From: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: "Alexandru Ardelean" <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-iio <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>,
"Lars-Peter Clausen" <lars@metafoo.de>,
"Hennerich, Michael" <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>,
"Jonathan Cameron" <jic23@kernel.org>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
"Bogdan, Dragos" <dragos.bogdan@analog.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/11] iio: buffer: introduce support for attaching more IIO buffers
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 11:32:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+U=DsqfyuiLiY2dhFD723VwiL4ABg-cBfg=1tnDWRn=yN-arg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210204183433.000079e3@Huawei.com>
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 8:39 PM Jonathan Cameron
<Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 16:51:04 +0200
> Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com> wrote:
>
> > With this change, calling iio_device_attach_buffer() will actually attach
> > more buffers.
> > Right now this doesn't do any validation of whether a buffer is attached
> > twice; maybe that can be added later (if needed). Attaching a buffer more
> > than once should yield noticeably bad results.
> >
> > The first buffer is the legacy buffer, so a reference is kept to it.
> >
> > At this point, accessing the data for the extra buffers (that are added
> > after the first one) isn't possible yet.
> >
> > The iio_device_attach_buffer() is also changed to return an error code,
> > which for now is -ENOMEM if the array could not be realloc-ed for more
> > buffers.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
> A few minor comments inline.
>
> Thanks,
>
> J
> > ---
> > drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> > include/linux/iio/buffer.h | 4 +-
> > include/linux/iio/buffer_impl.h | 3 ++
> > include/linux/iio/iio-opaque.h | 4 ++
> > 4 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> > index 692f721588e2..a69bb705d173 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/industrialio-buffer.c
> > @@ -1445,11 +1445,21 @@ static int __iio_buffer_alloc_sysfs_and_mask(struct iio_buffer *buffer,
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > +static void __iio_buffer_free_sysfs_and_mask(struct iio_buffer *buffer)
> > +{
> > + bitmap_free(buffer->scan_mask);
> > + kfree(buffer->buffer_group.name);
> > + kfree(buffer->buffer_group.attrs);
> > + iio_free_chan_devattr_list(&buffer->buffer_attr_list);
> > +}
> > +
> > int iio_buffer_alloc_sysfs_and_mask(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> > {
> > + struct iio_dev_opaque *iio_dev_opaque = to_iio_dev_opaque(indio_dev);
> > struct iio_buffer *buffer = indio_dev->buffer;
> > const struct iio_chan_spec *channels;
> > - int i;
> > + int unwind_idx;
> > + int ret, i;
> >
> > channels = indio_dev->channels;
> > if (channels) {
> > @@ -1463,27 +1473,45 @@ int iio_buffer_alloc_sysfs_and_mask(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> > if (!buffer)
> > return 0;
> >
> > - return __iio_buffer_alloc_sysfs_and_mask(buffer, indio_dev, 0);
> > -}
> > + for (i = 0; i < iio_dev_opaque->attached_buffers_cnt; i++) {
> > + buffer = iio_dev_opaque->attached_buffers[i];
> > + ret = __iio_buffer_alloc_sysfs_and_mask(buffer, indio_dev, i);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + unwind_idx = i;
> Gut feeling would be to use i instead of introducing unwind_idx, but it
> doesn't really matter if you prefer this.
I thought about leaving 'i' here, but then in the next patch a
block/patch is added that makes using 'i' less obvious/clean.
So, unwind_idx is clearer after more code is added after this block.
>
> > + goto error_unwind_sysfs_and_mask;
> > + }
> > + }
> >
> > -static void __iio_buffer_free_sysfs_and_mask(struct iio_buffer *buffer)
> > -{
> > - bitmap_free(buffer->scan_mask);
> > - kfree(buffer->buffer_group.name);
> > - kfree(buffer->buffer_group.attrs);
> > - iio_free_chan_devattr_list(&buffer->buffer_attr_list);
>
> could you put this move in a precursor patch. It's making a mess
> of the diff and hence this harder to review than it should be.
ack
>
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > +error_unwind_sysfs_and_mask:
> > + for (; unwind_idx >= 0; unwind_idx--) {
> > + buffer = iio_dev_opaque->attached_buffers[unwind_idx];
> > + __iio_buffer_free_sysfs_and_mask(buffer);
> > + }
> > + kfree(iio_dev_opaque->attached_buffers);
> > + iio_dev_opaque->attached_buffers = NULL;
> > + return ret;
> > }
> >
> > void iio_buffer_free_sysfs_and_mask(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> > {
> > + struct iio_dev_opaque *iio_dev_opaque = to_iio_dev_opaque(indio_dev);
> > struct iio_buffer *buffer = indio_dev->buffer;
> > + int i;
> >
> > if (!buffer)
> > return;
> >
> > iio_buffer_unregister_legacy_sysfs_groups(indio_dev);
> >
> > - __iio_buffer_free_sysfs_and_mask(buffer);
> > + for (i = iio_dev_opaque->attached_buffers_cnt - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> > + buffer = iio_dev_opaque->attached_buffers[i];
> > + __iio_buffer_free_sysfs_and_mask(buffer);
> > + }
> > +
> > + kfree(iio_dev_opaque->attached_buffers);
> > + iio_dev_opaque->attached_buffers = NULL;
>
> For places where we set freed pointers to NULL, I'd like a comment on why.
> Usually it makes me a bit worried we are doing something less than tidy.
ack;
will remove;
>
> > }
> >
> > /**
> > @@ -1601,13 +1629,35 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iio_buffer_put);
> > * @indio_dev: The device the buffer should be attached to
> > * @buffer: The buffer to attach to the device
> > *
> > + * Return 0 if successful, negative if error.
> > + *
> > * This function attaches a buffer to a IIO device. The buffer stays attached to
> > - * the device until the device is freed. The function should only be called at
> > - * most once per device.
> > + * the device until the device is freed. For legacy reasons, the first attached
> > + * buffer will also be assigned to 'indio_dev->buffer'.
> > */
> > -void iio_device_attach_buffer(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > - struct iio_buffer *buffer)
> > +int iio_device_attach_buffer(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > + struct iio_buffer *buffer)
> > {
> > - indio_dev->buffer = iio_buffer_get(buffer);
> > + struct iio_dev_opaque *iio_dev_opaque = to_iio_dev_opaque(indio_dev);
> > + struct iio_buffer **new, **old = iio_dev_opaque->attached_buffers;
> > + unsigned int cnt = iio_dev_opaque->attached_buffers_cnt;
> > +
> > + cnt++;
> > +
> > + new = krealloc(old, sizeof(*new) * cnt, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!new)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > + iio_dev_opaque->attached_buffers = new;
> > +
> > + buffer = iio_buffer_get(buffer);
> > +
> > + /* first buffer is legacy; attach it to the IIO device directly */
> > + if (!indio_dev->buffer)
> > + indio_dev->buffer = buffer;
> > +
> > + iio_dev_opaque->attached_buffers[cnt - 1] = buffer;
> > + iio_dev_opaque->attached_buffers_cnt = cnt;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iio_device_attach_buffer);
> > diff --git a/include/linux/iio/buffer.h b/include/linux/iio/buffer.h
> > index 8febc23f5f26..b6928ac5c63d 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/iio/buffer.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/iio/buffer.h
> > @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static inline int iio_push_to_buffers_with_timestamp(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > bool iio_validate_scan_mask_onehot(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > const unsigned long *mask);
> >
> > -void iio_device_attach_buffer(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > - struct iio_buffer *buffer);
> > +int iio_device_attach_buffer(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> > + struct iio_buffer *buffer);
> >
> > #endif /* _IIO_BUFFER_GENERIC_H_ */
> > diff --git a/include/linux/iio/buffer_impl.h b/include/linux/iio/buffer_impl.h
> > index 41044320e581..768b90c64412 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/iio/buffer_impl.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/iio/buffer_impl.h
> > @@ -112,6 +112,9 @@ struct iio_buffer {
> > /* @demux_bounce: Buffer for doing gather from incoming scan. */
> > void *demux_bounce;
> >
> > + /* @attached_entry: Entry in the devices list of buffers attached by the driver. */
> > + struct list_head attached_entry;
> > +
> > /* @buffer_list: Entry in the devices list of current buffers. */
> > struct list_head buffer_list;
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/iio/iio-opaque.h b/include/linux/iio/iio-opaque.h
> > index 3e4c3cd248fd..c909835b6247 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/iio/iio-opaque.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/iio/iio-opaque.h
> > @@ -7,6 +7,8 @@
> > * struct iio_dev_opaque - industrial I/O device opaque information
> > * @indio_dev: public industrial I/O device information
> > * @event_interface: event chrdevs associated with interrupt lines
> > + * @attached_buffers: array of buffers statically attached by the driver
> > + * @attached_buffers_cnt: number of buffers in the array of statically attached buffers
> > * @buffer_list: list of all buffers currently attached
> > * @channel_attr_list: keep track of automatically created channel
> > * attributes
> > @@ -24,6 +26,8 @@
> > struct iio_dev_opaque {
> > struct iio_dev indio_dev;
> > struct iio_event_interface *event_interface;
> > + struct iio_buffer **attached_buffers;
> > + unsigned int attached_buffers_cnt;
> > struct list_head buffer_list;
> > struct list_head channel_attr_list;
> > struct attribute_group chan_attr_group;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-05 9:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-01 14:50 [PATCH v3 00/11] iio: core,buffer: add support for multiple IIO buffers per IIO device Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-01 14:50 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] docs: ioctl-number.rst: reserve IIO subsystem ioctl() space Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-04 17:06 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-05 7:08 ` Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-01 14:50 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] iio: core: register chardev only if needed Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-04 17:17 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-01 14:50 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] iio: core-trigger: make iio_device_register_trigger_consumer() an int return Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-01 14:50 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] iio: core: rework iio device group creation Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-04 17:32 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-05 7:32 ` Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-01 14:50 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] iio: buffer: group attr count and attr alloc Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-04 17:49 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-05 8:12 ` Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-05 12:33 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-01 14:51 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] iio: core: merge buffer/ & scan_elements/ attributes Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-01 20:02 ` kernel test robot
2021-02-02 6:07 ` Dan Carpenter
2021-02-03 10:02 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-02-04 13:41 ` Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-05 11:07 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-02-01 14:51 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] iio: add reference to iio buffer on iio_dev_attr Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-04 18:09 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-05 8:26 ` Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-01 14:51 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] iio: buffer: wrap all buffer attributes into iio_dev_attr Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-04 18:23 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-05 9:17 ` Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-05 12:39 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-05 12:57 ` Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-06 14:46 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-01 14:51 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] iio: core: wrap iio device & buffer into struct for character devices Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-01 14:51 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] iio: buffer: introduce support for attaching more IIO buffers Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-04 18:34 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-05 9:32 ` Alexandru Ardelean [this message]
2021-02-01 14:51 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] iio: buffer: add ioctl() to support opening extra buffers for IIO device Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-04 19:00 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-05 9:51 ` Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-05 12:44 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-02-05 12:48 ` Alexandru Ardelean
2021-02-06 14:48 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CA+U=DsqfyuiLiY2dhFD723VwiL4ABg-cBfg=1tnDWRn=yN-arg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=ardeleanalex@gmail.com \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=Michael.Hennerich@analog.com \
--cc=alexandru.ardelean@analog.com \
--cc=dragos.bogdan@analog.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).