From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, devel@acpica.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
lenb@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com,
andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
bgolaszewski@baylibre.com, wsa@kernel.org, yong.zhi@intel.com,
sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com, bingbu.cao@intel.com,
tian.shu.qiu@intel.com, mchehab@kernel.org,
robert.moore@intel.com, erik.kaneda@intel.com, pmladek@suse.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com,
linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk,
kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com,
jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org,
laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com,
jorhand@linux.microsoft.com, kitakar@gmail.com,
heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/18] software_node: Add support for fwnode_graph*() family of functions
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 18:25:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201130162538.GK14465@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201130133129.1024662-8-djrscally@gmail.com>
Hi Daniel and Heikki,
Thank you for the patch.
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 01:31:18PM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote:
> From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
>
> From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
>
There seems to be one From: line too many. You can drop the one in the
commit message, git-format-patch will add it automatically.
> This implements the remaining .graph_* callbacks in the
> fwnode operations vector for the software nodes. That makes
s/vector/structure/ ?
> the fwnode_graph*() functions available in the drivers also
> when software nodes are used.
>
> The implementation tries to mimic the "OF graph" as much as
> possible, but there is no support for the "reg" device
> property. The ports will need to have the index in their
> name which starts with "port" (for example "port0", "port1",
> ...) and endpoints will use the index of the software node
> that is given to them during creation. The port nodes can
> also be grouped under a specially named "ports" subnode,
> just like in DT, if necessary.
I'm not very familiar with swnodes, but could we name ports port@n
instead of portn to mimic OF nodes ?
> The remote-endpoints are reference properties under the
> endpoint nodes that are named "remote-endpoint".
>
> Signed-off-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
> Co-developed-by: Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>
> ---
> changes since RFC v3:
> - Simplified software_node_get_next_endpoint() a little
> - Squared away references in software_node_get_next_endpoint()
> and swnode_graph_find_next_port(), since they were affected by
> the change to the earlier patch that had *get_next_child() also
> put the previous reference.
> - Dropped Andy's R-b, since the code changed.
> changes in RFC v3:
> - removed software_node_device_is_available
> - moved the change to software_node_get_next_child to a separate
> patch
> - switched to use fwnode_handle_put() in graph_get_next_endpoint()
> instead of software_node_put()
>
> changes in RFC v2:
> - added software_node_device_is_available
> - altered software_node_get_next_child to get references
> - altered software_node_get_next_endpoint to release references
> to ports and avoid passing invalid combinations of swnodes to
> software_node_get_next_child
> - altered swnode_graph_find_next_port to release port rather than
> old
>
> drivers/base/swnode.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 109 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/swnode.c b/drivers/base/swnode.c
> index 9bd0bb77ad5b..0c7a8d6b9ea8 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/swnode.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/swnode.c
> @@ -540,6 +540,110 @@ software_node_get_reference_args(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static struct fwnode_handle *
> +swnode_graph_find_next_port(const struct fwnode_handle *parent,
> + struct fwnode_handle *port)
> +{
> + struct fwnode_handle *old = port;
> +
> + while ((port = software_node_get_next_child(parent, old))) {
> + if (!strncmp(to_swnode(port)->node->name, "port", 4))
> + return port;
> + old = port;
> + }
> +
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> +static struct fwnode_handle *
> +software_node_graph_get_next_endpoint(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> + struct fwnode_handle *endpoint)
> +{
> + struct swnode *swnode = to_swnode(fwnode);
> + struct fwnode_handle *old = endpoint;
> + struct fwnode_handle *parent;
> + struct fwnode_handle *port;
> +
> + if (!swnode)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + if (endpoint) {
> + port = software_node_get_parent(endpoint);
> + parent = software_node_get_parent(port);
> + } else {
> + parent = software_node_get_named_child_node(fwnode, "ports");
> + if (!parent)
> + parent = software_node_get(&swnode->fwnode);
> +
> + port = swnode_graph_find_next_port(parent, NULL);
> + }
> +
> + for (; port; port = swnode_graph_find_next_port(parent, port)) {
> + endpoint = software_node_get_next_child(port, old);
> + if (endpoint) {
> + fwnode_handle_put(port);
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + /* No more endpoints for that port, so stop passing old */
> + old = NULL;
> + }
> +
> + fwnode_handle_put(parent);
> +
> + return endpoint;
> +}
> +
> +static struct fwnode_handle *
> +software_node_graph_get_remote_endpoint(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
> +{
> + struct swnode *swnode = to_swnode(fwnode);
> + const struct software_node_ref_args *ref;
> + const struct property_entry *prop;
> +
> + if (!swnode)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + prop = property_entry_get(swnode->node->properties, "remote-endpoint");
> + if (!prop || prop->type != DEV_PROP_REF || prop->is_inline)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + ref = prop->pointer;
> +
> + return software_node_get(software_node_fwnode(ref[0].node));
> +}
> +
> +static struct fwnode_handle *
> +software_node_graph_get_port_parent(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
> +{
> + struct swnode *swnode = to_swnode(fwnode);
> + struct fwnode_handle *parent;
> +
> + if (!strcmp(swnode->parent->node->name, "ports"))
> + parent = &swnode->parent->parent->fwnode;
> + else
> + parent = &swnode->parent->fwnode;
> +
> + return software_node_get(parent);
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +software_node_graph_parse_endpoint(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode,
> + struct fwnode_endpoint *endpoint)
> +{
> + struct swnode *swnode = to_swnode(fwnode);
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = kstrtou32(swnode->parent->node->name + 4, 10, &endpoint->port);
If we use port@, s/4/5/. But I suppose we also want to support the case
where a single port is used, with its name set to "port" ? The logic
would then need to be a tad more complex. Not sure if the consistency is
worth the additional complexity, up to you.
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + endpoint->id = swnode->id;
> + endpoint->local_fwnode = fwnode;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static const struct fwnode_operations software_node_ops = {
> .get = software_node_get,
> .put = software_node_put,
> @@ -551,7 +655,11 @@ static const struct fwnode_operations software_node_ops = {
> .get_parent = software_node_get_parent,
> .get_next_child_node = software_node_get_next_child,
> .get_named_child_node = software_node_get_named_child_node,
> - .get_reference_args = software_node_get_reference_args
> + .get_reference_args = software_node_get_reference_args,
> + .graph_get_next_endpoint = software_node_graph_get_next_endpoint,
> + .graph_get_remote_endpoint = software_node_graph_get_remote_endpoint,
> + .graph_get_port_parent = software_node_graph_get_port_parent,
> + .graph_parse_endpoint = software_node_graph_parse_endpoint,
> };
>
> /* -------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-30 16:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 144+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-30 13:31 [PATCH 00/18] Add functionality to ipu3-cio2 driver allowing software_node connections to sensors on platforms designed for Windows Daniel Scally
2020-11-30 13:31 ` [PATCH 01/18] property: Return true in fwnode_device_is_available for node types that do not implement this operation Daniel Scally
2020-11-30 16:05 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-11-30 17:21 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-12-01 3:12 ` Bingbu Cao
2020-12-01 8:46 ` Dan Scally
2020-11-30 13:31 ` [PATCH 02/18] property: Add support for calling fwnode_graph_get_endpoint_by_id() for fwnode->secondary Daniel Scally
2020-11-30 16:08 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-11-30 17:29 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-11-30 17:28 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-11-30 17:53 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-11-30 18:41 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-11-30 19:21 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-12-02 10:13 ` Dan Scally
2020-11-30 13:31 ` [PATCH 03/18] software_node: Fix failure to put() and get() references to children in software_node_get_next_child() Daniel Scally
2020-11-30 16:10 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-11-30 17:30 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-11-30 13:31 ` [PATCH 04/18] software_node: Enforce parent before child ordering of nodes array for software_node_register_nodes() Daniel Scally
2020-11-30 16:11 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-11-30 16:12 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-11-30 23:10 ` Dan Scally
2020-11-30 17:35 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-11-30 17:37 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-11-30 13:31 ` [PATCH 05/18] software_node: Alter software_node_unregister_nodes() to unregister the array in reverse order Daniel Scally
2020-11-30 16:14 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-11-30 17:45 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-12-01 23:36 ` Dan Scally
2020-11-30 13:31 ` [PATCH 06/18] software_node: amend software_node_unregister_node_group() to perform unregistration of array in reverse order to be consistent with software_node_unregister_nodes() Daniel Scally
2020-11-30 16:17 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-11-30 17:47 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-12-02 10:04 ` Dan Scally
2020-11-30 17:19 ` kernel test robot
2020-12-01 18:18 ` Dan Carpenter
2020-11-30 13:31 ` [PATCH 07/18] software_node: Add support for fwnode_graph*() family of functions Daniel Scally
2020-11-30 16:25 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2020-11-30 23:34 ` Dan Scally
2020-11-30 13:31 ` [PATCH 08/18] lib/test_printf.c: Use helper function to unwind array of software_nodes Daniel Scally
2020-11-30 15:54 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-11-30 16:26 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-11-30 13:31 ` [PATCH 09/18] ipu3-cio2: Add T: entry to MAINTAINERS Daniel Scally
2020-11-30 13:31 ` [PATCH 10/18] ipu3-cio2: Rename ipu3-cio2.c to allow module to be built from multiple source files retaining ipu3-cio2 name Daniel Scally
2020-12-01 6:56 ` Bingbu Cao
2020-12-01 7:07 ` Bingbu Cao
2020-11-30 13:31 ` [PATCH 11/18] media: v4l2-core: v4l2-async: Check possible match in match_fwnode based on sd->fwnode->secondary Daniel Scally
2020-11-30 16:27 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-11-30 17:55 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-11-30 13:31 ` [PATCH 12/18] acpi: Add acpi_dev_get_next_match_dev() and macro to iterate through acpi_devices matching a given _HID Daniel Scally
2020-11-30 17:58 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-11-30 13:31 ` [PATCH 13/18] ipu3-cio2: Add functionality allowing software_node connections to sensors on platforms designed for Windows Daniel Scally
2020-11-30 16:45 ` kernel test robot
2020-11-30 17:09 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-11-30 18:14 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-12-01 22:08 ` Dan Scally
2020-12-01 22:11 ` Dan Scally
2020-12-01 22:30 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-12-01 23:15 ` Dan Scally
2020-12-02 10:38 ` Sakari Ailus
2020-12-02 10:53 ` Dan Scally
2020-12-02 12:02 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-12-02 22:44 ` Dan Scally
2020-12-02 12:01 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-11-30 20:27 ` kernel test robot
2020-11-30 20:35 ` Sakari Ailus
2020-12-01 8:13 ` Dan Scally
2020-12-01 15:06 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-12-15 10:28 ` Daniel Scally
2020-12-15 10:32 ` Daniel Scally
2020-12-15 22:02 ` Sakari Ailus
2020-12-17 14:17 ` Daniel Scally
2020-11-30 13:31 ` [PATCH 14/18] acpi: utils: Add function to fetch dependent acpi_devices Daniel Scally
2020-11-30 18:23 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-11-30 18:40 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-11-30 23:54 ` Dan Scally
2020-12-01 15:10 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-12-01 15:23 ` Dan Scally
2020-11-30 13:31 ` [PATCH 15/18] i2c: i2c-core-acpi: Add i2c_acpi_dev_name() Daniel Scally
2020-11-30 17:11 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-12-02 22:44 ` Dan Scally
2020-11-30 13:31 ` [PATCH 16/18] i2c: i2c-core-base: Use the new i2c_acpi_dev_name() in i2c_set_dev_name() Daniel Scally
2020-11-30 17:12 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-11-30 19:18 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-12-02 9:35 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-12-02 9:49 ` Dan Scally
2020-12-01 23:50 ` Dan Scally
2020-11-30 13:31 ` [PATCH 17/18] gpio: gpiolib-acpi: Export acpi_get_gpiod() Daniel Scally
2020-11-30 17:02 ` kernel test robot
2020-11-30 18:04 ` kernel test robot
2020-11-30 19:20 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-11-30 13:31 ` [PATCH 18/18] ipu3: Add driver for dummy INT3472 ACPI device Daniel Scally
2020-11-30 16:17 ` Jean-Michel Hautbois
2020-11-30 23:20 ` Dan Scally
2020-12-01 18:31 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-12-01 18:36 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-12-01 18:51 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-11-30 16:29 ` Kieran Bingham
2020-11-30 17:21 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-11-30 20:07 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-11-30 23:32 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-12-01 15:55 ` Sakari Ailus
2020-12-01 18:37 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-12-02 11:09 ` Sakari Ailus
2020-12-02 12:42 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-12-02 15:08 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-12-03 12:37 ` Dan Scally
2020-12-03 12:57 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-12-01 18:49 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-12-01 20:59 ` Dan Scally
2020-12-02 9:39 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-12-02 12:35 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-12-02 15:11 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-12-03 12:25 ` Dan Scally
2020-12-13 22:48 ` Daniel Scally
2020-12-14 15:33 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-12-01 8:30 ` Dan Scally
2020-12-01 18:54 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-12-01 18:55 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-12-01 19:05 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-12-01 19:06 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-12-01 19:21 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-12-01 20:34 ` Hans de Goede
2020-12-01 20:46 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-12-02 12:48 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-12-02 15:15 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-12-01 21:05 ` Dan Scally
2020-12-02 9:42 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-01-07 23:55 ` Daniel Scally
2021-01-08 12:17 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-01-08 23:24 ` Daniel Scally
[not found] ` <CAHp75Vcy878xKUUUDH5ory9uS-Vhhx_W1PZc=S6hsSLYJ0i60w@mail.gmail.com>
2021-01-09 9:58 ` Daniel Scally
2021-01-09 0:18 ` Laurent Pinchart
2021-01-09 0:39 ` Daniel Scally
2020-11-30 20:52 ` Sakari Ailus
2020-11-30 23:06 ` Dan Scally
2020-11-30 23:21 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-12-01 0:05 ` Dan Scally
2020-12-01 6:44 ` Sakari Ailus
2020-12-01 8:08 ` Dan Scally
2020-12-01 8:09 ` Dan Scally
2020-12-01 12:32 ` Sakari Ailus
2020-12-01 12:40 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-12-01 12:44 ` Sakari Ailus
2020-12-01 12:48 ` Dan Scally
2020-12-01 19:01 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-12-01 18:55 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201130162538.GK14465@pendragon.ideasonboard.com \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
--cc=bingbu.cao@intel.com \
--cc=devel@acpica.org \
--cc=djrscally@gmail.com \
--cc=erik.kaneda@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jacopo+renesas@jmondi.org \
--cc=jorhand@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=kitakar@gmail.com \
--cc=laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=tian.shu.qiu@intel.com \
--cc=wsa@kernel.org \
--cc=yong.zhi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).