From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Wiktor Wodecki <wodecki@gmx.net>
Cc: Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>,
Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>,
linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Felipe Alfaro Solana <felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org>,
Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] O6int for interactivity
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 17:46:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5.2.1.1.2.20030718174433.01b12878@pop.gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030718103105.GE622@gmx.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 918 bytes --]
At 12:31 PM 7/18/2003 +0200, Wiktor Wodecki wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 12:18:33PM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > That _might_ (add salt) be priorities of kernel threads dropping too low.
> >
> > I'm also seeing occasional total stalls under heavy I/O in the order of
> > 10-12 seconds (even the disk stops). I have no idea if that's
> something in
> > mm or the scheduler changes though, as I've yet to do any isolation and/or
> > tinkering. All I know at this point is that I haven't seen it in stock
> yet.
>
>I've seen this too while doing a huge nfs transfer from a 2.6 machine to
>a 2.4 machine (sparc32). Thought it'd be something with the nfs changes
>which were recently, might be the scheduler, tho. Ah, and it is fully
>reproducable.
Telling to not mess with my kernel threads seems to have fixed it here...
no stalls during the whole contest run. New contest numbers attached.
-Mike
[-- Attachment #2: contest.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3778 bytes --]
no_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.69 1 153 94.8 0.0 0.0 1.00
2.5.70 1 153 94.1 0.0 0.0 1.00
2.6.0-test1 1 153 94.1 0.0 0.0 1.00
2.6.0-test1-mm1 1 152 94.7 0.0 0.0 1.00
2.6.0-test1-mm1X 1 153 94.8 0.0 0.0 1.00
cacherun:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.69 1 146 98.6 0.0 0.0 0.95
2.5.70 1 146 98.6 0.0 0.0 0.95
2.6.0-test1 1 146 98.6 0.0 0.0 0.95
2.6.0-test1-mm1 1 146 98.6 0.0 0.0 0.96
2.6.0-test1-mm1X 1 146 98.6 0.0 0.0 0.95
process_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.69 1 331 43.8 90.0 55.3 2.16
2.5.70 1 199 72.4 27.0 25.5 1.30
2.6.0-test1 1 264 54.5 61.0 44.3 1.73
2.6.0-test1-mm1 1 323 44.9 88.0 54.2 2.12
2.6.0-test1-mm1X 1 268 54.1 62.0 44.8 1.75
ctar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.69 1 190 77.9 0.0 0.0 1.24
2.5.70 1 186 80.1 0.0 0.0 1.22
2.6.0-test1 1 213 70.4 0.0 0.0 1.39
2.6.0-test1-mm1 1 207 72.5 0.0 0.0 1.36
2.6.0-test1-mm1X 1 213 70.4 0.0 0.0 1.39
xtar_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.69 1 196 75.0 0.0 3.1 1.28
2.5.70 1 195 75.9 0.0 3.1 1.27
2.6.0-test1 1 193 76.7 1.0 4.1 1.26
2.6.0-test1-mm1 1 195 75.9 1.0 4.1 1.28
2.6.0-test1-mm1X 1 191 77.5 1.0 4.2 1.25
io_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.69 1 437 34.6 69.1 15.1 2.86
2.5.70 1 401 37.7 72.3 17.4 2.62
2.6.0-test1 1 243 61.3 48.1 17.3 1.59
2.6.0-test1-mm1 1 336 44.9 64.5 17.3 2.21
2.6.0-test1-mm1X 1 317 47.3 63.5 17.7 2.07
io_other:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.69 1 387 38.8 69.3 17.3 2.53
2.5.70 1 422 36.0 75.3 17.1 2.76
2.6.0-test1 1 258 57.8 55.8 19.0 1.69
2.6.0-test1-mm1 1 330 45.5 63.2 17.2 2.17
2.6.0-test1-mm1X 1 302 49.7 59.1 17.2 1.97
read_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.69 1 221 67.0 9.4 3.6 1.44
2.5.70 1 220 67.3 9.4 3.6 1.44
2.6.0-test1 1 200 74.0 9.7 4.0 1.31
2.6.0-test1-mm1 1 190 78.4 9.2 4.2 1.25
2.6.0-test1-mm1X 1 187 79.7 8.4 3.7 1.22
list_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.69 1 203 71.4 99.0 20.2 1.33
2.5.70 1 205 70.7 104.0 20.5 1.34
2.6.0-test1 1 199 72.4 102.0 21.6 1.30
2.6.0-test1-mm1 1 193 75.1 91.0 19.7 1.27
2.6.0-test1-mm1X 1 194 74.7 91.0 19.6 1.27
mem_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.69 1 256 57.8 34.0 1.2 1.67
2.5.70 1 252 58.7 33.0 1.2 1.65
2.6.0-test1 1 309 48.2 75.0 2.3 2.02
2.6.0-test1-mm1 1 277 53.8 38.0 1.4 1.82
2.6.0-test1-mm1X 1 225 65.8 38.0 1.8 1.47
dbench_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.69 1 517 28.8 5.0 35.6 3.38
2.5.70 1 424 35.1 3.0 26.7 2.77
2.6.0-test1 1 347 42.7 4.0 39.5 2.27
2.6.0-test1-mm1 1 377 39.8 4.0 36.9 2.48
2.6.0-test1-mm1X 1 510 29.4 5.0 34.3 3.33
ab_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.5.69 1 300 48.3 46.0 21.7 1.96
2.5.70 1 300 48.0 46.0 22.0 1.96
2.6.0-test1 1 281 51.6 50.0 25.6 1.84
2.6.0-test1-mm1 1 229 63.3 30.0 18.3 1.51
2.6.0-test1-mm1X 1 225 64.4 27.0 18.2 1.47
irman2_load:
Kernel [runs] Time CPU% Loads LCPU% Ratio
2.6.0-test1 1 999 14.5 31.0 0.0 6.53
2.6.0-test1-mm1 1 210 69.0 6.0 0.0 1.38
2.6.0-test1-mm1X 1 210 69.0 6.0 0.0 1.37
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-18 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-16 14:30 [PATCH] O6int for interactivity Con Kolivas
2003-07-16 15:22 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-07-16 19:55 ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2003-07-16 17:08 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-07-16 21:59 ` Wiktor Wodecki
2003-07-16 22:30 ` Con Kolivas
2003-07-16 22:12 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-17 0:33 ` Con Kolivas
2003-07-17 0:35 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-17 1:12 ` Con Kolivas
2003-07-17 0:48 ` Wade
2003-07-17 1:15 ` Con Kolivas
2003-07-17 1:27 ` Eugene Teo
2003-07-17 3:05 ` Wes Janzen
2003-07-17 9:05 ` Alex Riesen
2003-07-17 9:14 ` Con Kolivas
2003-07-18 7:38 ` Alex Riesen
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307251628500.26172-300000@localhost.localdomain>
2003-07-25 19:40 ` Alex Riesen
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.55.0307161241280.4787@bigblue.dev.mcafeelabs.co m>
2003-07-18 5:38 ` Mike Galbraith
2003-07-18 6:34 ` Nick Piggin
2003-07-18 10:18 ` Mike Galbraith
2003-07-18 10:31 ` Wiktor Wodecki
2003-07-18 10:43 ` Con Kolivas
2003-07-18 11:34 ` Wiktor Wodecki
2003-07-18 11:38 ` Nick Piggin
2003-07-19 10:59 ` Wiktor Wodecki
2003-07-18 15:46 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2003-07-18 16:52 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-18 17:05 ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-18 17:39 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-07-18 19:31 ` Davide Libenzi
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.55.0307181038450.5608@bigblue.dev.mcafeelabs.co m>
2003-07-18 20:31 ` Mike Galbraith
2003-07-18 20:38 ` Davide Libenzi
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.55.0307181333520.5608@bigblue.dev.mcafeelabs.co m>
2003-07-19 17:04 ` Mike Galbraith
2003-07-21 0:21 ` Davide Libenzi
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.55.0307201715130.3548@bigblue.dev.mcafeelabs.co m>
2003-07-21 5:36 ` Mike Galbraith
2003-07-21 12:39 ` [NOTAPATCH] " Mike Galbraith
2003-07-21 17:13 ` Mike Galbraith
2003-07-18 14:24 ` Con Kolivas
2003-07-18 15:50 ` Mike Galbraith
2003-07-18 13:46 ` Davide Libenzi
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.55.0307180630450.5077@bigblue.dev.mcafeelabs.co m>
2003-07-18 15:41 ` Mike Galbraith
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.55.0307180951050.5608@bigblue.dev.mcafeelabs.co m>
2003-07-18 18:49 ` Mike Galbraith
2003-07-16 20:20 Shane Shrybman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5.2.1.1.2.20030718174433.01b12878@pop.gmx.net \
--to=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org \
--cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=piggin@cyberone.com.au \
--cc=wodecki@gmx.net \
--cc=zwane@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).