linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [rfc/patch] mm/slub: restore/expand unfreeze_partials() local exclusion scope
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2021 21:12:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <73f032c2-70f1-77b6-9fd2-9aca52fd5b4d@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18ca0ce9-3407-61e1-31d6-5c48e80eb5bb@suse.cz>

On 7/25/21 6:27 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>>> Hope fixing that helps then?
>>
>> Yeah, though RT should perhaps be pinned across release/re-acquire?
> 
> Probably not necessary, this_cpu_cmpxchg() will effectively recognize
> being moved to a different CPU.
> Might also move __unfreeze_partials() out of the whole loop to avoid the
> relock. Yeah that should be better.
> 
>> Actually, local locks should rediscover the recursion handling skills
>> they long had so such RT specific hole poking isn't necessary.  There
>> previously would have been no ifdef+typo there for eyeballs to miss and
>> miss and miss.
> 
> Hm, now I'm realizing that local_lock() on !RT is just
> preempt_disable(), i.e. equivalent to get_cpu_ptr(), so some of the
> ifdeffery could go away?

How much will this explode? Thanks.

----8<----
From 99808b198bdf867951131bb9d1ca1bd1cd12b8c4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 23:17:18 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] PREEMPT_RT+SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL fix attempt

---
 mm/slub.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 581004a5aca9..d12a50b5ee6f 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -2437,13 +2437,19 @@ static void unfreeze_partials(struct kmem_cache *s)
 {
 	struct page *partial_page;
 
+#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
 	do {
 		partial_page = this_cpu_read(s->cpu_slab->partial);
 
 	} while (partial_page &&
 		 this_cpu_cmpxchg(s->cpu_slab->partial, partial_page, NULL)
 				  != partial_page);
-
+#else
+	local_lock(&s->cpu_slab->lock);
+	partial_page = this_cpu_read(s->cpu_slab->partial);
+	this_cpu_write(s->cpu_slab->partial, NULL);
+	local_unlock(&s->cpu_slab->lock);
+#endif
 	if (partial_page)
 		__unfreeze_partials(s, partial_page);
 }
@@ -2479,10 +2485,15 @@ static void put_cpu_partial(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page, int drain)
 {
 #ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL
 	struct page *oldpage;
+	struct page *page_to_unfreeze = NULL;
 	int pages;
 	int pobjects;
 
-	slub_get_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_slab);
+	/*
+	 * On !RT we just want to disable preemption, on RT we need the lock
+	 * for real. This happens to match local_lock() semantics.
+	 */
+	local_lock(&s->cpu_slab->lock);
 	do {
 		pages = 0;
 		pobjects = 0;
@@ -2496,7 +2507,16 @@ static void put_cpu_partial(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page, int drain)
 				 * partial array is full. Move the existing
 				 * set to the per node partial list.
 				 */
+#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
 				unfreeze_partials(s);
+#else
+				/*
+				 * Postpone unfreezing until we drop the local
+				 * lock to avoid relocking.
+				 */
+				page_to_unfreeze = oldpage;
+#endif
+
 				oldpage = NULL;
 				pobjects = 0;
 				pages = 0;
@@ -2511,9 +2531,17 @@ static void put_cpu_partial(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page, int drain)
 		page->pobjects = pobjects;
 		page->next = oldpage;
 
+#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT
 	} while (this_cpu_cmpxchg(s->cpu_slab->partial, oldpage, page)
 								!= oldpage);
-	slub_put_cpu_ptr(s->cpu_slab);
+#else
+		this_cpu_write(s->cpu_slab->partial, page);
+	} while (false);
+#endif
+
+	local_unlock(&s->cpu_slab->lock);
+	if (page_to_unfreeze)
+		__unfreeze_partials(s, page_to_unfreeze);
 #endif	/* CONFIG_SLUB_CPU_PARTIAL */
 }
 
-- 
2.32.0


  reply	other threads:[~2021-07-25 19:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-08  9:42 [ANNOUNCE] v5.13-rt1 Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-09  5:20 ` [patch] mm/slub: Fix kmem_cache_alloc_bulk() error path Mike Galbraith
2021-07-09  5:20 ` [patch] mm/slub: Replace do_slab_free() local_lock_irqsave/restore() calls in PREEMPT_RT scope Mike Galbraith
2021-07-09  5:21 ` [rfc/patch] mm/slub: restore/expand unfreeze_partials() local exclusion scope Mike Galbraith
2021-07-09  5:25   ` Mike Galbraith
2021-07-09 19:28   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-07-10  1:12     ` Mike Galbraith
2021-07-15 16:34       ` Mike Galbraith
2021-07-17 14:58         ` [patch] v2 " Mike Galbraith
2021-07-18  7:58           ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-07-18  8:11             ` Mike Galbraith
2021-07-18 15:43           ` Mike Galbraith
2021-07-18 21:19           ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-07-19  4:01             ` Mike Galbraith
2021-07-19 13:15               ` Mike Galbraith
2021-07-20  2:46           ` kernel test robot
2021-07-20  8:56         ` [rfc/patch] " Vlastimil Babka
2021-07-20 11:26           ` Mike Galbraith
2021-07-21  4:56             ` Mike Galbraith
2021-07-21  8:44               ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-07-21  9:33                 ` Mike Galbraith
2021-07-23 22:39                   ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-07-24  2:25                     ` Mike Galbraith
2021-07-25 14:09                     ` Mike Galbraith
2021-07-25 14:16                       ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-07-25 15:02                         ` Mike Galbraith
2021-07-25 16:27                           ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-07-25 19:12                             ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2021-07-25 19:34                               ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-07-26 10:04                                 ` Mike Galbraith
2021-07-26 17:00                                 ` Mike Galbraith
2021-07-26 21:26                                   ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-07-27  4:09                                     ` Mike Galbraith
2021-07-28 16:59                                       ` Vlastimil Babka
2021-07-29  4:51                                         ` Mike Galbraith
2021-07-29  9:51                                           ` Vlastimil Babka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=73f032c2-70f1-77b6-9fd2-9aca52fd5b4d@suse.cz \
    --to=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).