From: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, acme@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org,
eranian@google.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
ak@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 01/23] perf/x86: Support outputting XMM registers
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 09:14:58 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5533614f-3d97-6e50-c63c-bee33c00c93b@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1903260106210.1789@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
On 3/25/2019 8:11 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Mar 2019, kan.liang@linux.intel.com wrote:
>>
>> + PERF_REG_X86_XMM15 = 62,
>> +
>> + /* All registers include the XMMX registers */
>> + PERF_REG_X86_MAX = PERF_REG_X86_XMM15 + 2,
>
> Ergo: PERF_REG_X86_MAX == 64
>
>> -#define REG_RESERVED (~((1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_MAX) - 1ULL))
>> +#define REG_RESERVED \
>> + (PERF_REG_X86_MAX == 64 ? 0 : ~((1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_MAX)) - 1ULL)
>
> So what the heck is this conditional for?
>
> But now 32bit has also access to the upper 8 GPRs simply because
> REG_RESERVED is now 0 and REG_NOSUPPORT is not excluding them either.
>
The patch as below fixes the name issue, removes unnecessary check for
REG_RESERVED, and adds REG_NOSUPPORT for 32bit to exclude unsupported
registers.
I will also change the user space patch accordingly and send out the V4.
Thanks,
Kan
------
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
index e2b1447192a8..9378c6b2128f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
@@ -560,6 +560,16 @@ int x86_pmu_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
return -EINVAL;
}
+ if (event->attr.sample_regs_user & ~PEBS_REGS)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ /*
+ * Besides the general purpose registers, XMM registers may
+ * be collected in PEBS on some platforms, e.g. Icelake
+ */
+ if ((event->attr.sample_regs_intr & ~PEBS_REGS) &&
+ (!x86_pmu.has_xmm_regs || !event->attr.precise_ip))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
return x86_setup_perfctr(event);
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
index a75955741c50..6428941a5073 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/perf_event.h
@@ -657,6 +657,8 @@ struct x86_pmu {
* Check period value for PERF_EVENT_IOC_PERIOD ioctl.
*/
int (*check_period) (struct perf_event *event, u64 period);
+
+ unsigned int has_xmm_regs : 1; /* support XMM regs */
};
struct x86_perf_task_context {
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
index 8bdf74902293..d9f5bbe44b3c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/perf_event.h
@@ -248,6 +248,11 @@ extern void perf_events_lapic_init(void);
#define PERF_EFLAGS_VM (1UL << 5)
struct pt_regs;
+struct x86_perf_regs {
+ struct pt_regs regs;
+ u64 *xmm_regs;
+};
+
extern unsigned long perf_instruction_pointer(struct pt_regs *regs);
extern unsigned long perf_misc_flags(struct pt_regs *regs);
#define perf_misc_flags(regs) perf_misc_flags(regs)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
index f3329cabce5c..ac67bbea10ca 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
@@ -27,8 +27,29 @@ enum perf_event_x86_regs {
PERF_REG_X86_R13,
PERF_REG_X86_R14,
PERF_REG_X86_R15,
-
+ /* These are the limits for the GPRs. */
PERF_REG_X86_32_MAX = PERF_REG_X86_GS + 1,
PERF_REG_X86_64_MAX = PERF_REG_X86_R15 + 1,
+
+ /* These all need two bits set because they are 128bit */
+ PERF_REG_X86_XMM0 = 32,
+ PERF_REG_X86_XMM1 = 34,
+ PERF_REG_X86_XMM2 = 36,
+ PERF_REG_X86_XMM3 = 38,
+ PERF_REG_X86_XMM4 = 40,
+ PERF_REG_X86_XMM5 = 42,
+ PERF_REG_X86_XMM6 = 44,
+ PERF_REG_X86_XMM7 = 46,
+ PERF_REG_X86_XMM8 = 48,
+ PERF_REG_X86_XMM9 = 50,
+ PERF_REG_X86_XMM10 = 52,
+ PERF_REG_X86_XMM11 = 54,
+ PERF_REG_X86_XMM12 = 56,
+ PERF_REG_X86_XMM13 = 58,
+ PERF_REG_X86_XMM14 = 60,
+ PERF_REG_X86_XMM15 = 62,
+
+ /* These include both GPRs and XMMX registers */
+ PERF_REG_X86_XMM_MAX = PERF_REG_X86_XMM15 + 2,
};
#endif /* _ASM_X86_PERF_REGS_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
index c06c4c16c6b6..9e2f6be1e770 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
@@ -59,20 +59,41 @@ static unsigned int pt_regs_offset[PERF_REG_X86_MAX] = {
u64 perf_reg_value(struct pt_regs *regs, int idx)
{
+ struct x86_perf_regs *perf_regs;
+
+ if (idx >= PERF_REG_X86_XMM0 && idx < PERF_REG_X86_XMM_MAX) {
+ perf_regs = container_of(regs, struct x86_perf_regs, regs);
+ if (!perf_regs->xmm_regs)
+ return 0;
+ return perf_regs->xmm_regs[idx - PERF_REG_X86_XMM0];
+ }
+
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(idx >= ARRAY_SIZE(pt_regs_offset)))
return 0;
return regs_get_register(regs, pt_regs_offset[idx]);
}
-#define REG_RESERVED (~((1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_MAX) - 1ULL))
+#define REG_RESERVED 0
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
+#define REG_NOSUPPORT ((1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_R8) | \
+ (1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_R9) | \
+ (1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_R10) | \
+ (1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_R11) | \
+ (1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_R12) | \
+ (1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_R13) | \
+ (1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_R14) | \
+ (1ULL << PERF_REG_X86_R15))
+
int perf_reg_validate(u64 mask)
{
if (!mask || mask & REG_RESERVED)
return -EINVAL;
+ if (mask & REG_NOSUPPORT)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
return 0;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-26 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-22 16:36 [PATCH V3 00/23] perf: Add Icelake support kan.liang
2019-03-22 16:36 ` [PATCH V3 01/23] perf/x86: Support outputting XMM registers kan.liang
2019-03-22 17:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-22 17:22 ` Andi Kleen
2019-03-23 9:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-25 20:35 ` Liang, Kan
2019-03-26 0:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-03-26 0:11 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-03-26 13:14 ` Liang, Kan [this message]
2019-03-26 13:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-03-26 13:55 ` Liang, Kan
2019-03-22 16:36 ` [PATCH V3 02/23] perf/x86/intel: Extract memory code PEBS parser for reuse kan.liang
2019-03-22 16:36 ` [PATCH V3 03/23] perf/x86/intel/ds: Extract code of event update in short period kan.liang
2019-03-22 16:36 ` [PATCH V3 04/23] perf/x86/intel: Support adaptive PEBSv4 kan.liang
2019-03-22 16:37 ` [PATCH V3 05/23] perf/x86/lbr: Avoid reading the LBRs when adaptive PEBS handles them kan.liang
2019-03-22 16:37 ` [PATCH V3 06/23] perf/x86: Support constraint ranges kan.liang
2019-03-22 16:37 ` [PATCH V3 07/23] perf/x86/intel: Add Icelake support kan.liang
2019-03-22 16:37 ` [PATCH V3 08/23] perf/x86/intel/cstate: " kan.liang
2019-03-22 16:37 ` [PATCH V3 09/23] perf/x86/intel/rapl: " kan.liang
2019-03-22 16:37 ` [PATCH V3 10/23] perf/x86/msr: " kan.liang
2019-03-22 16:37 ` [PATCH V3 11/23] perf/x86/intel/uncore: Add Intel Icelake uncore support kan.liang
2019-03-22 16:37 ` [PATCH V3 12/23] perf/core: Support a REMOVE transaction kan.liang
2019-03-22 16:37 ` [PATCH V3 13/23] perf/x86/intel: Basic support for metrics counters kan.liang
2019-03-22 16:37 ` [PATCH V3 14/23] perf/x86/intel: Support overflows on SLOTS kan.liang
2019-03-22 16:37 ` [PATCH V3 15/23] perf/x86/intel: Support hardware TopDown metrics kan.liang
2019-03-22 16:37 ` [PATCH V3 16/23] perf/x86/intel: Set correct weight for topdown subevent counters kan.liang
2019-03-22 16:37 ` [PATCH V3 17/23] perf/x86/intel: Export new top down events for Icelake kan.liang
2019-03-22 16:37 ` [PATCH V3 18/23] perf/x86/intel: Disable sampling read slots and topdown kan.liang
2019-03-22 16:37 ` [PATCH V3 19/23] perf/x86/intel: Support CPUID 10.ECX to disable fixed counters kan.liang
2019-03-22 16:37 ` [PATCH V3 20/23] perf, tools: Add support for recording and printing XMM registers kan.liang
2019-03-22 16:37 ` [PATCH 21/23] perf, tools, stat: Support new per thread TopDown metrics kan.liang
2019-03-22 16:37 ` [PATCH V3 22/23] perf, tools: Add documentation for topdown metrics kan.liang
2019-03-22 16:37 ` [PATCH V3 23/23] perf vendor events intel: Add JSON files for Icelake kan.liang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5533614f-3d97-6e50-c63c-bee33c00c93b@linux.intel.com \
--to=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).