* linux-next: manual merge of the ftrace tree with the bpf-next tree
@ 2021-04-20 4:14 Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2021-04-20 4:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Steven Rostedt, Daniel Borkmann, Alexei Starovoitov, Networking
Cc: Florent Revest, Ingo Molnar, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Linux Next Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 775 bytes --]
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the ftrace tree got a conflict in:
kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
between commit:
d9c9e4db186a ("bpf: Factorize bpf_trace_printk and bpf_seq_printf")
from the bpf-next tree and commit:
f2cc020d7876 ("tracing: Fix various typos in comments")
from the ftrace tree.
I fixed it up (the former removed the comment updated by the latter) and
can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next
is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may
also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2021-04-20 4:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-04-20 4:14 linux-next: manual merge of the ftrace tree with the bpf-next tree Stephen Rothwell
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).