linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [rfc/patch] mm/slub: restore/expand unfreeze_partials() local exclusion scope
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 23:26:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <26c181c9-ec48-09e2-2d73-6fc769a19c76@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e3470ab357b48bccfbd1f5133b982178a7d2befb.camel@gmx.de>

On 7/26/21 7:00 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Sun, 2021-07-25 at 21:34 +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> On 7/25/21 9:12 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>>> +       /*
>>> +        * On !RT we just want to disable preemption, on RT we need
>>> the lock
>>> +        * for real. This happens to match local_lock() semantics.
>>> +        */
>>> +       local_lock(&s->cpu_slab->lock);
>>
>> OK I realized (and tglx confirmed) that this will blow up on !RT +
>> lockdep if interrupted by ___slab_alloc() that will do
>> local_lock_irqsave(). So back to #ifdefs it is. But should work as-is
>> for RT testing.
> 
> Speaking of that local_lock_irqsave(), and some unloved ifdefs..
> 
> Why not do something like the below?  When I look at new_slab:, I see
> cpu_slab->partial assignment protected by IRQs being disabled, which
> implies to me it should probably be so protected everywhere.  There
> used to be another slub_set_percpu_partial() call in
> unfreeze_partials(), which was indeed called with IRQs disabled, quite
> sane looking to an mm outsider looking in. The odd man out ->partial
> assignment was the preempt disabled put_cpu_partial() cmpxchg loop,
> which contained an IRQ disabled region to accommodate the
> aforementioned unfreeze_partials().
> 
> Is there real world benefit to the cmpxchg loops whacked below (ala
> monkey see monkey do) over everyone just taking the straight shot you
> laid down for RT?  It's easier on the eye (mine anyway), and neither
> PREEMPT or PREEMPT_RT seem inclined to complain... tick... tock...

Yep, sounds like a good approach, thanks. Percpu partial is not *the*
SLUB fast path, so it should be sufficient without the lockless cmpxchg
tricks. Will incorporate in updated series.

> 
> ---
>  mm/slub.c |   79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/mm/slub.c
> +++ b/mm/slub.c
> @@ -2437,13 +2437,12 @@ static void __unfreeze_partials(struct k
>  static void unfreeze_partials(struct kmem_cache *s)
>  {
>  	struct page *partial_page;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> 
> -	do {
> -		partial_page = this_cpu_read(s->cpu_slab->partial);
> -
> -	} while (partial_page &&
> -		 this_cpu_cmpxchg(s->cpu_slab->partial, partial_page, NULL)
> -				  != partial_page);
> +	local_lock_irqsave(&s->cpu_slab->lock, flags);
> +	partial_page = this_cpu_read(s->cpu_slab->partial);
> +	this_cpu_write(s->cpu_slab->partial, NULL);
> +	local_unlock_irqrestore(&s->cpu_slab->lock, flags);
> 
>  	if (partial_page)
>  		__unfreeze_partials(s, partial_page);
> @@ -2480,41 +2479,45 @@ static void put_cpu_partial(struct kmem_
>  {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL
>  	struct page *oldpage;
> -	int pages;
> -	int pobjects;
> -
> -	slub_get_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_slab);
> -	do {
> -		pages = 0;
> -		pobjects = 0;
> -		oldpage = this_cpu_read(s->cpu_slab->partial);
> -
> -		if (oldpage) {
> -			pobjects = oldpage->pobjects;
> -			pages = oldpage->pages;
> -			if (drain && pobjects > slub_cpu_partial(s)) {
> -				/*
> -				 * partial array is full. Move the existing
> -				 * set to the per node partial list.
> -				 */
> -				unfreeze_partials(s);
> -				oldpage = NULL;
> -				pobjects = 0;
> -				pages = 0;
> -				stat(s, CPU_PARTIAL_DRAIN);
> -			}
> +	struct page *page_to_unfreeze = NULL;
> +	unsigned long flags;
> +	int pages = 0, pobjects = 0;
> +
> +	local_lock_irqsave(&s->cpu_slab->lock, flags);
> +
> +	if (oldpage = this_cpu_read(s->cpu_slab->partial)) {
> +		pobjects = oldpage->pobjects;
> +		pages = oldpage->pages;
> +		if (drain && pobjects > slub_cpu_partial(s)) {
> +			/*
> +			 * partial array is full. Move the existing
> +			 * set to the per node partial list.
> +			 *
> +			 * Postpone unfreezing until we drop the local
> +			 * lock to avoid an RT unlock/relock requirement
> +			 * due to MEMCG __slab_free() recursion.
> +			 */
> +			page_to_unfreeze = oldpage;
> +
> +			oldpage = NULL;
> +			pobjects = 0;
> +			pages = 0;
> +			stat(s, CPU_PARTIAL_DRAIN);
>  		}
> +	}
> +
> +	pages++;
> +	pobjects += page->objects - page->inuse;
> +
> +	page->pages = pages;
> +	page->pobjects = pobjects;
> +	page->next = oldpage;
> 
> -		pages++;
> -		pobjects += page->objects - page->inuse;
> +	this_cpu_write(s->cpu_slab->partial, page);
> +	local_unlock_irqrestore(&s->cpu_slab->lock, flags);
> 
> -		page->pages = pages;
> -		page->pobjects = pobjects;
> -		page->next = oldpage;
> -
> -	} while (this_cpu_cmpxchg(s->cpu_slab->partial, oldpage, page)
> -								!= oldpage);
> -	slub_put_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_slab);
> +	if (page_to_unfreeze)
> +		__unfreeze_partials(s, page_to_unfreeze);
>  #endif	/* CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL */
>  }
> 
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-26 21:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-08  9:42 [ANNOUNCE] v5.13-rt1 Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-09  5:20 ` [patch] mm/slub: Fix kmem_cache_alloc_bulk() error path Mike Galbraith
2021-07-09  5:20 ` [patch] mm/slub: Replace do_slab_free() local_lock_irqsave/restore() calls in PREEMPT_RT scope Mike Galbraith
2021-07-09  5:21 ` [rfc/patch] mm/slub: restore/expand unfreeze_partials() local exclusion scope Mike Galbraith
2021-07-09  5:25   ` Mike Galbraith
2021-07-09 19:28   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-10  1:12     ` Mike Galbraith
2021-07-15 16:34       ` Mike Galbraith
2021-07-17 14:58         ` [patch] v2 " Mike Galbraith
2021-07-18  7:58           ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-07-18  8:11             ` Mike Galbraith
2021-07-18 15:43           ` Mike Galbraith
2021-07-18 21:19           ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-07-19  4:01             ` Mike Galbraith
2021-07-19 13:15               ` Mike Galbraith
2021-07-20  2:46           ` kernel test robot
2021-07-20  8:56         ` [rfc/patch] " Vlastimil Babka
2021-07-20 11:26           ` Mike Galbraith
2021-07-21  4:56             ` Mike Galbraith
2021-07-21  8:44               ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-07-21  9:33                 ` Mike Galbraith
2021-07-23 22:39                   ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-07-24  2:25                     ` Mike Galbraith
2021-07-25 14:09                     ` Mike Galbraith
2021-07-25 14:16                       ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-07-25 15:02                         ` Mike Galbraith
2021-07-25 16:27                           ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-07-25 19:12                             ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-07-25 19:34                               ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-07-26 10:04                                 ` Mike Galbraith
2021-07-26 17:00                                 ` Mike Galbraith
2021-07-26 21:26                                   ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2021-07-27  4:09                                     ` Mike Galbraith
2021-07-28 16:59                                       ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-07-29  4:51                                         ` Mike Galbraith
2021-07-29  9:51                                           ` Vlastimil Babka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=26c181c9-ec48-09e2-2d73-6fc769a19c76@suse.cz \
    --to=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).