core_pick = NULL;
+ return next;
+ }
+
+ put_prev_task_balance(rq, prev, rf);
+
+ smt_mask = cpu_smt_mask(cpu);
+
+ /*
+ * core->core_task_seq, core->core_pick_seq, rq->core_sched_seq
+ *
+ * @task_seq guards the task state ({en,de}queues)
+ * @pick_seq is the @task_seq we did a selection on
+ * @sched_seq is the @pick_seq we scheduled
+ *
+ * However, preemptions can cause multiple picks on the same task set.
+ * 'Fix' this by also increasing @task_seq for every pick.
+ */
+ rq->core->core_task_seq++;
+ need_sync = !!rq->core->core_cookie;
+
+ /* reset state */
+ rq->core->core_cookie = 0UL;
+ for_each_cpu(i, smt_mask) {
+ struct rq *rq_i = cpu_rq(i);
+
+ rq_i->core_pick = NULL;
+
+ if (rq_i->core_forceidle) {
+ need_sync = true;
+ rq_i->core_forceidle = false;
+ }
+
+ if (i != cpu)
+ update_rq_clock(rq_i);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Try and select tasks for each sibling in decending sched_class
+ * order.
+ */
+ for_each_class(class) {
+again:
+ for_each_cpu_wrap(i, smt_mask, cpu) {
+ struct rq *rq_i = cpu_rq(i);
+ struct task_struct *p;
+
+ if (rq_i->core_pick)
+ continue;
+
+ /*
+ * If this sibling doesn't yet have a suitable task to
+ * run; ask for the most elegible task, given the
+ * highest priority task already selected for this
+ * core.
+ */
+ p = pick_task(rq_i, class, max);
+ if (!p) {
+ /*
+ * If there weren't no cookies; we don't need to
+ * bother with the other siblings.
+ * If the rest of the core is not running a tagged
+ * task, i.e. need_sync == 0, and the current CPU
+ * which called into the schedule() loop does not
+ * have any tasks for this class, skip selecting for
+ * other siblings since there's no point. We don't skip
+ * for RT/DL because that could make CFS force-idle RT.
+ */
+ if (i == cpu && !need_sync && class == &fair_sched_class)
+ goto next_class;
+
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Optimize the 'normal' case where there aren't any
+ * cookies and we don't need to sync up.
+ */
+ if (i == cpu && !need_sync && !p->core_cookie) {
+ next = p;
+ goto done;
+ }
+
+ rq_i->core_pick = p;
+
+ /*
+ * If this new candidate is of higher priority than the
+ * previous; and they're incompatible; we need to wipe
+ * the slate and start over. pick_task makes sure that
+ * p's priority is more than max if it doesn't match
+ * max's cookie.
+ *
+ * NOTE: this is a linear max-filter and is thus bounded
+ * in execution time.
+ */
+ if (!max || !cookie_match(max, p)) {
+ struct task_struct *old_max = max;
+
+ rq->core->core_cookie = p->core_cookie;
+ max = p;
+
+ if (old_max) {
+ for_each_cpu(j, smt_mask) {
+ if (j == i)
+ continue;
+
+ cpu_rq(j)->core_pick = NULL;
+ }
+ goto again;
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * Once we select a task for a cpu, we
+ * should not be doing an unconstrained
+ * pick because it might starve a task
+ * on a forced idle cpu.
+ */
+ need_sync = true;
+ }
+
+ }
+ }
+next_class:;
+ }
+
+ rq->core->core_pick_seq = rq->core->core_task_seq;
+ next = rq->core_pick;
+ rq->core_sched_seq = rq->core->core_pick_seq;
+
+ /* Something should have been selected for current CPU */
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!next);
+
+ /*
+ * Reschedule siblings
+ *
+ * NOTE: L1TF -- at this point we're no longer running the old task and
+ * sending an IPI (below) ensures the sibling will no longer be running
+ * their task. This ensures there is no inter-sibling overlap between
+ * non-matching user state.
+ */
+ for_each_cpu(i, smt_mask) {
+ struct rq *rq_i = cpu_rq(i);
+
+ /*
+ * An online sibling might have gone offline before a task
+ * could be picked for it, or it might be offline but later
+ * happen to come online, but its too late and nothing was
+ * picked for it. That's Ok - it will pick tasks for itself,
+ * so ignore it.
+ */
+ if (!rq_i->core_pick)
+ continue;
+
+ if (is_task_rq_idle(rq_i->core_pick) && rq_i->nr_running)
+ rq_i->core_forceidle = true;
+
+ if (i == cpu) {
+ rq_i->core_pick = NULL;
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ /* Did we break L1TF mitigation requirements? */
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!cookie_match(next, rq_i->core_pick));
+
+ if (rq_i->curr == rq_i->core_pick) {
+ rq_i->core_pick = NULL;
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ resched_curr(rq_i);
+ }
+
+done:
+ set_next_task(rq, next);
+ return next;
+}
static inline void sched_core_cpu_starting(unsigned int cpu)
{
@@ -5103,6 +5391,12 @@ static inline void sched_core_cpu_starting(unsigned int cpu)
static inline void sched_core_cpu_starting(unsigned int cpu) {}
+static struct task_struct *
+pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf)
+{
+ return __pick_next_task(rq, prev, rf);
+}
+
#endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_CORE */
/*
@@ -7999,7 +8293,12 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CORE
rq->core = NULL;
+ rq->core_pick = NULL;
rq->core_enabled = 0;
+ rq->core_tree = RB_ROOT;
+ rq->core_forceidle = false;
+
+ rq->core_cookie = 0UL;
#endif
}
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 8ee0ca8ee5c3..63b28e1843ee 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -1065,11 +1065,16 @@ struct rq {
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CORE
/* per rq */
struct rq *core;
+ struct task_struct *core_pick;
unsigned int core_enabled;
+ unsigned int core_sched_seq;
struct rb_root core_tree;
+ unsigned char core_forceidle;
/* shared state */
unsigned int core_task_seq;
+ unsigned int core_pick_seq;
+ unsigned long core_cookie;
#endif
};
@@ -1977,7 +1982,6 @@ static inline void put_prev_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
static inline void set_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *next)
{
- WARN_ON_ONCE(rq->curr != next);
next->sched_class->set_next_task(rq, next, false);
}
--
2.29.2.299.gdc1121823c-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-17 23:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 150+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-17 23:19 [PATCH -tip 00/32] Core scheduling (v9) Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 01/32] sched: Wrap rq::lock access Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-19 23:31 ` Singh, Balbir
2020-11-20 16:55 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-22 8:52 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 02/32] sched: Introduce sched_class::pick_task() Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-19 23:56 ` Singh, Balbir
2020-11-20 16:58 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-25 23:19 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-25 16:28 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-11-26 9:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-26 10:17 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-11-26 12:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 03/32] sched/fair: Fix pick_task_fair crashes due to empty rbtree Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-20 10:15 ` Singh, Balbir
2020-11-20 18:11 ` Vineeth Pillai
2020-11-23 22:31 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-24 8:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 04/32] sched: Core-wide rq->lock Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-22 9:11 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-24 8:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-26 0:35 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 05/32] sched/fair: Add a few assertions Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 06/32] sched: Basic tracking of matching tasks Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-17 23:19 ` Joel Fernandes (Google) [this message]
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 08/32] sched/fair: Fix forced idle sibling starvation corner case Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-22 10:35 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 09/32] sched/fair: Snapshot the min_vruntime of CPUs on force idle Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-22 11:44 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-23 12:31 ` Vineeth Pillai
2020-11-23 23:31 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-24 9:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-25 23:17 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-26 8:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 10/32] sched: Fix priority inversion of cookied task with sibling Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-22 22:41 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-24 18:30 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-25 23:05 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-26 8:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-26 22:27 ` Balbir Singh
2020-12-01 17:49 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 11/32] sched: Enqueue task into core queue only after vruntime is updated Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 12/32] sched: Simplify the core pick loop for optimized case Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-24 12:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-24 17:04 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-25 8:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 13/32] sched: Trivial forced-newidle balancer Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-23 4:38 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-23 15:07 ` Li, Aubrey
2020-11-23 23:35 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-24 0:32 ` Li, Aubrey
2020-11-25 21:28 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 14/32] sched: migration changes for core scheduling Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-22 23:54 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-23 4:36 ` Li, Aubrey
2020-11-24 15:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-25 3:12 ` Li, Aubrey
2020-11-25 22:57 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-26 3:20 ` Li, Aubrey
2020-11-26 8:32 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-26 9:26 ` Li, Aubrey
2020-11-30 9:33 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-30 12:29 ` Li, Aubrey
2020-12-02 14:09 ` Li, Aubrey
2020-12-03 1:06 ` Li, Aubrey
2020-11-30 10:35 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-11-30 12:32 ` Li, Aubrey
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 15/32] sched: Improve snapshotting of min_vruntime for CGroups Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-24 10:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-24 17:07 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-25 8:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-24 10:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 16/32] irq_work: Cleanup Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 17/32] arch/x86: Add a new TIF flag for untrusted tasks Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-23 5:18 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 18/32] kernel/entry: Add support for core-wide protection of kernel-mode Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-24 16:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-24 17:52 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-25 9:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-01 17:55 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-26 5:37 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 19/32] entry/idle: Enter and exit kernel protection during idle entry and exit Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-24 16:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-24 18:03 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-25 8:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-01 18:24 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 20/32] entry/kvm: Protect the kernel when entering from guest Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 21/32] sched: CGroup tagging interface for core scheduling Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 22/32] sched: Split the cookie and setup per-task cookie on fork Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-25 11:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-01 18:56 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-25 11:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-01 19:20 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-12-01 19:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-02 6:36 ` Josh Don
2020-12-02 7:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-04 0:20 ` Josh Don
2020-12-06 17:49 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-25 11:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-01 19:16 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-25 11:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-01 19:11 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-12-01 19:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-06 18:15 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-25 12:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-01 18:38 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-25 13:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-01 18:52 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-30 23:05 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 23/32] sched: Add a per-thread core scheduling interface Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-25 13:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-01 19:36 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-12-02 21:47 ` Chris Hyser
2020-12-02 23:13 ` chris hyser
2020-12-06 17:34 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-12-07 21:48 ` chris hyser
2020-12-09 18:52 ` Chris Hyser
2020-12-14 19:31 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-12-14 19:44 ` chris hyser
2020-12-14 23:25 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-12-15 14:56 ` chris hyser
2020-12-15 16:23 ` chris hyser
2020-12-15 18:13 ` Dhaval Giani
2020-12-16 0:35 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 24/32] sched: Release references to the per-task cookie on exit Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-25 13:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 25/32] sched: Refactor core cookie into struct Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 26/32] sched: Add a second-level tag for nested CGroup usecase Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-25 13:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-30 23:10 ` Balbir Singh
2020-12-01 20:08 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-12-02 6:18 ` Josh Don
2020-12-02 8:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-02 18:53 ` Tejun Heo
2020-12-04 0:51 ` Josh Don
2020-12-04 15:45 ` Tejun Heo
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 27/32] sched/debug: Add CGroup node for printing group cookie if SCHED_DEBUG Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 28/32] kselftest: Add tests for core-sched interface Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 29/32] sched: Move core-scheduler interfacing code to a new file Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-17 23:20 ` [PATCH -tip 30/32] Documentation: Add core scheduling documentation Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-17 23:20 ` [PATCH -tip 31/32] sched: Add a coresched command line option Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-19 23:39 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-11-25 13:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-26 0:11 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-17 23:20 ` [PATCH -tip 32/32] sched: Debug bits Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-12-01 0:21 ` Balbir Singh
2021-01-15 15:10 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-24 11:48 ` [PATCH -tip 00/32] Core scheduling (v9) Vincent Guittot
2020-11-24 15:08 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-12-03 6:16 ` Ning, Hongyu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201117232003.3580179-8-joel@joelfernandes.org \
--to=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=OWeisse@umich.edu \
--cc=aaron.lu@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=aaron.lwe@gmail.com \
--cc=agata.gruza@intel.com \
--cc=alexandre.chartre@oracle.com \
--cc=antonio.gomez.iglesias@intel.com \
--cc=aubrey.intel@gmail.com \
--cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
--cc=benbjiang@tencent.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=chris.hyser@oracle.com \
--cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
--cc=derkling@google.com \
--cc=dfaggioli@suse.com \
--cc=dhaval.giani@oracle.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=jdesfossez@digitalocean.com \
--cc=joshdon@google.com \
--cc=jsbarnes@google.com \
--cc=junaids@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kerrnel@google.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=naravamudan@digitalocean.com \
--cc=pauld@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=vineeth@bitbyteword.org \
--cc=viremana@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).