From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: laniel_francis@privacyrequired.com
Cc: linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dja@axtens.net,
keescook@chromium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] Fortify strscpy()
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 17:35:43 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201119173543.8821881942022fc4f39c4c73@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201119164915.10618-1-laniel_francis@privacyrequired.com>
On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 17:49:10 +0100 laniel_francis@privacyrequired.com wrote:
> From: Francis Laniel <laniel_francis@privacyrequired.com>
>
> Hi.
>
>
> I hope your families, friends and yourselves are fine.
Thanks. You too ;)
> This patch set answers to this issue:
> https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/46
I fail to understand what this patchset has to do with that
one-element-array issue :(
> I based my modifications on top of two patches from Daniel Axtens which modify
> calls to __builtin_object_size to ensure the true size of char * are returned
> and not the surrounding structure size.
>
> To sum up, in my first patch I implemented a fortified version of strscpy.
> This new version ensures the following before calling vanilla strscpy:
> 1. There is no read overflow because either size is smaller than src length
> or we shrink size to src length by calling fortified strnlen.
> 2. There is no write overflow because we either failed during compilation or at
> runtime by checking that size is smaller than dest size.
> The second patch brings a new file in LKDTM driver to test this new version.
> The test ensures the fortified version still returns the same value as the
> vanilla one while panic'ing when there is a write overflow.
> The third just corrects some typos in LKDTM related file.
>
> If you see any problem or way to improve the code, feel free to share it.
Could you please send along a reworked [0/n] cover letter? Explain in
your own words, without requiring that readers go off and read web
pages
- What problem the patchset solves
- How it solves it
- The value of the patchset (to kernel developers or to end-users) so that we
can understand why it should be merged.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-20 1:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-19 16:49 [PATCH v6 0/5] Fortify strscpy() laniel_francis
2020-11-19 16:49 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] string.h: detect intra-object overflow in fortified string functions laniel_francis
2020-11-20 1:38 ` Andrew Morton
2020-11-20 9:41 ` Francis Laniel
2020-11-19 16:49 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] lkdtm: tests for FORTIFY_SOURCE laniel_francis
2020-11-19 16:49 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] string.h: Add FORTIFY coverage for strscpy() laniel_francis
2020-11-19 16:49 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] Add new file in LKDTM to test fortified strscpy laniel_francis
2020-11-19 16:49 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] Correct wrong filenames in comment laniel_francis
2020-11-20 1:35 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2020-11-20 9:40 ` [PATCH v6 0/5] Fortify strscpy() Francis Laniel
2020-11-20 19:52 ` Kees Cook
2020-11-22 16:28 ` Francis Laniel
2020-11-20 13:33 ` David Laight
2020-11-20 15:51 ` Francis Laniel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201119173543.8821881942022fc4f39c4c73@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dja@axtens.net \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=laniel_francis@privacyrequired.com \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).