From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
To: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@gmail.com>,
jbaron@akamai.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linuxfoundation.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/21] dynamic_debug cleanups, query features, export
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 22:05:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9d0900db-5480-cdc9-88e1-92035259fc43@rasmusvillemoes.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200617162536.611386-1-jim.cromie@gmail.com>
On 17/06/2020 18.25, Jim Cromie wrote:
> this is v3, changes from previous:
> - moved non-controversial commits up front, refactors to help this.
> - a few more minor cleanups
> - left out the WIP patches
> - export ddebug_exec_queries()
> - accept file=foo:func only, not module:foo
> - varname changes
>
> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200613155738.2249399-1-jim.cromie@gmail.com/
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200605162645.289174-1-jim.cromie@gmail.com/
>
> Patchset starts with 11 cleanups;
> - change section name from vague "__verbose" to "__dyndbg"
> - cleaner docs, drop obsolete comment & useless debug prints,
> refine verbosity, fix a BUG_ON, ram reporting miscounts. etc..
So I haven't been following too closely, but I'm also a bit skeptical
about the new custom flag thing. OTOH, I'd really like to see those
first cleanups go in soon, especially patch 6 - which not only makes the
ram use a bit more accurate, it also avoids ~10000 calls of strlen() on
cache-cold memory during boot.
So, FWIW, you have my Acked-by for patches 1 through 11, and I hope
those can be picked up before the next merge window. But the remaining
ones seem to still require some discussion.
Rasmus
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-17 20:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-17 16:25 [PATCH v3 00/21] dynamic_debug cleanups, query features, export Jim Cromie
2020-06-17 16:25 ` [PATCH v3 01/21] dyndbg-docs: eschew file /full/path query in docs Jim Cromie
2020-06-17 16:25 ` [PATCH v3 02/21] dyndbg-docs: initialization is done early, not arch Jim Cromie
2020-06-17 16:25 ` [PATCH v3 03/21] dyndbg: drop obsolete comment on ddebug_proc_open Jim Cromie
2020-06-17 16:25 ` [PATCH v3 04/21] dyndbg: refine debug verbosity; 1 is basic, 2 more chatty Jim Cromie
2020-06-17 16:25 ` [PATCH v3 05/21] dyndbg: rename __verbose section to __dyndbg Jim Cromie
2020-06-17 16:25 ` [PATCH v3 06/21] dyndbg: fix overcounting of ram used by dyndbg Jim Cromie
2020-06-17 16:25 ` [PATCH v3 07/21] dyndbg: fix a BUG_ON in ddebug_describe_flags Jim Cromie
2020-06-17 16:25 ` [PATCH v3 08/21] dyndbg: fix pr_err with empty string Jim Cromie
2020-06-17 16:25 ` [PATCH v3 09/21] dyndbg: prefer declarative init in caller, to memset in callee Jim Cromie
2020-06-17 16:25 ` [PATCH v3 10/21] dyndbg: make ddebug_tables list LIFO for add/remove_module Jim Cromie
2020-06-17 16:25 ` [PATCH v3 11/21] dyndbg: use gcc ?: to reduce word count Jim Cromie
2020-06-17 16:25 ` [PATCH v3 12/21] dyndbg: refactor parse_linerange out of ddebug_parse_query Jim Cromie
2020-06-17 16:25 ` [PATCH v3 13/21] dyndbg: accept 'file foo.c:func1' and 'file foo.c:10-100' Jim Cromie
2020-06-17 16:25 ` [PATCH v3 14/21] dyndbg: accept query terms like file=bar and module=foo Jim Cromie
2020-06-18 22:25 ` jim.cromie
2020-06-17 16:25 ` [PATCH v3 14/21] dyndbg: accept query terms like file=bar module=foo Jim Cromie
2020-06-17 16:25 ` [PATCH v3 14/21] dyndbg: accept query terms like module:foo and file=bar Jim Cromie
2020-06-17 16:25 ` [PATCH v3 15/21] dyndbg: export ddebug_exec_queries Jim Cromie
2020-06-17 16:25 ` [PATCH v3 16/21] dyndbg: combine flags & mask into a struct, simplify with it Jim Cromie
2020-06-17 16:25 ` [PATCH v3 17/21] dyndbg: refactor ddebug_read_flags out of ddebug_parse_flags Jim Cromie
2020-06-17 16:25 ` [PATCH v3 18/21] dyndbg: add filter channel to the internals Jim Cromie
2020-06-17 16:25 ` [PATCH v3 19/21] dyndbg: extend ddebug_parse_flags to accept optional leading filter-flags Jim Cromie
2020-06-18 12:44 ` Petr Mladek
2020-06-18 14:54 ` jim.cromie
2020-06-18 16:01 ` Petr Mladek
2020-06-17 16:25 ` [PATCH v3 20/21] dyndbg: add user-flag, negating-flags, and filtering on flags Jim Cromie
2020-06-17 22:13 ` Joe Perches
2020-06-17 22:57 ` jim.cromie
2020-06-18 16:19 ` Petr Mladek
2020-06-18 17:40 ` Petr Mladek
2020-06-18 18:17 ` Jason Baron
2020-06-18 19:11 ` jim.cromie
2020-06-18 19:40 ` Jason Baron
2020-06-18 21:31 ` jim.cromie
2020-06-18 22:34 ` Stanimir Varbanov
2020-06-18 22:48 ` jim.cromie
2020-06-19 16:07 ` Jason Baron
2020-06-19 7:45 ` Petr Mladek
2020-06-19 8:10 ` Petr Mladek
2020-06-19 8:34 ` Greg KH
2020-06-18 18:15 ` jim.cromie
2020-06-17 16:25 ` [PATCH v3 21/21] dyndbg: allow negating flag-chars in modifier flags Jim Cromie
2020-06-17 20:05 ` Rasmus Villemoes [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9d0900db-5480-cdc9-88e1-92035259fc43@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--to=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=akpm@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
--cc=jim.cromie@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).