Re: [PATCH v3 12/21] x86/virt/tdx: Create TDMRs to cover all system RAM

[Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>]

On Thu, 2022-04-28 at 09:22 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 4/5/22 21:49, Kai Huang wrote:
> > The kernel configures TDX usable memory regions to the TDX module via
> > an array of "TD Memory Region" (TDMR). 
> 
> One bit of language that's repeated in these changelogs that I don't
> like is "configure ... to".  I think that's a misuse of the word
> configure.  I'd say something more like:
> 
> 	The kernel configures TDX-usable memory regions by passing an
> 	array of "TD Memory Regions" (TDMRs) to the TDX module.
> 
> Could you please take a look over this series and reword those?

Thanks will do.

> 
> > Each TDMR entry (TDMR_INFO)
> > contains the information of the base/size of a memory region, the
> > base/size of the associated Physical Address Metadata Table (PAMT) and
> > a list of reserved areas in the region.
> > 
> > Create a number of TDMRs according to the verified e820 RAM entries.
> > As the first step only set up the base/size information for each TDMR.
> > 
> > TDMR must be 1G aligned and the size must be in 1G granularity.  This
> 
>  ^ Each

OK.

> 
> > implies that one TDMR could cover multiple e820 RAM entries.  If a RAM
> > entry spans the 1GB boundary and the former part is already covered by
> > the previous TDMR, just create a new TDMR for the latter part.
> > 
> > TDX only supports a limited number of TDMRs (currently 64).  Abort the
> > TDMR construction process when the number of TDMRs exceeds this
> > limitation.
> 
> ... and what does this *MEAN*?  Is TDX disabled?  Does it throw away the
> RAM?  Does it eat puppies?

How about:

	TDX only supports a limited number of TDMRs.  Simply return error when
	the number of TDMRs exceeds the limitation.  TDX is disabled in this
	case.

> 
> >  arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c | 138 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 138 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c b/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c
> > index 6b0c51aaa7f2..82534e70df96 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/virt/vmx/tdx/tdx.c
> > @@ -54,6 +54,18 @@
> >  		((u32)(((_keyid_part) & 0xffffffffull) + 1))
> >  #define TDX_KEYID_NUM(_keyid_part)	((u32)((_keyid_part) >> 32))
> >  
> > +/* TDMR must be 1gb aligned */
> > +#define TDMR_ALIGNMENT		BIT_ULL(30)
> > +#define TDMR_PFN_ALIGNMENT	(TDMR_ALIGNMENT >> PAGE_SHIFT)
> > +
> > +/* Align up and down the address to TDMR boundary */
> > +#define TDMR_ALIGN_DOWN(_addr)	ALIGN_DOWN((_addr), TDMR_ALIGNMENT)
> > +#define TDMR_ALIGN_UP(_addr)	ALIGN((_addr), TDMR_ALIGNMENT)
> > +
> > +/* TDMR's start and end address */
> > +#define TDMR_START(_tdmr)	((_tdmr)->base)
> > +#define TDMR_END(_tdmr)		((_tdmr)->base + (_tdmr)->size)
> 
> Make these 'static inline's please.  #defines are only for constants or
> things that can't use real functions.

OK.

> 
> >  /*
> >   * TDX module status during initialization
> >   */
> > @@ -813,6 +825,44 @@ static int e820_check_against_cmrs(void)
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > +/* The starting offset of reserved areas within TDMR_INFO */
> > +#define TDMR_RSVD_START		64
> 
> 				^ extra whitespace

Will remove.

> 
> > +static struct tdmr_info *__alloc_tdmr(void)
> > +{
> > +	int tdmr_sz;
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * TDMR_INFO's actual size depends on maximum number of reserved
> > +	 * areas that one TDMR supports.
> > +	 */
> > +	tdmr_sz = TDMR_RSVD_START + tdx_sysinfo.max_reserved_per_tdmr *
> > +		sizeof(struct tdmr_reserved_area);
> 
> You have a structure for this.  I know this because it's the return type
> of the function.  You have TDMR_RSVD_START available via the structure
> itself.  So, derive that 64 either via:
> 
> 	sizeof(struct tdmr_info)
> 
> or,
> 
> 	offsetof(struct tdmr_info, reserved_areas);
> 
> Which would make things look like this:
> 
> 	tdmr_base_sz = sizeof(struct tdmr_info);
> 	tdmr_reserved_area_sz = sizeof(struct tdmr_reserved_area) *
> 				tdx_sysinfo.max_reserved_per_tdmr;
> 
> 	tdmr_sz = tdmr_base_sz + tdmr_reserved_area_sz;
> 
> Could you explain why on earth you felt the need for the TDMR_RSVD_START
> #define?

Will use sizeof (struct tdmr_info).  Thanks for the tip.

> 
> > +	/*
> > +	 * TDX requires TDMR_INFO to be 512 aligned.  Always align up
> 
> Again, 512 what?  512 pages?  512 hippos?

Will change to 512-byte aligned.

> 
> > +	 * TDMR_INFO size to 512 so the memory allocated via kzalloc()
> > +	 * can meet the alignment requirement.
> > +	 */
> > +	tdmr_sz = ALIGN(tdmr_sz, TDMR_INFO_ALIGNMENT);
> > +
> > +	return kzalloc(tdmr_sz, GFP_KERNEL);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* Create a new TDMR at given index in the TDMR array */
> > +static struct tdmr_info *alloc_tdmr(struct tdmr_info **tdmr_array, int idx)
> > +{
> > +	struct tdmr_info *tdmr;
> > +
> > +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(tdmr_array[idx]))
> > +		return NULL;
> > +
> > +	tdmr = __alloc_tdmr();
> > +	tdmr_array[idx] = tdmr;
> > +
> > +	return tdmr;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void free_tdmrs(struct tdmr_info **tdmr_array, int tdmr_num)
> >  {
> >  	int i;
> > @@ -826,6 +876,89 @@ static void free_tdmrs(struct tdmr_info **tdmr_array, int tdmr_num)
> >  	}
> >  }
> >  
> > +/*
> > + * Create TDMRs to cover all RAM entries in e820_table.  The created
> > + * TDMRs are saved to @tdmr_array and @tdmr_num is set to the actual
> > + * number of TDMRs.  All entries in @tdmr_array must be initially NULL.
> > + */
> > +static int create_tdmrs(struct tdmr_info **tdmr_array, int *tdmr_num)
> > +{
> > +	struct tdmr_info *tdmr;
> > +	u64 start, end;
> > +	int i, tdmr_idx;
> > +	int ret = 0;
> > +
> > +	tdmr_idx = 0;
> > +	tdmr = alloc_tdmr(tdmr_array, 0);
> > +	if (!tdmr)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Loop over all RAM entries in e820 and create TDMRs to cover
> > +	 * them.  To keep it simple, always try to use one TDMR to cover
> > +	 * one RAM entry.
> > +	 */
> > +	e820_for_each_mem(i, start, end) {
> > +		start = TDMR_ALIGN_DOWN(start);
> > +		end = TDMR_ALIGN_UP(end);
> 			    ^ vertically align those ='s, please.

OK.

> 
> 
> > +		/*
> > +		 * If the current TDMR's size hasn't been initialized, it
> > +		 * is a new allocated TDMR to cover the new RAM entry.
> > +		 * Otherwise the current TDMR already covers the previous
> > +		 * RAM entry.  In the latter case, check whether the
> > +		 * current RAM entry has been fully or partially covered
> > +		 * by the current TDMR, since TDMR is 1G aligned.
> > +		 */
> > +		if (tdmr->size) {
> > +			/*
> > +			 * Loop to next RAM entry if the current entry
> > +			 * is already fully covered by the current TDMR.
> > +			 */
> > +			if (end <= TDMR_END(tdmr))
> > +				continue;
> 
> This loop is actually pretty well commented and looks OK.  The
> TDMR_END() construct even adds to readability.  *BUT*, the
> 
> > +			/*
> > +			 * If part of current RAM entry has already been
> > +			 * covered by current TDMR, skip the already
> > +			 * covered part.
> > +			 */
> > +			if (start < TDMR_END(tdmr))
> > +				start = TDMR_END(tdmr);
> > +
> > +			/*
> > +			 * Create a new TDMR to cover the current RAM
> > +			 * entry, or the remaining part of it.
> > +			 */
> > +			tdmr_idx++;
> > +			if (tdmr_idx >= tdx_sysinfo.max_tdmrs) {
> > +				ret = -E2BIG;
> > +				goto err;
> > +			}
> > +			tdmr = alloc_tdmr(tdmr_array, tdmr_idx);
> > +			if (!tdmr) {
> > +				ret = -ENOMEM;
> > +				goto err;
> > +			}
> 
> This is a bit verbose for this loop.  Why not just hide the 'max_tdmrs'
> inside the alloc_tdmr() function?  That will make this loop smaller and
> easier to read.

Based on suggestion, I'll change to use alloc_pages_exact() to allocate those
TDMRs at once, so no need to allocate for each TDMR again here.  I'll remove the
alloc_tdmr() but keep the max_tdmrs check here.
 


-- 
Thanks,
-Kai