From: Vitalii Bursov <vitaly@bursov.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vitalii Bursov <vitaly@bursov.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/1] sched/fair: allow disabling newidle_balance with sched_relax_domain_level
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 02:47:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1711584739.git.vitaly@bursov.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20240328004738.DhfLagcoOWIFY3BYMJMt-KrcWu0dKNz-0ei9jvEvTVg@z> (raw)
Hi,
During the upgrade from Linux 5.4 we found a small (around 3%)
performance regression which was tracked to commit
c5b0a7eefc70150caf23e37bc9d639c68c87a097
sched/fair: Remove sysctl_sched_migration_cost condition
With a default value of 500us, sysctl_sched_migration_cost is
significanlty higher than the cost of load_balance. Remove the
condition and rely on the sd->max_newidle_lb_cost to abort
newidle_balance.
Looks like "newidle" balancing is beneficial for a lot of workloads,
just not for this specific one. The workload is video encoding, there
are 100s-1000s of threads, some are synchonized with mutexes and
conditional variables. The process aims to have a portion of CPU idle,
so no CPU cores are 100% busy. Perhaps, the performance impact we see
comes from additional processing in the scheduler and additional cost
like more cache misses, and not from an incorrect balancing. See
perf output below.
My understanding is that "sched_relax_domain_level" cgroup parameter
should control if newidle_balance() is called and what's the scope
of the balancing is, but it doesn't fully work for this case.
cpusets.rst documentation:
> The 'cpuset.sched_relax_domain_level' file allows you to request changing
> this searching range as you like. This file takes int value which
> indicates size of searching range in levels ideally as follows,
> otherwise initial value -1 that indicates the cpuset has no request.
>
> ====== ===========================================================
> -1 no request. use system default or follow request of others.
> 0 no search.
> 1 search siblings (hyperthreads in a core).
> 2 search cores in a package.
> 3 search cpus in a node [= system wide on non-NUMA system]
> 4 search nodes in a chunk of node [on NUMA system]
> 5 search system wide [on NUMA system]
> ====== ===========================================================
Setting cpuset.sched_relax_domain_level to 0 works as 1.
On a dual-CPU server, domains and levels are as follows:
domain 0: level 0, SMT
domain 1: level 2, MC
domain 2: level 5, NUMA
So, to support "0 no search", the value in
cpuset.sched_relax_domain_level should disable SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE for a
specified level and keep it enabled for prior levels. For example, SMT
level is 0, so sched_relax_domain_level=0 should exclude levels >=0.
Instead, cpuset.sched_relax_domain_level enables the specified level,
which effectively removes "no search" option. See below for domain
flags for all cpuset.sched_relax_domain_level values.
Proposed patch allows clearing SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE flags when
cpuset.sched_relax_domain_level is set to 0 and extends max
value validation range beyond sched_domain_level_max. This allows
setting SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE on all levels and override platform
default if it does not include all levels.
Thanks
=========================
Perf output for a simimar workload/test case shows that newidle_balance
is called when handling futex and nanosleep syscalls:
8.74% 0.40% a.out [kernel.vmlinux] [k] entry_SYSCALL_64
8.34% entry_SYSCALL_64
- do_syscall_64
- 5.50% __x64_sys_futex
- 5.42% do_futex
- 3.79% futex_wait
- 3.74% __futex_wait
- 3.53% futex_wait_queue
- 3.45% schedule
- 3.43% __schedule
- 2.06% pick_next_task
- 1.93% pick_next_task_fair
- 1.87% newidle_balance
- 1.52% load_balance
- 1.16% find_busiest_group
- 1.13% update_sd_lb_stats.constprop.0
1.01% update_sg_lb_stats
- 0.83% dequeue_task_fair
0.66% dequeue_entity
- 1.57% futex_wake
- 1.22% wake_up_q
- 1.20% try_to_wake_up
0.58% select_task_rq_fair
- 2.44% __x64_sys_nanosleep
- 2.36% hrtimer_nanosleep
- 2.33% do_nanosleep
- 2.05% schedule
- 2.03% __schedule
- 1.23% pick_next_task
- 1.15% pick_next_task_fair
- 1.12% newidle_balance
- 0.90% load_balance
- 0.68% find_busiest_group
- 0.66% update_sd_lb_stats.constprop.0
0.59% update_sg_lb_stats
0.52% dequeue_task_fair
When newidle_balance is disabled (or when using older kernels), perf
output is:
6.37% 0.41% a.out [kernel.vmlinux] [k] entry_SYSCALL_64
5.96% entry_SYSCALL_64
- do_syscall_64
- 3.97% __x64_sys_futex
- 3.89% do_futex
- 2.32% futex_wait
- 2.27% __futex_wait
- 2.05% futex_wait_queue
- 1.98% schedule
- 1.96% __schedule
- 0.81% dequeue_task_fair
0.66% dequeue_entity
- 0.64% pick_next_task
0.51% pick_next_task_fair
- 1.52% futex_wake
- 1.15% wake_up_q
- try_to_wake_up
0.59% select_task_rq_fair
- 1.58% __x64_sys_nanosleep
- 1.52% hrtimer_nanosleep
- 1.48% do_nanosleep
- 1.20% schedule
- 1.19% __schedule
0.53% dequeue_task_fair
Without a patch:
=========================
CPUs: 2 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz
# uname -r
6.8.1
# numactl -H
available: 2 nodes (0-1)
node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
node 0 size: 63962 MB
node 0 free: 59961 MB
node 1 cpus: 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47
node 1 size: 64446 MB
node 1 free: 63338 MB
node distances:
node 0 1
0: 10 21
1: 21 10
# head /proc/schedstat
version 15
timestamp 4295347219
cpu0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3035466036 858375615 67578
domain0 0000,01000001 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0...
domain1 000f,ff000fff 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0...
domain2 ffff,ffffffff 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0...
# cd /sys/kernel/debug/sched/domains
# echo -1 > /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/cpuset.sched_relax_domain_level
# grep . cpu0/*/{name,flags,groups_flags,max_newidle_lb_cost}
cpu0/domain0/name:SMT
cpu0/domain1/name:MC
cpu0/domain2/name:NUMA
cpu0/domain0/flags:SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC SD_BALANCE_FORK
SD_WAKE_AFFINE SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY
SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES SD_PREFER_SIBLING
cpu0/domain1/flags:SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC SD_BALANCE_FORK
SD_WAKE_AFFINE SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES
SD_PREFER_SIBLING
cpu0/domain2/flags:SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC SD_BALANCE_FORK
SD_WAKE_AFFINE SD_SERIALIZE SD_OVERLAP
SD_NUMA
cpu0/domain1/groups_flags:SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC
SD_BALANCE_FORK SD_WAKE_AFFINE
SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES
SD_PREFER_SIBLING
cpu0/domain2/groups_flags:SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC
SD_BALANCE_FORK SD_WAKE_AFFINE
SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES SD_PREFER_SIBLING
cpu0/domain0/max_newidle_lb_cost:2236
cpu0/domain1/max_newidle_lb_cost:3444
cpu0/domain2/max_newidle_lb_cost:4590
# echo 0 > /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/cpuset.sched_relax_domain_level
# grep . cpu0/*/{flags,groups_flags,max_newidle_lb_cost}
cpu0/domain0/flags:SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC SD_BALANCE_FORK
SD_WAKE_AFFINE SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY
SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES SD_PREFER_SIBLING
cpu0/domain1/flags:SD_BALANCE_EXEC SD_BALANCE_FORK SD_WAKE_AFFINE
SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES SD_PREFER_SIBLING
cpu0/domain2/flags:SD_BALANCE_EXEC SD_BALANCE_FORK SD_WAKE_AFFINE
SD_SERIALIZE SD_OVERLAP SD_NUMA
cpu0/domain1/groups_flags:SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC
SD_BALANCE_FORK SD_WAKE_AFFINE
SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES
SD_PREFER_SIBLING
cpu0/domain2/groups_flags:SD_BALANCE_EXEC SD_BALANCE_FORK
SD_WAKE_AFFINE SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES
SD_PREFER_SIBLING
cpu0/domain0/max_newidle_lb_cost:0
cpu0/domain1/max_newidle_lb_cost:0
cpu0/domain2/max_newidle_lb_cost:0
# echo 1 > /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/cpuset.sched_relax_domain_level
# grep . cpu0/*/{flags,groups_flags,max_newidle_lb_cost}
cpu0/domain0/flags:SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC SD_BALANCE_FORK
SD_WAKE_AFFINE SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY
SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES SD_PREFER_SIBLING
cpu0/domain1/flags:SD_BALANCE_EXEC SD_BALANCE_FORK SD_WAKE_AFFINE
SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES SD_PREFER_SIBLING
cpu0/domain2/flags:SD_BALANCE_EXEC SD_BALANCE_FORK SD_WAKE_AFFINE
SD_SERIALIZE SD_OVERLAP SD_NUMA
cpu0/domain1/groups_flags:SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC
SD_BALANCE_FORK SD_WAKE_AFFINE
SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES
SD_PREFER_SIBLING
cpu0/domain2/groups_flags:SD_BALANCE_EXEC SD_BALANCE_FORK
SD_WAKE_AFFINE SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES
SD_PREFER_SIBLING
cpu0/domain0/max_newidle_lb_cost:309
cpu0/domain1/max_newidle_lb_cost:0
cpu0/domain2/max_newidle_lb_cost:0
# echo 2 > /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/cpuset.sched_relax_domain_level
# grep . cpu0/*/{flags,groups_flags,max_newidle_lb_cost}
cpu0/domain0/flags:SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC SD_BALANCE_FORK
SD_WAKE_AFFINE SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY
SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES SD_PREFER_SIBLING
cpu0/domain1/flags:SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC SD_BALANCE_FORK
SD_WAKE_AFFINE SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES
SD_PREFER_SIBLING
cpu0/domain2/flags:SD_BALANCE_EXEC SD_BALANCE_FORK SD_WAKE_AFFINE
SD_SERIALIZE SD_OVERLAP SD_NUMA
cpu0/domain1/groups_flags:SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC
SD_BALANCE_FORK SD_WAKE_AFFINE
SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES
SD_PREFER_SIBLING
cpu0/domain2/groups_flags:SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC
SD_BALANCE_FORK SD_WAKE_AFFINE
SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES SD_PREFER_SIBLING
cpu0/domain0/max_newidle_lb_cost:276
cpu0/domain1/max_newidle_lb_cost:2776
cpu0/domain2/max_newidle_lb_cost:0
# echo 3 > /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/cpuset.sched_relax_domain_level
# grep . cpu0/*/{flags,groups_flags,max_newidle_lb_cost}
cpu0/domain0/flags:SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC SD_BALANCE_FORK
SD_WAKE_AFFINE SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY
SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES SD_PREFER_SIBLING
cpu0/domain1/flags:SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC SD_BALANCE_FORK
SD_WAKE_AFFINE SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES
SD_PREFER_SIBLING
cpu0/domain2/flags:SD_BALANCE_EXEC SD_BALANCE_FORK SD_WAKE_AFFINE
SD_SERIALIZE SD_OVERLAP SD_NUMA
cpu0/domain1/groups_flags:SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC
SD_BALANCE_FORK SD_WAKE_AFFINE
SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES
SD_PREFER_SIBLING
cpu0/domain2/groups_flags:SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC
SD_BALANCE_FORK SD_WAKE_AFFINE
SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES SD_PREFER_SIBLING
cpu0/domain0/max_newidle_lb_cost:289
cpu0/domain1/max_newidle_lb_cost:3192
cpu0/domain2/max_newidle_lb_cost:0
# echo 4 > /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/cpuset.sched_relax_domain_level
# grep . cpu0/*/{flags,groups_flags,max_newidle_lb_cost}
cpu0/domain0/flags:SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC SD_BALANCE_FORK
SD_WAKE_AFFINE SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY
SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES SD_PREFER_SIBLING
cpu0/domain1/flags:SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC SD_BALANCE_FORK
SD_WAKE_AFFINE SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES
SD_PREFER_SIBLING
cpu0/domain2/flags:SD_BALANCE_EXEC SD_BALANCE_FORK SD_WAKE_AFFINE
SD_SERIALIZE SD_OVERLAP SD_NUMA
cpu0/domain1/groups_flags:SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC
SD_BALANCE_FORK SD_WAKE_AFFINE
SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES
SD_PREFER_SIBLING
cpu0/domain2/groups_flags:SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC
SD_BALANCE_FORK SD_WAKE_AFFINE
SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES SD_PREFER_SIBLING
cpu0/domain0/max_newidle_lb_cost:1306
cpu0/domain1/max_newidle_lb_cost:1999
cpu0/domain2/max_newidle_lb_cost:0
# echo 5 > /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/cpuset.sched_relax_domain_level
bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument
=========================
The same system with the patch applied:
=========================
# cd /sys/kernel/debug/sched/domains
# echo -1 > /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/cpuset.sched_relax_domain_level
# grep . cpu0/*/{name,level,flags,groups_flags}
cpu0/domain0/name:SMT
cpu0/domain1/name:MC
cpu0/domain2/name:NUMA
cpu0/domain0/level:0
cpu0/domain1/level:2
cpu0/domain2/level:5
cpu0/domain0/flags:SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC ...
cpu0/domain1/flags:SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC ...
cpu0/domain2/flags:SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC ...
cpu0/domain1/groups_flags:SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC ...
cpu0/domain2/groups_flags:SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC ...
# echo 0 > /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/cpuset.sched_relax_domain_level
# grep . cpu0/*/{flags,groups_flags}
cpu0/domain0/flags:SD_BALANCE_EXEC ...
cpu0/domain1/flags:SD_BALANCE_EXEC ...
cpu0/domain2/flags:SD_BALANCE_EXEC ...
cpu0/domain1/groups_flags:SD_BALANCE_EXEC ...
cpu0/domain2/groups_flags:SD_BALANCE_EXEC ...
# echo 1 > /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/cpuset.sched_relax_domain_level
# grep . cpu0/*/{flags,groups_flags}
cpu0/domain0/flags:SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC ...
cpu0/domain1/flags:SD_BALANCE_EXEC ...
cpu0/domain2/flags:SD_BALANCE_EXEC ...
cpu0/domain1/groups_flags:SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC ...
cpu0/domain2/groups_flags:SD_BALANCE_EXEC ...
[skip 2, same as 1]
# echo 3 > /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/cpuset.sched_relax_domain_level
# grep . cpu0/*/{flags,groups_flags}
cpu0/domain0/flags:SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC ...
cpu0/domain1/flags:SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC ...
cpu0/domain2/flags:SD_BALANCE_EXEC ...
cpu0/domain1/groups_flags:SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC ...
cpu0/domain2/groups_flags:SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC ...
[skip 4 and 5, same as 3]
# echo 6 > /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/cpuset.sched_relax_domain_level
# grep . cpu0/*/{flags,groups_flags}
cpu0/domain0/flags:SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC ...
cpu0/domain1/flags:SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC ...
cpu0/domain2/flags:SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC ...
cpu0/domain1/groups_flags:SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC ...
cpu0/domain2/groups_flags:SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE SD_BALANCE_EXEC ...
# echo 7 > /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset/cpuset.sched_relax_domain_level
bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument
=========================
Vitalii Bursov (1):
sched/fair: allow disabling newidle_balance with
sched_relax_domain_level
kernel/cgroup/cpuset.c | 2 +-
kernel/sched/debug.c | 1 +
kernel/sched/topology.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--
2.20.1
next reply other threads:[~2024-03-28 0:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-28 0:30 Vitalii Bursov [this message]
2024-03-28 0:30 ` [PATCH 1/1] sched/fair: allow disabling newidle_balance with sched_relax_domain_level Vitalii Bursov
2024-03-28 5:51 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2024-03-28 16:19 ` Vitalii Bursov
2024-03-28 14:43 ` Vincent Guittot
2024-03-28 16:27 ` Vitalii Bursov
2024-03-28 16:48 ` Vincent Guittot
2024-03-28 17:10 ` Vitalii Bursov
2024-03-28 17:38 ` Vincent Guittot
2024-03-28 0:47 ` [PATCH 0/1] " Vitalii Bursov
2024-03-28 5:48 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2024-03-28 16:17 ` Vitalii Bursov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1711584739.git.vitaly@bursov.com \
--to=vitaly@bursov.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).