From: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@gmail.com>
To: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: Nishanth Aravamudan <naravamudan@digitalocean.com>,
Julien Desfossez <jdesfossez@digitalocean.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
Vineeth Pillai <viremana@linux.microsoft.com>,
Aaron Lu <aaron.lwe@gmail.com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.intel@gmail.com>,
tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mingo@kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
fweisbec@gmail.com, keescook@chromium.org, kerrnel@google.com,
Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
vineeth@bitbyteword.org, Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>,
Agata Gruza <agata.gruza@intel.com>,
Antonio Gomez Iglesias <antonio.gomez.iglesias@intel.com>,
graf@amazon.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com, dfaggioli@suse.com,
pjt@google.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, derkling@google.com,
benbjiang@tencent.com,
Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>,
James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, OWeisse@umich.edu,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@oracle.com>,
Junaid Shahid <junaids@google.com>,
jsbarnes@google.com, chris.hyser@oracle.com,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>, Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip 22/32] sched: Split the cookie and setup per-task cookie on fork
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 10:05:27 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201130230527.GE473773@balbir-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201117232003.3580179-23-joel@joelfernandes.org>
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 06:19:52PM -0500, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> In order to prevent interference and clearly support both per-task and CGroup
> APIs, split the cookie into 2 and allow it to be set from either per-task, or
> CGroup API. The final cookie is the combined value of both and is computed when
> the stop-machine executes during a change of cookie.
>
> Also, for the per-task cookie, it will get weird if we use pointers of any
> emphemeral objects. For this reason, introduce a refcounted object who's sole
> purpose is to assign unique cookie value by way of the object's pointer.
>
> While at it, refactor the CGroup code a bit. Future patches will introduce more
> APIs and support.
>
> Reviewed-by: Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>
> Tested-by: Julien Desfossez <jdesfossez@digitalocean.com>
> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
> ---
> include/linux/sched.h | 2 +
> kernel/sched/core.c | 241 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> kernel/sched/debug.c | 4 +
> 3 files changed, 236 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index a60868165590..c6a3b0fa952b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -688,6 +688,8 @@ struct task_struct {
> #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CORE
> struct rb_node core_node;
> unsigned long core_cookie;
> + unsigned long core_task_cookie;
> + unsigned long core_group_cookie;
> unsigned int core_occupation;
> #endif
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index b99a7493d590..7ccca355623a 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -346,11 +346,14 @@ void sched_core_put(void)
> mutex_unlock(&sched_core_mutex);
> }
>
> +static int sched_core_share_tasks(struct task_struct *t1, struct task_struct *t2);
> +
> #else /* !CONFIG_SCHED_CORE */
>
> static inline void sched_core_enqueue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) { }
> static inline void sched_core_dequeue(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p) { }
> static bool sched_core_enqueued(struct task_struct *task) { return false; }
> +static int sched_core_share_tasks(struct task_struct *t1, struct task_struct *t2) { }
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_SCHED_CORE */
>
> @@ -4032,6 +4035,20 @@ int sched_fork(unsigned long clone_flags, struct task_struct *p)
> #endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CORE
> RB_CLEAR_NODE(&p->core_node);
> +
> + /*
> + * Tag child via per-task cookie only if parent is tagged via per-task
> + * cookie. This is independent of, but can be additive to the CGroup tagging.
> + */
> + if (current->core_task_cookie) {
> +
> + /* If it is not CLONE_THREAD fork, assign a unique per-task tag. */
> + if (!(clone_flags & CLONE_THREAD)) {
> + return sched_core_share_tasks(p, p);
> + }
> + /* Otherwise share the parent's per-task tag. */
> + return sched_core_share_tasks(p, current);
> + }
> #endif
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -9731,6 +9748,217 @@ static u64 cpu_rt_period_read_uint(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css,
> #endif /* CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED */
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CORE
> +/*
> + * A simple wrapper around refcount. An allocated sched_core_cookie's
> + * address is used to compute the cookie of the task.
> + */
> +struct sched_core_cookie {
> + refcount_t refcnt;
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * sched_core_tag_requeue - Common helper for all interfaces to set a cookie.
> + * @p: The task to assign a cookie to.
> + * @cookie: The cookie to assign.
> + * @group: is it a group interface or a per-task interface.
> + *
> + * This function is typically called from a stop-machine handler.
Can you clarify if it is typically or always, what are the implications for
locking?
> + */
> +void sched_core_tag_requeue(struct task_struct *p, unsigned long cookie, bool group)
> +{
> + if (!p)
> + return;
> +
> + if (group)
> + p->core_group_cookie = cookie;
> + else
> + p->core_task_cookie = cookie;
> +
> + /* Use up half of the cookie's bits for task cookie and remaining for group cookie. */
> + p->core_cookie = (p->core_task_cookie <<
> + (sizeof(unsigned long) * 4)) + p->core_group_cookie;
> +
Always use masks to ensure this fits in the space we have, should we be concerned about
overflows and the potential for collision of cookie values?
> + if (sched_core_enqueued(p)) {
> + sched_core_dequeue(task_rq(p), p);
> + if (!p->core_task_cookie)
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (sched_core_enabled(task_rq(p)) &&
> + p->core_cookie && task_on_rq_queued(p))
> + sched_core_enqueue(task_rq(p), p);
> +}
> +
> +/* Per-task interface */
> +static unsigned long sched_core_alloc_task_cookie(void)
> +{
> + struct sched_core_cookie *ptr =
> + kmalloc(sizeof(struct sched_core_cookie), GFP_KERNEL);
> +
> + if (!ptr)
> + return 0;
> + refcount_set(&ptr->refcnt, 1);
> +
> + /*
> + * NOTE: sched_core_put() is not done by put_task_cookie(). Instead, it
> + * is done after the stopper runs.
> + */
> + sched_core_get();
> + return (unsigned long)ptr;
> +}
> +
> +static bool sched_core_get_task_cookie(unsigned long cookie)
> +{
> + struct sched_core_cookie *ptr = (struct sched_core_cookie *)cookie;
> +
> + /*
> + * NOTE: sched_core_put() is not done by put_task_cookie(). Instead, it
> + * is done after the stopper runs.
> + */
> + sched_core_get();
> + return refcount_inc_not_zero(&ptr->refcnt);
> +}
> +
> +static void sched_core_put_task_cookie(unsigned long cookie)
> +{
> + struct sched_core_cookie *ptr = (struct sched_core_cookie *)cookie;
> +
> + if (refcount_dec_and_test(&ptr->refcnt))
> + kfree(ptr);
> +}
> +
> +struct sched_core_task_write_tag {
> + struct task_struct *tasks[2];
> + unsigned long cookies[2];
> +};
Use a better name instead of 2?
> +
> +/*
> + * Ensure that the task has been requeued. The stopper ensures that the task cannot
> + * be migrated to a different CPU while its core scheduler queue state is being updated.
> + * It also makes sure to requeue a task if it was running actively on another CPU.
> + */
> +static int sched_core_task_join_stopper(void *data)
> +{
> + struct sched_core_task_write_tag *tag = (struct sched_core_task_write_tag *)data;
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < 2; i++)
Use ARRAY_SIZE(cookies) if you have to or ARRAY_SIZE(tasks)
> + sched_core_tag_requeue(tag->tasks[i], tag->cookies[i], false /* !group */);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int sched_core_share_tasks(struct task_struct *t1, struct task_struct *t2)
> +{
Can you please explain how t1 and t2 are related, there is a table below, but
I don't understand case#2, where the cookies get reset, is t2 the core leader
and t2 leads what t1 and t2 collectively get?
May be just called t2 as parent?
> + struct sched_core_task_write_tag wr = {}; /* for stop machine. */
> + bool sched_core_put_after_stopper = false;
> + unsigned long cookie;
> + int ret = -ENOMEM;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&sched_core_mutex);
> +
> + /*
> + * NOTE: sched_core_get() is done by sched_core_alloc_task_cookie() or
> + * sched_core_put_task_cookie(). However, sched_core_put() is done
> + * by this function *after* the stopper removes the tasks from the
> + * core queue, and not before. This is just to play it safe.
> + */
> + if (t2 == NULL) {
> + if (t1->core_task_cookie) {
> + sched_core_put_task_cookie(t1->core_task_cookie);
> + sched_core_put_after_stopper = true;
> + wr.tasks[0] = t1; /* Keep wr.cookies[0] reset for t1. */
> + }
> + } else if (t1 == t2) {
> + /* Assign a unique per-task cookie solely for t1. */
> +
> + cookie = sched_core_alloc_task_cookie();
> + if (!cookie)
> + goto out_unlock;
> +
> + if (t1->core_task_cookie) {
> + sched_core_put_task_cookie(t1->core_task_cookie);
> + sched_core_put_after_stopper = true;
> + }
> + wr.tasks[0] = t1;
> + wr.cookies[0] = cookie;
> + } else
> + /*
> + * t1 joining t2
> + * CASE 1:
> + * before 0 0
> + * after new cookie new cookie
> + *
> + * CASE 2:
> + * before X (non-zero) 0
> + * after 0 0
> + *
> + * CASE 3:
> + * before 0 X (non-zero)
> + * after X X
> + *
> + * CASE 4:
> + * before Y (non-zero) X (non-zero)
> + * after X X
> + */
> + if (!t1->core_task_cookie && !t2->core_task_cookie) {
> + /* CASE 1. */
> + cookie = sched_core_alloc_task_cookie();
> + if (!cookie)
> + goto out_unlock;
> +
> + /* Add another reference for the other task. */
> + if (!sched_core_get_task_cookie(cookie)) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out_unlock;
> + }
> +
> + wr.tasks[0] = t1;
> + wr.tasks[1] = t2;
> + wr.cookies[0] = wr.cookies[1] = cookie;
> +
> + } else if (t1->core_task_cookie && !t2->core_task_cookie) {
> + /* CASE 2. */
> + sched_core_put_task_cookie(t1->core_task_cookie);
> + sched_core_put_after_stopper = true;
> +
> + wr.tasks[0] = t1; /* Reset cookie for t1. */
> +
> + } else if (!t1->core_task_cookie && t2->core_task_cookie) {
> + /* CASE 3. */
> + if (!sched_core_get_task_cookie(t2->core_task_cookie)) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out_unlock;
> + }
> +
> + wr.tasks[0] = t1;
> + wr.cookies[0] = t2->core_task_cookie;
> +
> + } else {
> + /* CASE 4. */
> + if (!sched_core_get_task_cookie(t2->core_task_cookie)) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out_unlock;
> + }
> + sched_core_put_task_cookie(t1->core_task_cookie);
> + sched_core_put_after_stopper = true;
> +
> + wr.tasks[0] = t1;
> + wr.cookies[0] = t2->core_task_cookie;
> + }
> +
> + stop_machine(sched_core_task_join_stopper, (void *)&wr, NULL);
> +
> + if (sched_core_put_after_stopper)
> + sched_core_put();
> +
> + ret = 0;
> +out_unlock:
> + mutex_unlock(&sched_core_mutex);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/* CGroup interface */
> static u64 cpu_core_tag_read_u64(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css, struct cftype *cft)
> {
> struct task_group *tg = css_tg(css);
> @@ -9761,18 +9989,9 @@ static int __sched_write_tag(void *data)
> * when we set cgroup tag to 0 when the loop is done below.
> */
> while ((p = css_task_iter_next(&it))) {
> - p->core_cookie = !!val ? (unsigned long)tg : 0UL;
> -
> - if (sched_core_enqueued(p)) {
> - sched_core_dequeue(task_rq(p), p);
> - if (!p->core_cookie)
> - continue;
> - }
> -
> - if (sched_core_enabled(task_rq(p)) &&
> - p->core_cookie && task_on_rq_queued(p))
> - sched_core_enqueue(task_rq(p), p);
> + unsigned long cookie = !!val ? (unsigned long)tg : 0UL;
>
> + sched_core_tag_requeue(p, cookie, true /* group */);
> }
> css_task_iter_end(&it);
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/debug.c b/kernel/sched/debug.c
> index 60a922d3f46f..8c452b8010ad 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/debug.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/debug.c
> @@ -1024,6 +1024,10 @@ void proc_sched_show_task(struct task_struct *p, struct pid_namespace *ns,
> __PS("clock-delta", t1-t0);
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CORE
> + __PS("core_cookie", p->core_cookie);
> +#endif
> +
> sched_show_numa(p, m);
> }
>
Balbir Singh.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-30 23:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 150+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-17 23:19 [PATCH -tip 00/32] Core scheduling (v9) Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 01/32] sched: Wrap rq::lock access Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-19 23:31 ` Singh, Balbir
2020-11-20 16:55 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-22 8:52 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 02/32] sched: Introduce sched_class::pick_task() Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-19 23:56 ` Singh, Balbir
2020-11-20 16:58 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-25 23:19 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-25 16:28 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-11-26 9:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-26 10:17 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-11-26 12:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 03/32] sched/fair: Fix pick_task_fair crashes due to empty rbtree Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-20 10:15 ` Singh, Balbir
2020-11-20 18:11 ` Vineeth Pillai
2020-11-23 22:31 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-24 8:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 04/32] sched: Core-wide rq->lock Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-22 9:11 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-24 8:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-26 0:35 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 05/32] sched/fair: Add a few assertions Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 06/32] sched: Basic tracking of matching tasks Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 07/32] sched: Add core wide task selection and scheduling Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 08/32] sched/fair: Fix forced idle sibling starvation corner case Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-22 10:35 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 09/32] sched/fair: Snapshot the min_vruntime of CPUs on force idle Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-22 11:44 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-23 12:31 ` Vineeth Pillai
2020-11-23 23:31 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-24 9:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-25 23:17 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-26 8:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 10/32] sched: Fix priority inversion of cookied task with sibling Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-22 22:41 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-24 18:30 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-25 23:05 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-26 8:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-26 22:27 ` Balbir Singh
2020-12-01 17:49 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 11/32] sched: Enqueue task into core queue only after vruntime is updated Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 12/32] sched: Simplify the core pick loop for optimized case Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-24 12:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-24 17:04 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-25 8:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 13/32] sched: Trivial forced-newidle balancer Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-23 4:38 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-23 15:07 ` Li, Aubrey
2020-11-23 23:35 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-24 0:32 ` Li, Aubrey
2020-11-25 21:28 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 14/32] sched: migration changes for core scheduling Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-22 23:54 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-23 4:36 ` Li, Aubrey
2020-11-24 15:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-25 3:12 ` Li, Aubrey
2020-11-25 22:57 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-26 3:20 ` Li, Aubrey
2020-11-26 8:32 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-26 9:26 ` Li, Aubrey
2020-11-30 9:33 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-30 12:29 ` Li, Aubrey
2020-12-02 14:09 ` Li, Aubrey
2020-12-03 1:06 ` Li, Aubrey
2020-11-30 10:35 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-11-30 12:32 ` Li, Aubrey
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 15/32] sched: Improve snapshotting of min_vruntime for CGroups Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-24 10:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-24 17:07 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-25 8:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-24 10:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 16/32] irq_work: Cleanup Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 17/32] arch/x86: Add a new TIF flag for untrusted tasks Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-23 5:18 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 18/32] kernel/entry: Add support for core-wide protection of kernel-mode Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-24 16:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-24 17:52 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-25 9:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-01 17:55 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-26 5:37 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 19/32] entry/idle: Enter and exit kernel protection during idle entry and exit Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-24 16:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-24 18:03 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-25 8:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-01 18:24 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 20/32] entry/kvm: Protect the kernel when entering from guest Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 21/32] sched: CGroup tagging interface for core scheduling Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 22/32] sched: Split the cookie and setup per-task cookie on fork Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-25 11:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-01 18:56 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-25 11:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-01 19:20 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-12-01 19:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-02 6:36 ` Josh Don
2020-12-02 7:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-04 0:20 ` Josh Don
2020-12-06 17:49 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-25 11:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-01 19:16 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-25 11:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-01 19:11 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-12-01 19:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-06 18:15 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-25 12:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-01 18:38 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-25 13:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-01 18:52 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-30 23:05 ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 23/32] sched: Add a per-thread core scheduling interface Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-25 13:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-01 19:36 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-12-02 21:47 ` Chris Hyser
2020-12-02 23:13 ` chris hyser
2020-12-06 17:34 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-12-07 21:48 ` chris hyser
2020-12-09 18:52 ` Chris Hyser
2020-12-14 19:31 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-12-14 19:44 ` chris hyser
2020-12-14 23:25 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-12-15 14:56 ` chris hyser
2020-12-15 16:23 ` chris hyser
2020-12-15 18:13 ` Dhaval Giani
2020-12-16 0:35 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 24/32] sched: Release references to the per-task cookie on exit Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-25 13:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 25/32] sched: Refactor core cookie into struct Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 26/32] sched: Add a second-level tag for nested CGroup usecase Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-25 13:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-30 23:10 ` Balbir Singh
2020-12-01 20:08 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-12-02 6:18 ` Josh Don
2020-12-02 8:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-02 18:53 ` Tejun Heo
2020-12-04 0:51 ` Josh Don
2020-12-04 15:45 ` Tejun Heo
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 27/32] sched/debug: Add CGroup node for printing group cookie if SCHED_DEBUG Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 28/32] kselftest: Add tests for core-sched interface Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-17 23:19 ` [PATCH -tip 29/32] sched: Move core-scheduler interfacing code to a new file Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-17 23:20 ` [PATCH -tip 30/32] Documentation: Add core scheduling documentation Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-17 23:20 ` [PATCH -tip 31/32] sched: Add a coresched command line option Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-11-19 23:39 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-11-25 13:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-26 0:11 ` Balbir Singh
2020-11-17 23:20 ` [PATCH -tip 32/32] sched: Debug bits Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-12-01 0:21 ` Balbir Singh
2021-01-15 15:10 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-11-24 11:48 ` [PATCH -tip 00/32] Core scheduling (v9) Vincent Guittot
2020-11-24 15:08 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-12-03 6:16 ` Ning, Hongyu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201130230527.GE473773@balbir-desktop \
--to=bsingharora@gmail.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=OWeisse@umich.edu \
--cc=aaron.lwe@gmail.com \
--cc=agata.gruza@intel.com \
--cc=alexandre.chartre@oracle.com \
--cc=antonio.gomez.iglesias@intel.com \
--cc=aubrey.intel@gmail.com \
--cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
--cc=benbjiang@tencent.com \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=chris.hyser@oracle.com \
--cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
--cc=derkling@google.com \
--cc=dfaggioli@suse.com \
--cc=dhaval.giani@oracle.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=jdesfossez@digitalocean.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=joshdon@google.com \
--cc=jsbarnes@google.com \
--cc=junaids@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kerrnel@google.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=naravamudan@digitalocean.com \
--cc=pauld@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=vineeth@bitbyteword.org \
--cc=viremana@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).