linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: "Alexandru Ardelean" <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-iio <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Lars-Peter Clausen" <lars@metafoo.de>,
	"Hennerich, Michael" <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
	"Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@kernel.org>,
	"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
	"Bogdan, Dragos" <dragos.bogdan@analog.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/11] iio: buffer: group attr count and attr alloc
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 10:12:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+U=DsotfJ5A44CWtdXW=QYzz3ApvLaUK2PqH=Cs3FdqFJVLEQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210204174942.000013b3@Huawei.com>

On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 7:57 PM Jonathan Cameron
<Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 16:50:59 +0200
> Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com> wrote:
>
> > If we want to merge the attributes of the buffer/ and scan_elements/
> > directories, we'll need to count all attributes first, then (depending on
> > the attribute group) either allocate 2 attribute groups, or a single one.
>
> Probably want to note why we might want to do 2 or 1 group here as it
> sounds weird without knowing where this is going.

ack

>
> >
> > This change moves the allocation of the buffer/ attributes closer to the
> > allocation of the scan_elements/ attributes to make grouping easier.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
> This is fine, but one comment on a possible tidy up for another day inline.
>
> Jonathan
>
> > ---
> >  drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++---------------
> >  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> > index cc846988fdb9..23f22be62cc7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> > @@ -1257,41 +1257,16 @@ static int __iio_buffer_alloc_sysfs_and_mask(struct iio_buffer *buffer,
> >  {
> >       struct iio_dev_attr *p;
> >       struct attribute **attr;
> > -     int ret, i, attrn, attrcount;
> > +     int ret, i, attrn, scan_el_attrcount, buffer_attrcount;
> >       const struct iio_chan_spec *channels;
> >
> > -     attrcount = 0;
> > +     buffer_attrcount = 0;
> >       if (buffer->attrs) {
> > -             while (buffer->attrs[attrcount] != NULL)
> > -                     attrcount++;
> > +             while (buffer->attrs[buffer_attrcount] != NULL)
> > +                     buffer_attrcount++;
> >       }
> >
> > -     attr = kcalloc(attrcount + ARRAY_SIZE(iio_buffer_attrs) + 1,
> > -                    sizeof(struct attribute *), GFP_KERNEL);
> > -     if (!attr)
> > -             return -ENOMEM;
> > -
> > -     memcpy(attr, iio_buffer_attrs, sizeof(iio_buffer_attrs));
> > -     if (!buffer->access->set_length)
> > -             attr[0] = &dev_attr_length_ro.attr;
> > -
> > -     if (buffer->access->flags & INDIO_BUFFER_FLAG_FIXED_WATERMARK)
> > -             attr[2] = &dev_attr_watermark_ro.attr;
> > -
> > -     if (buffer->attrs)
> > -             memcpy(&attr[ARRAY_SIZE(iio_buffer_attrs)], buffer->attrs,
> > -                    sizeof(struct attribute *) * attrcount);
> > -
> > -     attr[attrcount + ARRAY_SIZE(iio_buffer_attrs)] = NULL;
> > -
> > -     buffer->buffer_group.name = "buffer";
> > -     buffer->buffer_group.attrs = attr;
> > -
> > -     ret = iio_device_register_sysfs_group(indio_dev, &buffer->buffer_group);
> > -     if (ret)
> > -             goto error_free_buffer_attrs;
> > -
> > -     attrcount = 0;
> > +     scan_el_attrcount = 0;
> >       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&buffer->scan_el_dev_attr_list);
> >       channels = indio_dev->channels;
> >       if (channels) {
> > @@ -1304,7 +1279,7 @@ static int __iio_buffer_alloc_sysfs_and_mask(struct iio_buffer *buffer,
> >                                                        &channels[i]);
> >                       if (ret < 0)
> >                               goto error_cleanup_dynamic;
> > -                     attrcount += ret;
> > +                     scan_el_attrcount += ret;
> >                       if (channels[i].type == IIO_TIMESTAMP)
> >                               indio_dev->scan_index_timestamp =
> >                                       channels[i].scan_index;
> > @@ -1319,9 +1294,37 @@ static int __iio_buffer_alloc_sysfs_and_mask(struct iio_buffer *buffer,
> >               }
> >       }
> >
> > +     attr = kcalloc(buffer_attrcount + ARRAY_SIZE(iio_buffer_attrs) + 1,
> > +                    sizeof(struct attribute *), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +     if (!attr) {
> > +             ret = -ENOMEM;
> > +             goto error_free_scan_mask;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     memcpy(attr, iio_buffer_attrs, sizeof(iio_buffer_attrs));
> > +     if (!buffer->access->set_length)
> > +             attr[0] = &dev_attr_length_ro.attr;
> > +
> > +     if (buffer->access->flags & INDIO_BUFFER_FLAG_FIXED_WATERMARK)
> > +             attr[2] = &dev_attr_watermark_ro.attr;
>
> Again a comment for the future  rather than now, but when we are copying
> 4 items and then looking at whether to change 2 of them it might be cleaner
> to just set them directly!  Touch of bit rot here :)

So, I've been on-and-off about how to deal with this one.
I wanted to clean it in various ways using new kernel sysfs APIs.
Maybe, also remove the readonly variants and use the is_visible()
property to set RO/RW modes.
But I also came to the conclusion that this is an idea to address later.
Trying to address this early-on confused me with other overlapping changes.

>
> > +
> > +     if (buffer->attrs)
> > +             memcpy(&attr[ARRAY_SIZE(iio_buffer_attrs)], buffer->attrs,
> > +                    sizeof(struct attribute *) * buffer_attrcount);
> > +
> > +     buffer_attrcount += ARRAY_SIZE(iio_buffer_attrs);
> > +     attr[buffer_attrcount] = NULL;
> > +
> > +     buffer->buffer_group.name = "buffer";
> > +     buffer->buffer_group.attrs = attr;
> > +
> > +     ret = iio_device_register_sysfs_group(indio_dev, &buffer->buffer_group);
> > +     if (ret)
> > +             goto error_free_buffer_attrs;
> > +
> >       buffer->scan_el_group.name = iio_scan_elements_group_name;
> >
> > -     buffer->scan_el_group.attrs = kcalloc(attrcount + 1,
> > +     buffer->scan_el_group.attrs = kcalloc(scan_el_attrcount + 1,
> >                                             sizeof(buffer->scan_el_group.attrs[0]),
> >                                             GFP_KERNEL);
> >       if (buffer->scan_el_group.attrs == NULL) {
> > @@ -1341,12 +1344,12 @@ static int __iio_buffer_alloc_sysfs_and_mask(struct iio_buffer *buffer,
> >
> >  error_free_scan_el_attrs:
> >       kfree(buffer->scan_el_group.attrs);
> > +error_free_buffer_attrs:
> > +     kfree(buffer->buffer_group.attrs);
> >  error_free_scan_mask:
> >       bitmap_free(buffer->scan_mask);
> >  error_cleanup_dynamic:
> >       iio_free_chan_devattr_list(&buffer->scan_el_dev_attr_list);
> > -error_free_buffer_attrs:
> > -     kfree(buffer->buffer_group.attrs);
> >
> >       return ret;
> >  }
>

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-05  8:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-01 14:50 [PATCH v3 00/11] iio: core,buffer: add support for multiple IIO buffers per IIO device Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-01 14:50 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] docs: ioctl-number.rst: reserve IIO subsystem ioctl() space Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-04 17:06   ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-05  7:08     ` Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-01 14:50 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] iio: core: register chardev only if needed Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-04 17:17   ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-01 14:50 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] iio: core-trigger: make iio_device_register_trigger_consumer() an int return Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-01 14:50 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] iio: core: rework iio device group creation Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-04 17:32   ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-05  7:32     ` Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-01 14:50 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] iio: buffer: group attr count and attr alloc Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-04 17:49   ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-05  8:12     ` Alexandru Ardelean [this message]
2021-02-05 12:33       ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-01 14:51 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] iio: core: merge buffer/ & scan_elements/ attributes Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-01 20:02   ` kernel test robot
2021-02-02  6:07   ` Dan Carpenter
2021-02-03 10:02   ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-02-04 13:41     ` Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-05 11:07       ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-02-01 14:51 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] iio: add reference to iio buffer on iio_dev_attr Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-04 18:09   ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-05  8:26     ` Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-01 14:51 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] iio: buffer: wrap all buffer attributes into iio_dev_attr Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-04 18:23   ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-05  9:17     ` Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-05 12:39       ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-05 12:57         ` Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-06 14:46           ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-01 14:51 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] iio: core: wrap iio device & buffer into struct for character devices Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-01 14:51 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] iio: buffer: introduce support for attaching more IIO buffers Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-04 18:34   ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-05  9:32     ` Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-01 14:51 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] iio: buffer: add ioctl() to support opening extra buffers for IIO device Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-04 19:00   ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-05  9:51     ` Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-05 12:44       ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-05 12:48         ` Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-06 14:48           ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CA+U=DsotfJ5A44CWtdXW=QYzz3ApvLaUK2PqH=Cs3FdqFJVLEQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=ardeleanalex@gmail.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
    --cc=alexandru.ardelean@analog.com \
    --cc=dragos.bogdan@analog.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).