linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au>
Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>,
	Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>,
	linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Felipe Alfaro Solana <felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org>,
	Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] O6int for interactivity
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 12:18:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5.2.1.1.2.20030718120229.01a8fcf0@pop.gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3F1794F0.1090803@cyberone.com.au>

At 04:34 PM 7/18/2003 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:

>Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
>>no_load:
>>Kernel          [runs]  Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
>>2.5.69               1  153     94.8    0.0     0.0     1.00
>>2.5.70               1  153     94.1    0.0     0.0     1.00
>>2.6.0-test1          1  153     94.1    0.0     0.0     1.00
>>2.6.0-test1-mm1      1  152     94.7    0.0     0.0     1.00
>>cacherun:
>>Kernel          [runs]  Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
>>2.5.69               1  146     98.6    0.0     0.0     0.95
>>2.5.70               1  146     98.6    0.0     0.0     0.95
>>2.6.0-test1          1  146     98.6    0.0     0.0     0.95
>>2.6.0-test1-mm1      1  146     98.6    0.0     0.0     0.96
>>process_load:
>>Kernel          [runs]  Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
>>2.5.69               1  331     43.8    90.0    55.3    2.16
>>2.5.70               1  199     72.4    27.0    25.5    1.30
>>2.6.0-test1          1  264     54.5    61.0    44.3    1.73
>>2.6.0-test1-mm1      1  323     44.9    88.0    54.2    2.12
>>ctar_load:
>>Kernel          [runs]  Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
>>2.5.69               1  190     77.9    0.0     0.0     1.24
>>2.5.70               1  186     80.1    0.0     0.0     1.22
>>2.6.0-test1          1  213     70.4    0.0     0.0     1.39
>>2.6.0-test1-mm1      1  207     72.5    0.0     0.0     1.36
>>xtar_load:
>>Kernel          [runs]  Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
>>2.5.69               1  196     75.0    0.0     3.1     1.28
>>2.5.70               1  195     75.9    0.0     3.1     1.27
>>2.6.0-test1          1  193     76.7    1.0     4.1     1.26
>>2.6.0-test1-mm1      1  195     75.9    1.0     4.1     1.28
>>io_load:
>>Kernel          [runs]  Time    CPU%    Loads   LCPU%   Ratio
>>2.5.69               1  437     34.6    69.1    15.1    2.86
>>2.5.70               1  401     37.7    72.3    17.4    2.62
>>2.6.0-test1          1  243     61.3    48.1    17.3    1.59
>>2.6.0-test1-mm1      1  336     44.9    64.5    17.3    2.21
>
>Looks like gcc is getting less priority after a read completes.
>Keep an eye on this please.

That _might_ (add salt) be priorities of kernel threads dropping too low.

I'm also seeing occasional total stalls under heavy I/O in the order of 
10-12 seconds (even the disk stops).  I have no idea if that's something in 
mm or the scheduler changes though, as I've yet to do any isolation and/or 
tinkering.  All I know at this point is that I haven't seen it in stock yet.

         -Mike 


  reply	other threads:[~2003-07-18 10:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-16 14:30 [PATCH] O6int for interactivity Con Kolivas
2003-07-16 15:22 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-07-16 19:55   ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-07-16 17:08 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-07-16 21:59 ` Wiktor Wodecki
2003-07-16 22:30   ` Con Kolivas
2003-07-16 22:12 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-17  0:33   ` Con Kolivas
2003-07-17  0:35     ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-17  1:12       ` Con Kolivas
2003-07-17  0:48     ` Wade
2003-07-17  1:15       ` Con Kolivas
2003-07-17  1:27         ` Eugene Teo
2003-07-17  3:05 ` Wes Janzen
2003-07-17  9:05 ` Alex Riesen
2003-07-17  9:14   ` Con Kolivas
2003-07-18  7:38     ` Alex Riesen
     [not found]       ` <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307251628500.26172-300000@localhost.localdomain>
2003-07-25 19:40         ` Alex Riesen
     [not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.55.0307161241280.4787@bigblue.dev.mcafeelabs.co m>
2003-07-18  5:38   ` Mike Galbraith
2003-07-18  6:34     ` Nick Piggin
2003-07-18 10:18       ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2003-07-18 10:31         ` Wiktor Wodecki
2003-07-18 10:43           ` Con Kolivas
2003-07-18 11:34             ` Wiktor Wodecki
2003-07-18 11:38               ` Nick Piggin
2003-07-19 10:59                 ` Wiktor Wodecki
2003-07-18 15:46           ` Mike Galbraith
2003-07-18 16:52             ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-18 17:05               ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-18 17:39                 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-07-18 19:31                   ` Davide Libenzi
     [not found]                 ` <Pine.LNX.4.55.0307181038450.5608@bigblue.dev.mcafeelabs.co m>
2003-07-18 20:31                   ` Mike Galbraith
2003-07-18 20:38                     ` Davide Libenzi
     [not found]                 ` <Pine.LNX.4.55.0307181333520.5608@bigblue.dev.mcafeelabs.co m>
2003-07-19 17:04                   ` Mike Galbraith
2003-07-21  0:21                     ` Davide Libenzi
     [not found]                 ` <Pine.LNX.4.55.0307201715130.3548@bigblue.dev.mcafeelabs.co m>
2003-07-21  5:36                   ` Mike Galbraith
2003-07-21 12:39                   ` [NOTAPATCH] " Mike Galbraith
2003-07-21 17:13                     ` Mike Galbraith
2003-07-18 14:24         ` Con Kolivas
2003-07-18 15:50           ` Mike Galbraith
2003-07-18 13:46     ` Davide Libenzi
     [not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.55.0307180630450.5077@bigblue.dev.mcafeelabs.co m>
2003-07-18 15:41   ` Mike Galbraith
     [not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.55.0307180951050.5608@bigblue.dev.mcafeelabs.co m>
2003-07-18 18:49   ` Mike Galbraith
2003-07-16 20:20 Shane Shrybman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5.2.1.1.2.20030718120229.01a8fcf0@pop.gmx.net \
    --to=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
    --cc=felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org \
    --cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=piggin@cyberone.com.au \
    --cc=zwane@arm.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).