[BUG]Uncalibrated TSC is not accurate enough as a time keeper

[BUG]Uncalibrated TSC is not accurate enough as a time keeper

[Da Shi Cao]

The cpu_khz and tsc_khz are now read directly by the cpuid
instruction, and they are deemed to be very accurate. But this is not
the case in our situation. The OS time lags behind about 8 seconds per
hour. The CPU information is as follows:
processor       : 0
vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
cpu family      : 6
model           : 85
model name      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 6140 CPU @ 2.30GHz
stepping        : 4
microcode       : 0x200004d
cpu MHz         : 2300.000
cache size      : 25344 KB
physical id     : 0
siblings        : 36
core id         : 0
cpu cores       : 18
apicid          : 0
initial apicid  : 0
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 22
It is this "cpuid level 22" that makes the kernel 4.14 to read both
cpu_khz and tsc_khz directly by instruction "cpuid", and the TSC is
thought to be very accurate, but in fact it is not.
------------
* TSC frequency determined by CPUID is a "hardware reported"
* frequency and is the most accurate one so far we have. This
* is considered a known frequency.
+*
+*  The assumption may not be valid!
+*
*/
-  setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_TSC_KNOWN_FREQ);

Re: [BUG]Uncalibrated TSC is not accurate enough as a time keeper

[Florian Weimer]

* Da Shi Cao:

> The cpu_khz and tsc_khz are now read directly by the cpuid
> instruction, and they are deemed to be very accurate. But this is not
> the case in our situation. The OS time lags behind about 8 seconds per
> hour. The CPU information is as follows:

Is virtualization involved?  Do you use a vendor kernel?

Note that <linux-x86_64@vger.kernel.org> is more or less dead, and
your message to linux-kernel might get lost in the flood.