linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
	bristot@redhat.com, vschneid@redhat.com, gautham.shenoy@amd.com,
	kprateek.nayak@amd.com, aaron.lu@intel.com, clm@meta.com,
	tj@kernel.org, roman.gushchin@linux.dev, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/7] sched: Move is_cpu_allowed() into sched.h
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 15:03:37 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230710200342.358255-3-void@manifault.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230710200342.358255-1-void@manifault.com>

is_cpu_allowed() exists as a static inline function in core.c. The
functionality offered by is_cpu_allowed() is useful to scheduling
policies as well, e.g. to determine whether a runnable task can be
migrated to another core that would otherwise go idle.

Let's move it to sched.h.

Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c  | 31 -------------------------------
 kernel/sched/sched.h | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 167cd9f11ed0..1451f5aa82ac 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -48,7 +48,6 @@
 #include <linux/kcov.h>
 #include <linux/kprobes.h>
 #include <linux/llist_api.h>
-#include <linux/mmu_context.h>
 #include <linux/mmzone.h>
 #include <linux/mutex_api.h>
 #include <linux/nmi.h>
@@ -2444,36 +2443,6 @@ static inline bool rq_has_pinned_tasks(struct rq *rq)
 	return rq->nr_pinned;
 }
 
-/*
- * Per-CPU kthreads are allowed to run on !active && online CPUs, see
- * __set_cpus_allowed_ptr() and select_fallback_rq().
- */
-static inline bool is_cpu_allowed(struct task_struct *p, int cpu)
-{
-	/* When not in the task's cpumask, no point in looking further. */
-	if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, p->cpus_ptr))
-		return false;
-
-	/* migrate_disabled() must be allowed to finish. */
-	if (is_migration_disabled(p))
-		return cpu_online(cpu);
-
-	/* Non kernel threads are not allowed during either online or offline. */
-	if (!(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD))
-		return cpu_active(cpu) && task_cpu_possible(cpu, p);
-
-	/* KTHREAD_IS_PER_CPU is always allowed. */
-	if (kthread_is_per_cpu(p))
-		return cpu_online(cpu);
-
-	/* Regular kernel threads don't get to stay during offline. */
-	if (cpu_dying(cpu))
-		return false;
-
-	/* But are allowed during online. */
-	return cpu_online(cpu);
-}
-
 /*
  * This is how migration works:
  *
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index 94846c947d6e..187ad5da5ef6 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
 #include <linux/lockdep.h>
 #include <linux/minmax.h>
 #include <linux/mm.h>
+#include <linux/mmu_context.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/mutex_api.h>
 #include <linux/plist.h>
@@ -1199,6 +1200,36 @@ static inline bool is_migration_disabled(struct task_struct *p)
 #endif
 }
 
+/*
+ * Per-CPU kthreads are allowed to run on !active && online CPUs, see
+ * __set_cpus_allowed_ptr() and select_fallback_rq().
+ */
+static inline bool is_cpu_allowed(struct task_struct *p, int cpu)
+{
+	/* When not in the task's cpumask, no point in looking further. */
+	if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, p->cpus_ptr))
+		return false;
+
+	/* migrate_disabled() must be allowed to finish. */
+	if (is_migration_disabled(p))
+		return cpu_online(cpu);
+
+	/* Non kernel threads are not allowed during either online or offline. */
+	if (!(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD))
+		return cpu_active(cpu) && task_cpu_possible(cpu, p);
+
+	/* KTHREAD_IS_PER_CPU is always allowed. */
+	if (kthread_is_per_cpu(p))
+		return cpu_online(cpu);
+
+	/* Regular kernel threads don't get to stay during offline. */
+	if (cpu_dying(cpu))
+		return false;
+
+	/* But are allowed during online. */
+	return cpu_online(cpu);
+}
+
 DECLARE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(struct rq, runqueues);
 
 #define cpu_rq(cpu)		(&per_cpu(runqueues, (cpu)))
-- 
2.40.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-07-10 20:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-10 20:03 [PATCH v2 0/7] sched: Implement shared runqueue in CFS David Vernet
2023-07-10 20:03 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] sched: Expose move_queued_task() from core.c David Vernet
2023-07-10 20:03 ` David Vernet [this message]
2023-07-10 20:03 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] sched: Check cpu_active() earlier in newidle_balance() David Vernet
2023-07-10 20:03 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] sched/fair: Add SHARED_RUNQ sched feature and skeleton calls David Vernet
2023-07-11  9:45   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-11 16:19     ` David Vernet
2023-07-12  8:39   ` Abel Wu
2023-07-12 21:34     ` David Vernet
2023-07-10 20:03 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] sched: Implement shared runqueue in CFS David Vernet
2023-07-11 10:18   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-11 16:26     ` David Vernet
2023-07-12  6:00   ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2023-07-12 19:13     ` David Vernet
2023-07-12 10:47   ` Abel Wu
2023-07-12 22:16     ` David Vernet
2023-07-13  3:43       ` Abel Wu
2023-07-13  4:05         ` David Vernet
2023-07-13  7:58   ` Aaron Lu
2023-07-13  8:29   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-10 20:03 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] sched: Shard per-LLC shared runqueues David Vernet
2023-07-11 10:49   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-11 19:57     ` David Vernet
2023-07-12 10:06       ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2023-07-12 12:22         ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-10 20:03 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] sched: Move shared_runq to __{enqueue,dequeue}_entity() David Vernet
2023-07-11 10:51   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-11 16:30     ` David Vernet
2023-07-11 11:42 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] sched: Implement shared runqueue in CFS Peter Zijlstra
2023-07-11 21:33   ` David Vernet
2023-07-21  9:12 ` Gautham R. Shenoy
2023-07-25 20:22   ` David Vernet
2023-08-02  6:32     ` Gautham R. Shenoy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230710200342.358255-3-void@manifault.com \
    --to=void@manifault.com \
    --cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=clm@meta.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).