* [PATCH 5.10 0/2] 5.10.1-rc1 review
@ 2020-12-14 17:06 Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-12-14 17:06 ` [PATCH 5.10 1/2] Revert "md: change mddev chunk_sectors from int to unsigned" Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 more replies)
0 siblings, 6 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2020-12-14 17:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, stable
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.1 release.
There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Monday, 14 Dec 2020 18:04:42 +0000.
Anything received after that time might be too late.
The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.1-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
and the diffstat can be found below.
thanks,
greg k-h
-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Linux 5.10.1-rc1
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Revert "dm raid: fix discard limits for raid1 and raid10"
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Revert "md: change mddev 'chunk_sectors' from int to unsigned"
-------------
Diffstat:
Makefile | 4 ++--
drivers/md/dm-raid.c | 12 +++++-------
drivers/md/md.h | 4 ++--
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 5.10 1/2] Revert "md: change mddev chunk_sectors from int to unsigned"
2020-12-14 17:06 [PATCH 5.10 0/2] 5.10.1-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2020-12-14 17:06 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-12-14 17:06 ` [PATCH 5.10 2/2] Revert "dm raid: fix discard limits for raid1 and raid10" Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2020-12-14 17:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable, Dave Jones, Mike Snitzer, Song Liu,
Jens Axboe
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This reverts commit 6ffeb1c3f8226244c08105bcdbeecc04bad6b89a.
It causes problems :(
Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
Reported-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/md/md.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/md/md.h
+++ b/drivers/md/md.h
@@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ struct mddev {
int external; /* metadata is
* managed externally */
char metadata_type[17]; /* externally set*/
- unsigned int chunk_sectors;
+ int chunk_sectors;
time64_t ctime, utime;
int level, layout;
char clevel[16];
@@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ struct mddev {
*/
sector_t reshape_position;
int delta_disks, new_level, new_layout;
- unsigned int new_chunk_sectors;
+ int new_chunk_sectors;
int reshape_backwards;
struct md_thread *thread; /* management thread */
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 5.10 2/2] Revert "dm raid: fix discard limits for raid1 and raid10"
2020-12-14 17:06 [PATCH 5.10 0/2] 5.10.1-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-12-14 17:06 ` [PATCH 5.10 1/2] Revert "md: change mddev chunk_sectors from int to unsigned" Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2020-12-14 17:06 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-12-14 22:20 ` [PATCH 5.10 0/2] 5.10.1-rc1 review Shuah Khan
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2020-12-14 17:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman, stable, Dave Jones, Mike Snitzer,
Zdenek Kabelac, Mikulas Patocka
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This reverts commit e0910c8e4f87bb9f767e61a778b0d9271c4dc512.
It causes problems :(
Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
Reported-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@redhat.com>
Cc: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/md/dm-raid.c | 12 +++++-------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
@@ -3730,14 +3730,12 @@ static void raid_io_hints(struct dm_targ
blk_limits_io_opt(limits, chunk_size_bytes * mddev_data_stripes(rs));
/*
- * RAID10 personality requires bio splitting,
- * RAID0/1/4/5/6 don't and process large discard bios properly.
+ * RAID1 and RAID10 personalities require bio splitting,
+ * RAID0/4/5/6 don't and process large discard bios properly.
*/
- if (rs_is_raid10(rs)) {
- limits->discard_granularity = max(chunk_size_bytes,
- limits->discard_granularity);
- limits->max_discard_sectors = min_not_zero(rs->md.chunk_sectors,
- limits->max_discard_sectors);
+ if (rs_is_raid1(rs) || rs_is_raid10(rs)) {
+ limits->discard_granularity = chunk_size_bytes;
+ limits->max_discard_sectors = rs->md.chunk_sectors;
}
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 0/2] 5.10.1-rc1 review
2020-12-14 17:06 [PATCH 5.10 0/2] 5.10.1-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-12-14 17:06 ` [PATCH 5.10 1/2] Revert "md: change mddev chunk_sectors from int to unsigned" Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-12-14 17:06 ` [PATCH 5.10 2/2] Revert "dm raid: fix discard limits for raid1 and raid10" Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2020-12-14 22:20 ` Shuah Khan
2020-12-15 9:24 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-12-15 9:20 ` Jon Hunter
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2020-12-14 22:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-kernel
Cc: torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel,
stable, Shuah Khan
On 12/14/20 10:06 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.1 release.
> There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Monday, 14 Dec 2020 18:04:42 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.1-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 0/2] 5.10.1-rc1 review
2020-12-14 17:06 [PATCH 5.10 0/2] 5.10.1-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2020-12-14 22:20 ` [PATCH 5.10 0/2] 5.10.1-rc1 review Shuah Khan
@ 2020-12-15 9:20 ` Jon Hunter
2020-12-15 9:29 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-12-15 10:20 ` Naresh Kamboju
2020-12-15 20:32 ` Guenter Roeck
5 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jon Hunter @ 2020-12-15 9:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-kernel
Cc: torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, stable
Hi Greg,
On 14/12/2020 17:06, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.1 release.
> There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Monday, 14 Dec 2020 18:04:42 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.1-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Test results for stable-v5.10:
15 builds: 15 pass, 0 fail
26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail
64 tests: 63 pass, 1 fail
Linux version: 5.10.1-g841fca5a32cc
Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra20-ventana,
tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
tegra30-cardhu-a04
Test failures: tegra194-p2972-0000: boot.py
Some changes in v5.10 exposed a minor issue in the kernel that can cause
a blank line warning to be seen. The above test is failing due to this
blank warning. Thierry has posted a fix for this [0] and should be
merged for v5.11. It was not tagged for stable, but if you OK to pull
this in once in the mainline I can send a request. Otherwise all looks
good, so ...
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Cheers
Jon
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1336079/
--
nvpublic
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 0/2] 5.10.1-rc1 review
2020-12-14 22:20 ` [PATCH 5.10 0/2] 5.10.1-rc1 review Shuah Khan
@ 2020-12-15 9:24 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2020-12-15 9:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shuah Khan
Cc: linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage,
pavel, stable
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 03:20:38PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 12/14/20 10:06 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.1 release.
> > There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Monday, 14 Dec 2020 18:04:42 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.1-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> >
>
> Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
>
> Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Thanks for testing this one and letting me know!
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 0/2] 5.10.1-rc1 review
2020-12-15 9:20 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2020-12-15 9:29 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2020-12-15 9:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jon Hunter
Cc: linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage,
pavel, stable
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 09:20:26AM +0000, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On 14/12/2020 17:06, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.1 release.
> > There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Monday, 14 Dec 2020 18:04:42 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.1-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
>
> Test results for stable-v5.10:
> 15 builds: 15 pass, 0 fail
> 26 boots: 26 pass, 0 fail
> 64 tests: 63 pass, 1 fail
>
> Linux version: 5.10.1-g841fca5a32cc
> Boards tested: tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
> tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra20-ventana,
> tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
> tegra30-cardhu-a04
>
> Test failures: tegra194-p2972-0000: boot.py
>
>
> Some changes in v5.10 exposed a minor issue in the kernel that can cause
> a blank line warning to be seen. The above test is failing due to this
> blank warning. Thierry has posted a fix for this [0] and should be
> merged for v5.11. It was not tagged for stable, but if you OK to pull
> this in once in the mainline I can send a request. Otherwise all looks
> good, so ...
>
> Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Thanks for testing this, and yes, I'll be glad to take this once it hits
Linus's tree, just let me know the git commit id of it there.
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 0/2] 5.10.1-rc1 review
2020-12-14 17:06 [PATCH 5.10 0/2] 5.10.1-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2020-12-15 9:20 ` Jon Hunter
@ 2020-12-15 10:20 ` Naresh Kamboju
2020-12-15 10:27 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-12-15 20:32 ` Guenter Roeck
5 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2020-12-15 10:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: open list, Shuah Khan, patches, lkft-triage, linux-stable, pavel,
Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Guenter Roeck
On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 at 22:35, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.1 release.
> There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Monday, 14 Dec 2020 18:04:42 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.1-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
Summary
------------------------------------------------------------------------
kernel: 5.10.1
git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
git branch: linux-5.10.y
git commit: 841fca5a32cccd7d0123c0271f4350161ada5507
git describe: v5.10.1
Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.10.y/build/v5.10.1
No regressions (compared to build v5.10.1)
No fixes (compared to build v5.10.1)
Ran 56654 total tests in the following environments and test suites.
Environments
--------------
- arc
- arm
- arm64
- dragonboard-410c
- hi6220-hikey
- i386
- juno-r2
- juno-r2-compat
- juno-r2-kasan
- mips
- nxp-ls2088
- parisc
- powerpc
- qemu-arm-clang
- qemu-arm64-clang
- qemu-arm64-kasan
- qemu-i386-clang
- qemu-x86_64-clang
- qemu-x86_64-kasan
- qemu-x86_64-kcsan
- qemu_arm
- qemu_arm64
- qemu_arm64-compat
- qemu_i386
- qemu_x86_64
- qemu_x86_64-compat
- riscv
- s390
- sh
- sparc
- x15
- x86
- x86-kasan
Test Suites
-----------
* build
* linux-log-parser
* install-android-platform-tools-r2600
* kselftest
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* v4l2-compliance
* kvm-unit-tests
* libhugetlbfs
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* network-basic-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* perf
* fwts
* kunit
* rcutorture
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 0/2] 5.10.1-rc1 review
2020-12-15 10:20 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2020-12-15 10:27 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2020-12-15 10:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Naresh Kamboju
Cc: open list, Shuah Khan, patches, lkft-triage, linux-stable, pavel,
Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds, Guenter Roeck
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 03:50:57PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 at 22:35, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.1 release.
> > There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Monday, 14 Dec 2020 18:04:42 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.1-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
>
> Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
Thanks for testing this one!
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 0/2] 5.10.1-rc1 review
2020-12-14 17:06 [PATCH 5.10 0/2] 5.10.1-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2020-12-15 10:20 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2020-12-15 20:32 ` Guenter Roeck
2020-12-16 9:47 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
5 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2020-12-15 20:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, stable
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 06:06:09PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.1 release.
> There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Monday, 14 Dec 2020 18:04:42 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Build results:
total: 154 pass: 154 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 427 pass: 427 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.10 0/2] 5.10.1-rc1 review
2020-12-15 20:32 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2020-12-16 9:47 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2020-12-16 9:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Guenter Roeck
Cc: linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches, lkft-triage, pavel, stable
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 12:32:26PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 06:06:09PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.1 release.
> > There are 2 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Monday, 14 Dec 2020 18:04:42 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
>
> Build results:
> total: 154 pass: 154 fail: 0
> Qemu test results:
> total: 427 pass: 427 fail: 0
>
> Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Thanks for testing!
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-12-16 9:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-12-14 17:06 [PATCH 5.10 0/2] 5.10.1-rc1 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-12-14 17:06 ` [PATCH 5.10 1/2] Revert "md: change mddev chunk_sectors from int to unsigned" Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-12-14 17:06 ` [PATCH 5.10 2/2] Revert "dm raid: fix discard limits for raid1 and raid10" Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-12-14 22:20 ` [PATCH 5.10 0/2] 5.10.1-rc1 review Shuah Khan
2020-12-15 9:24 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-12-15 9:20 ` Jon Hunter
2020-12-15 9:29 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-12-15 10:20 ` Naresh Kamboju
2020-12-15 10:27 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-12-15 20:32 ` Guenter Roeck
2020-12-16 9:47 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).