From: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Kirti Wankhede" <kwankhede@nvidia.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mlx5-next 2/7] vfio: Add an API to check migration state transition validity
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 16:55:35 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <60989aa8-4231-0cdf-47bb-1e2026bd1f17@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YUxiPqShZT4bk0uL@unreal>
On 9/23/2021 2:17 PM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 10:33:10AM +0000, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote:
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Leon Romanovsky [mailto:leon@kernel.org]
>>> Sent: 22 September 2021 11:39
>>> To: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>; Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
>>> Cc: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>; Alex Williamson
>>> <alex.williamson@redhat.com>; Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>; David
>>> S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>; Kirti
>>> Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>; kvm@vger.kernel.org;
>>> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-pci@vger.kernel.org;
>>> linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org; Saeed Mahameed
>>> <saeedm@nvidia.com>
>>> Subject: [PATCH mlx5-next 2/7] vfio: Add an API to check migration state
>>> transition validity
>>>
>>> From: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>
>>>
>>> Add an API in the core layer to check migration state transition validity
>>> as part of a migration flow.
>>>
>>> The valid transitions follow the expected usage as described in
>>> uapi/vfio.h and triggered by QEMU.
>>>
>>> This ensures that all migration implementations follow a consistent
>>> migration state machine.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/vfio/vfio.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> include/linux/vfio.h | 1 +
>>> 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
>>> index 3c034fe14ccb..c3ca33e513c8 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio.c
>>> @@ -1664,6 +1664,47 @@ static int vfio_device_fops_release(struct inode
>>> *inode, struct file *filep)
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +/**
>>> + * vfio_change_migration_state_allowed - Checks whether a migration state
>>> + * transition is valid.
>>> + * @new_state: The new state to move to.
>>> + * @old_state: The old state.
>>> + * Return: true if the transition is valid.
>>> + */
>>> +bool vfio_change_migration_state_allowed(u32 new_state, u32 old_state)
>>> +{
>>> + enum { MAX_STATE = VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_RESUMING };
>>> + static const u8 vfio_from_state_table[MAX_STATE + 1][MAX_STATE + 1] = {
>>> + [VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_STOP] = {
>>> + [VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_RUNNING] = 1,
>>> + [VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_RESUMING] = 1,
>>> + },
>>> + [VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_RUNNING] = {
>>> + [VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_STOP] = 1,
>>> + [VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_SAVING] = 1,
>>> + [VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_SAVING | VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_RUNNING]
>>> = 1,
>> Do we need to allow _RESUMING state here or not? As per the "State transitions"
>> section from uapi/linux/vfio.h,
> It looks like we missed this state transition.
>
> Thanks
I'm not sure this state transition is valid.
Kirti, When we would like to move from RUNNING to RESUMING ?
Sameerali, can you please re-test and update if you see this transition ?
>
>> " * 4. To start the resuming phase, the device state should be transitioned from
>> * the _RUNNING to the _RESUMING state."
>>
>> IIRC, I have seen that transition happening on the destination dev while testing the
>> HiSilicon ACC dev migration.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Shameer
>>
>>> + },
>>> + [VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_SAVING] = {
>>> + [VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_STOP] = 1,
>>> + [VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_RUNNING] = 1,
>>> + },
>>> + [VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_SAVING | VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_RUNNING] = {
>>> + [VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_RUNNING] = 1,
>>> + [VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_SAVING] = 1,
>>> + },
>>> + [VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_RESUMING] = {
>>> + [VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_RUNNING] = 1,
>>> + [VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_STOP] = 1,
>>> + },
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + if (new_state > MAX_STATE || old_state > MAX_STATE)
>>> + return false;
>>> +
>>> + return vfio_from_state_table[old_state][new_state];
>>> +}
>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vfio_change_migration_state_allowed);
>>> +
>>> static long vfio_device_fops_unl_ioctl(struct file *filep,
>>> unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
>>> {
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/vfio.h b/include/linux/vfio.h
>>> index b53a9557884a..e65137a708f1 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/vfio.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/vfio.h
>>> @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ extern struct vfio_device
>>> *vfio_device_get_from_dev(struct device *dev);
>>> extern void vfio_device_put(struct vfio_device *device);
>>>
>>> int vfio_assign_device_set(struct vfio_device *device, void *set_id);
>>> +bool vfio_change_migration_state_allowed(u32 new_state, u32 old_state);
>>>
>>> /* events for the backend driver notify callback */
>>> enum vfio_iommu_notify_type {
>>> --
>>> 2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-23 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <cover.1632305919.git.leonro@nvidia.com>
2021-09-22 10:38 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 1/7] PCI/IOV: Provide internal VF index Leon Romanovsky
2021-09-22 21:59 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-09-23 6:35 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-09-24 13:08 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-09-25 10:10 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-09-25 17:41 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-09-26 6:36 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-09-26 20:23 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-09-27 11:55 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-09-27 14:47 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-09-22 10:38 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 2/7] vfio: Add an API to check migration state transition validity Leon Romanovsky
2021-09-23 10:33 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-09-23 11:17 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-09-23 13:55 ` Max Gurtovoy [this message]
2021-09-24 7:44 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-09-24 9:37 ` Kirti Wankhede
2021-09-26 9:09 ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-09-26 16:17 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-09-27 18:24 ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-09-27 18:29 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-09-27 22:46 ` Alex Williamson
2021-09-27 23:12 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-28 19:19 ` Alex Williamson
2021-09-28 19:35 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-28 20:18 ` Alex Williamson
2021-09-29 16:16 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-29 18:06 ` Alex Williamson
2021-09-29 18:26 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-29 10:57 ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-09-29 10:44 ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-09-29 12:35 ` Alex Williamson
2021-09-29 13:26 ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-09-29 13:50 ` Alex Williamson
2021-09-29 14:36 ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-09-29 15:17 ` Alex Williamson
2021-09-29 15:28 ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-09-29 16:14 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-29 21:48 ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-09-29 22:44 ` Alex Williamson
2021-09-30 9:25 ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-09-30 12:41 ` Alex Williamson
2021-09-29 23:21 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-30 9:34 ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-09-30 14:47 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-30 15:32 ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-09-30 16:24 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-30 16:51 ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-09-30 17:01 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-09-22 10:38 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 3/7] vfio/pci_core: Make the region->release() function optional Leon Romanovsky
2021-09-23 13:57 ` Max Gurtovoy
2021-09-22 10:38 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 4/7] net/mlx5: Introduce migration bits and structures Leon Romanovsky
2021-09-24 5:48 ` Mark Zhang
2021-09-22 10:38 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 5/7] net/mlx5: Expose APIs to get/put the mlx5 core device Leon Romanovsky
2021-09-22 10:38 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 6/7] mlx5_vfio_pci: Expose migration commands over mlx5 device Leon Romanovsky
2021-09-28 20:22 ` Alex Williamson
2021-09-29 5:36 ` Leon Romanovsky
2021-09-22 10:38 ` [PATCH mlx5-next 7/7] mlx5_vfio_pci: Implement vfio_pci driver for mlx5 devices Leon Romanovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=60989aa8-4231-0cdf-47bb-1e2026bd1f17@nvidia.com \
--to=mgurtovoy@nvidia.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=yishaih@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).