From: <leonid.moiseichuk@nokia.com>
To: <penberg@kernel.org>, <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: <rhod@redhat.com>, <riel@redhat.com>, <minchan@kernel.org>,
<linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>, <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
<rientjes@google.com>, <kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>,
<hannes@cmpxchg.org>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
<kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC 1/3] /dev/low_mem_notify
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 08:19:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <84FF21A720B0874AA94B46D76DB9826904562B60@008-AM1MPN1-003.mgdnok.nokia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1327421440.13624.30.camel@jaguar>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Pekka Enberg [mailto:penberg@kernel.org]
> Sent: 24 January, 2012 18:11
> To: Marcelo Tosatti
....
> On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 13:38 -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > Having userspace specify the "sample period" for low memory
> > notification makes no sense. The frequency of notifications is a
> > function of the memory pressure.
>
> Sure, it makes sense to autotune sample period. I don't see the problem
> with letting userspace decide it for themselves if they want to.
>
> Pekka
Good point, but you must take into account that reaction time in user-space depends how SW stack is organized.
So for some components 1s is good enough update time, for another cases 10ms.
If changes on VM happened too often they had no sense for user-space.
Thus from practical point of view having sampling period is not a bad idea.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-25 8:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-17 8:13 [RFC 0/3] low memory notify Minchan Kim
2012-01-17 8:13 ` [RFC 1/3] /dev/low_mem_notify Minchan Kim
2012-01-17 9:27 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-01-17 16:35 ` Rik van Riel
2012-01-17 18:51 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-01-17 19:30 ` Rik van Riel
2012-01-17 19:49 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-01-17 19:54 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-01-17 19:57 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-01-17 23:20 ` Minchan Kim
2012-01-18 7:16 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-01-18 7:49 ` Minchan Kim
2012-01-18 9:06 ` leonid.moiseichuk
2012-01-18 9:15 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-01-18 9:41 ` leonid.moiseichuk
2012-01-18 10:40 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-01-18 10:44 ` leonid.moiseichuk
2012-01-18 23:34 ` Ronen Hod
2012-01-19 7:25 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-01-19 9:05 ` Ronen Hod
2012-01-19 9:10 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-01-19 9:20 ` Ronen Hod
2012-01-19 10:53 ` leonid.moiseichuk
2012-01-19 11:07 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-01-19 11:54 ` leonid.moiseichuk
2012-01-19 11:59 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-01-19 12:06 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-01-24 15:38 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-01-24 16:08 ` Ronen Hod
2012-01-24 18:10 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-01-25 8:52 ` Ronen Hod
2012-01-25 10:12 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-01-25 10:48 ` Ronen Hod
2012-01-26 16:17 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-01-24 16:10 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-01-24 18:29 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-01-25 8:19 ` leonid.moiseichuk [this message]
2012-01-19 7:34 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-01-24 16:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-01-18 14:30 ` Rik van Riel
2012-01-18 15:29 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-01-24 15:40 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-01-24 16:01 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-01-24 16:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-01-24 18:32 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2012-01-24 21:57 ` Jonathan Corbet
2012-01-17 9:45 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-01-17 8:13 ` [RFC 2/3] vmscan hook Minchan Kim
2012-01-17 8:39 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-01-17 9:13 ` Minchan Kim
2012-01-17 10:05 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-01-17 23:08 ` Minchan Kim
2012-01-18 0:18 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-01-18 14:17 ` Rik van Riel
2012-01-19 2:25 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-01-19 14:42 ` Rik van Riel
2012-01-20 0:24 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2012-01-17 8:13 ` [RFC 3/3] test program Minchan Kim
2012-01-17 14:38 ` [RFC 0/3] low memory notify Colin Walters
2012-01-17 15:04 ` Pekka Enberg
2012-01-17 16:44 ` Rik van Riel
2012-01-17 17:16 ` Olof Johansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=84FF21A720B0874AA94B46D76DB9826904562B60@008-AM1MPN1-003.mgdnok.nokia.com \
--to=leonid.moiseichuk@nokia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=rhod@redhat.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).