From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
john.stultz@linaro.org, sboyd@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net,
Mark.Rutland@arm.com, maz@kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com,
neeraju@codeaurora.org, feng.tang@intel.com,
zhengjun.xing@intel.com, Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 clocksource 1/7] clocksource: Provide module parameters to inject delays in watchdog
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 09:00:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210426160008.GY1401198@tassilo.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210426152801.GY975577@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
> Boot-time coverage is important, as we saw in kbuild test robot testing
> of v9 of this patchset, which triggered clocksource_tsc_early, but not
> clocksource_tsc. Note that v10 avoids this triggering.
Not sure how that could happen, I didn't think the kbuild bot knows
how to set these options.
Overall I think you should follow the existing frame works instead
of inventing your own so that things can be later tested in an
uniform manner.
Perhaps the fault injection framework needs boot options, but
they should be generic.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-26 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-25 22:45 [PATCH v10 clocksource 0/7] Do not mark clocks unstable due to delays for v5.13 Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-25 22:47 ` [PATCH v10 clocksource 1/7] clocksource: Provide module parameters to inject delays in watchdog Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-26 4:07 ` Andi Kleen
2021-04-26 7:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-26 15:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-26 16:00 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2021-04-26 16:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-26 17:56 ` Andi Kleen
2021-04-26 18:24 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-28 4:49 ` Luming Yu
2021-04-28 13:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-28 14:24 ` Luming Yu
2021-04-28 14:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-25 22:47 ` [PATCH v10 clocksource 2/7] clocksource: Retry clock read if long delays detected Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-27 1:44 ` Feng Tang
2021-04-25 22:47 ` [PATCH v10 clocksource 3/7] clocksource: Check per-CPU clock synchronization when marked unstable Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-26 4:12 ` Andi Kleen
2021-04-26 7:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-25 22:47 ` [PATCH v10 clocksource 4/7] clocksource: Provide a module parameter to fuzz per-CPU clock checking Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-25 22:47 ` [PATCH v10 clocksource 5/7] clocksource: Limit number of CPUs checked for clock synchronization Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-25 22:47 ` [PATCH v10 clocksource 6/7] clocksource: Forgive tsc_early pre-calibration drift Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-26 15:01 ` Feng Tang
2021-04-26 15:25 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-26 15:36 ` Feng Tang
2021-04-26 18:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-27 1:13 ` Feng Tang
2021-04-27 3:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-27 4:16 ` Feng Tang
2021-04-26 15:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-27 21:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-27 7:27 ` [clocksource] 8c30ace35d: WARNING:at_kernel/time/clocksource.c:#clocksource_watchdog kernel test robot
2021-04-27 8:45 ` Feng Tang
2021-04-27 13:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-27 17:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-27 21:09 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-28 1:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-28 10:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-28 18:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-28 13:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-28 15:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-04-28 17:00 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-29 7:38 ` Feng Tang
2021-04-28 18:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-29 8:27 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-29 14:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-29 17:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-29 23:04 ` Andi Kleen
2021-04-30 0:24 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-30 0:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-30 5:08 ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-25 22:47 ` [PATCH v9 clocksource 6/6] clocksource: Reduce WATCHDOG_THRESHOLD Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-25 22:47 ` [PATCH v10 clocksource 7/7] " Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210426160008.GY1401198@tassilo.jf.intel.com \
--to=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Mark.Rutland@arm.com \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=neeraju@codeaurora.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=zhengjun.xing@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).