From: Christopher Covington <cov@codeaurora.org>
To: Dongdong Liu <liudongdong3@huawei.com>,
helgaas@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, will.deacon@arm.com,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, rafael@kernel.org,
hanjun.guo@linaro.org, Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com,
okaya@codeaurora.org, jchandra@broadcom.com, tn@semihalf.com
Cc: robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com, mw@semihalf.com,
Liviu.Dudau@arm.com, ddaney@caviumnetworks.com,
wangyijing@huawei.com, Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com,
msalter@redhat.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org,
jcm@redhat.com, andrea.gallo@linaro.org, dhdang@apm.com,
jeremy.linton@arm.com, gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com,
charles.chenxin@huawei.com, linuxarm@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V2 1/2] ACPI/PCI: Match PCI config space accessors against platfrom specific ECAM quirks
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 11:47:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <575ED57F.6050503@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1465822923-33599-2-git-send-email-liudongdong3@huawei.com>
Hi Dongdong,
On 06/13/2016 09:02 AM, Dongdong Liu wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c
> index d3c3e85..49612b3 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_mcfg.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,10 @@
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/pci.h>
> #include <linux/pci-acpi.h>
> +#include <linux/pci-ecam.h>
> +
> +/* Root pointer to the mapped MCFG table */
> +static struct acpi_table_mcfg *mcfg_table;
>
> /* Structure to hold entries from the MCFG table */
> struct mcfg_entry {
> @@ -35,6 +39,38 @@ struct mcfg_entry {
> /* List to save mcfg entries */
> static LIST_HEAD(pci_mcfg_list);
>
> +extern struct pci_cfg_fixup __start_acpi_mcfg_fixups[];
> +extern struct pci_cfg_fixup __end_acpi_mcfg_fixups[];
> +
> +struct pci_ecam_ops *pci_mcfg_get_ops(struct acpi_pci_root *root)
> +{
> + int bus_num = root->secondary.start;
> + int domain = root->segment;
> + struct pci_cfg_fixup *f;
> +
> + if (!mcfg_table)
> + return &pci_generic_ecam_ops;
> +
> + /*
> + * Match against platform specific quirks and return corresponding
> + * CAM ops.
> + *
> + * First match against PCI topology <domain:bus> then use OEM ID and
> + * OEM revision from MCFG table standard header.
> + */
> + for (f = __start_acpi_mcfg_fixups; f < __end_acpi_mcfg_fixups; f++) {
> + if ((f->domain == domain || f->domain == PCI_MCFG_DOMAIN_ANY) &&
> + (f->bus_num == bus_num || f->bus_num == PCI_MCFG_BUS_ANY) &&
> + (!strncmp(f->oem_id, mcfg_table->header.oem_id,
> + ACPI_OEM_ID_SIZE)) &&
> + (!strncmp(f->oem_table_id, mcfg_table->header.oem_table_id,
> + ACPI_OEM_TABLE_ID_SIZE)))
This would just be a small convenience, but if the character count used here were
min(strlen(f->oem_id), ACPI_OEM_ID_SIZE)
then the parameters to DECLARE_ACPI_MCFG_FIXUP macro could be substrings and
wouldn't need to be padded out to the full length.
> + return f->ops;
> + }
> + /* No quirks, use ECAM */
> + return &pci_generic_ecam_ops;
> +}
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci-acpi.h b/include/linux/pci-acpi.h
> index 7d63a66..088a1da 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci-acpi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci-acpi.h
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ static inline acpi_status pci_acpi_remove_pm_notifier(struct acpi_device *dev)
> extern phys_addr_t acpi_pci_root_get_mcfg_addr(acpi_handle handle);
>
> extern phys_addr_t pci_mcfg_lookup(u16 domain, struct resource *bus_res);
> +extern struct pci_ecam_ops *pci_mcfg_get_ops(struct acpi_pci_root *root);
>
> static inline acpi_handle acpi_find_root_bridge_handle(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> {
> @@ -72,6 +73,25 @@ struct acpi_pci_root_ops {
> int (*prepare_resources)(struct acpi_pci_root_info *info);
> };
>
> +struct pci_cfg_fixup {
> + struct pci_ecam_ops *ops;
> + char *oem_id;
> + char *oem_table_id;
> + int domain;
> + int bus_num;
> +};
> +
> +#define PCI_MCFG_DOMAIN_ANY -1
> +#define PCI_MCFG_BUS_ANY -1
> +
> +/* Designate a routine to fix up buggy MCFG */
> +#define DECLARE_ACPI_MCFG_FIXUP(ops, oem_id, oem_table_id, dom, bus) \
> + static const struct pci_cfg_fixup \
> + __mcfg_fixup_##oem_id##oem_table_id##dom##bus \
I'm not entirely sure that this is the right fix--I'm pretty blindly
following a GCC documentation suggestion [1]--but removing the first two
preprocessor concatenation operators "##" solved the following build error
for me.
include/linux/pci-acpi.h:90:2: error: pasting "__mcfg_fixup_" and ""QCOM"" does not give a valid preprocessing token
__mcfg_fixup_##oem_id##oem_table_id##dom##bus \
^
arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c:225:1: note: in expansion of macro ‘DECLARE_ACPI_MCFG_FIXUP’
DECLARE_ACPI_MCFG_FIXUP(&pci_32b_ecam_ops, "QCOM", "QDF2432", PCI_MCFG_DOMAIN_ANY, PCI_MCFG_BUS_ANY);
^
arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c:225:44: error: pasting ""QCOM"" and ""QDF2432"" does not give a valid preprocessing token
DECLARE_ACPI_MCFG_FIXUP(&pci_32b_ecam_ops, "QCOM", "QDF2432", PCI_MCFG_DOMAIN_ANY, PCI_MCFG_BUS_ANY);
^
include/linux/pci-acpi.h:90:17: note: in definition of macro ‘DECLARE_ACPI_MCFG_FIXUP’
__mcfg_fixup_##oem_id##oem_table_id##dom##bus \
^
arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c:225:52: error: pasting ""QDF2432"" and "PCI_MCFG_DOMAIN_ANY" does not give a valid preprocessi
ng token
DECLARE_ACPI_MCFG_FIXUP(&pci_32b_ecam_ops, "QCOM", "QDF2432", PCI_MCFG_DOMAIN_ANY, PCI_MCFG_BUS_ANY);
^
include/linux/pci-acpi.h:90:25: note: in definition of macro ‘DECLARE_ACPI_MCFG_FIXUP’
__mcfg_fixup_##oem_id##oem_table_id##dom##bus \
^
arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c:225:44: error: expected ‘=’, ‘,’, ‘;’, ‘asm’ or ‘__attribute__’ before string constant
DECLARE_ACPI_MCFG_FIXUP(&pci_32b_ecam_ops, "QCOM", "QDF2432", PCI_MCFG_DOMAIN_ANY, PCI_MCFG_BUS_ANY);
^
include/linux/pci-acpi.h:90:17: note: in definition of macro ‘DECLARE_ACPI_MCFG_FIXUP’
__mcfg_fixup_##oem_id##oem_table_id##dom##bus \
^
make[1]: *** [arch/arm64/kernel/pci.o] Error 1
make: *** [arch/arm64/kernel] Error 2
1. https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/cpp/Concatenation.html#Concatenation
> + __used __attribute__((__section__(".acpi_fixup_mcfg"), \
> + aligned((sizeof(void *))))) = \
> + { ops, oem_id, oem_table_id, dom, bus };
> +
> extern int acpi_pci_probe_root_resources(struct acpi_pci_root_info *info);
> extern struct pci_bus *acpi_pci_root_create(struct acpi_pci_root *root,
> struct acpi_pci_root_ops *ops,
>
Thanks,
Cov
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-13 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-13 13:02 [RFC PATCH V2 0/2] ECAM quirks handling for ARM64 platforms Dongdong Liu
2016-06-13 13:02 ` [RFC PATCH V2 1/2] ACPI/PCI: Match PCI config space accessors against platfrom specific ECAM quirks Dongdong Liu
2016-06-13 13:54 ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-06-13 14:02 ` Sinan Kaya
2016-06-13 14:29 ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-06-13 15:12 ` okaya
2016-06-13 15:59 ` Jeffrey Hugo
2016-06-13 21:07 ` Duc Dang
2016-06-16 6:31 ` [Linaro-acpi] " Jon Masters
2016-06-16 7:45 ` Duc Dang
2016-06-16 7:54 ` Jon Masters
2016-06-13 15:47 ` Christopher Covington [this message]
2016-06-13 20:57 ` Duc Dang
2016-06-14 5:51 ` Dongdong Liu
2016-06-14 9:00 ` Duc Dang
2016-06-14 9:45 ` Dongdong Liu
2016-06-14 11:52 ` Tomasz Nowicki
2016-06-14 17:43 ` Duc Dang
2016-06-13 13:02 ` [RFC PATCH V2 2/2] ARM64/PCI: Start using quirks handling for ACPI based PCI host controller Dongdong Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=575ED57F.6050503@codeaurora.org \
--to=cov@codeaurora.org \
--cc=Liviu.Dudau@arm.com \
--cc=Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=andrea.gallo@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=charles.chenxin@huawei.com \
--cc=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=dhdang@apm.com \
--cc=gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com \
--cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=jchandra@broadcom.com \
--cc=jcm@redhat.com \
--cc=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
--cc=linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=liudongdong3@huawei.com \
--cc=msalter@redhat.com \
--cc=mw@semihalf.com \
--cc=okaya@codeaurora.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=tn@semihalf.com \
--cc=wangyijing@huawei.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).