linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
	rgoldwyn@suse.com, hare <hare@suse.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@redhat.com>,
	rwright@hpe.com, Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>,
	Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.com>,
	martin.wilck@suse.com, Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	shuah@kernel.org, DSterba@suse.com,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
	Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@redhat.com>,
	Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan <subashab@codeaurora.org>,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Subject: Re: [RFC 10/10] kmod: add a sanity check on module loading
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 12:52:06 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAB=NE6UgFir2u2UKUSqoxFYyuY9rQyJAvifBGi3QU1u15J=ihQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87fuljjua3.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>

On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 6:53 PM, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
> Where does this NULL-deref is the module isn't correctly loaded?

No you are right, sorry -- I had confused a failure to mount over null
deref, my mistake.

>> *Iff* we want a sanity check to verify kmod's umh is not lying to us we
>> need to verify after 0 was returned that it was not lying to us. Since kmod
>> accepts aliases but find_modules_all() only works on the real module name a
>> validation check cannot happen when all you have are aliases.
>
> request_module() should block until resolution, but that's fundamentally
> a userspace problem.  Let's not paper over it in kernelspace.

OK -- if userspace messes up again it may be a bit hard to prove
unless we have a validation debug thing in place, would such a thing
in debug form be reasonable ?

>> Yes; the kallsyms code does this on Oops.  Not really a big issue in
>> practice, but a nice fix.
>>
>> Ok, will bundle into my queue.
>
> Please submit to Jessica for her module queue, as it's orthogonal
> AFAICT.

Will do.

>> I will note though that I still think there's a bug in this code --
>> upon a failure other "spinning" requests can fail, I believe this may
>> be due to not having another state or informing pending modules too
>> early of a failure but I haven't been able to prove this conjecture
>> yet.
>
> That's possible, but I can't see it from quickly re-checking the code.
>
> The module should be fully usable at this point; the module's init has
> been called successfully, so in the case of __get_fs_type() it should
> now succeed.  The module cleans up its init section, but that should be
> independent.
>
> If there is a race, it's likely to be when some other caller wakes the
> queue.  Moving the wakeup as soon as possible should make it easier to
> trigger:
>
> diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
> index f57dd63186e6..78bd89d41a22 100644
> --- a/kernel/module.c
> +++ b/kernel/module.c
> @@ -3397,6 +3397,7 @@ static noinline int do_init_module(struct module *mod)
>
>         /* Now it's a first class citizen! */
>         mod->state = MODULE_STATE_LIVE;
> +       wake_up_all(&module_wq);
>         blocking_notifier_call_chain(&module_notify_list,
>                                      MODULE_STATE_LIVE, mod);
>
> @@ -3445,7 +3446,6 @@ static noinline int do_init_module(struct module *mod)
>          */
>         call_rcu_sched(&freeinit->rcu, do_free_init);
>         mutex_unlock(&module_mutex);
> -       wake_up_all(&module_wq);
>
>         return 0;
>

Will give this a shot, thanks!

  Luis

  reply	other threads:[~2016-12-20 18:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-08 18:47 [RFC 00/10] kmod: stress test driver, few fixes and enhancements Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-12-08 18:47 ` [RFC 01/10] kmod: add test driver to stress test the module loader Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-12-08 20:24   ` Kees Cook
2016-12-13 21:10     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-12-16  7:41       ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-12-08 19:48 ` [RFC 02/10] module: fix memory leak on early load_module() failures Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-12-08 20:30   ` Kees Cook
2016-12-08 21:10     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-12-08 21:17       ` Kees Cook
2016-12-09 17:06   ` Miroslav Benes
2016-12-16  8:51     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-12-15 18:46   ` Aaron Tomlin
2016-12-08 19:48 ` [RFC 03/10] kmod: add dynamic max concurrent thread count Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-12-08 20:28   ` Kees Cook
2016-12-08 21:00     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-12-14 15:38   ` Petr Mladek
2016-12-16  8:39     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-01-10 19:24       ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-12-08 19:48 ` [RFC 04/10] kmod: provide wrappers for kmod_concurrent inc/dec Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-12-08 20:29   ` Kees Cook
2016-12-08 21:08     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-12-15 12:46       ` Petr Mladek
2016-12-16  8:05         ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-12-22  4:48           ` Jessica Yu
2017-01-06 20:54             ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-01-10 18:57           ` [RFC 04/10] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-01-11 20:08             ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-05-16 18:02               ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-05-18  2:37                 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-12-22  5:07   ` Jessica Yu
2017-01-10 20:28     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-12-08 19:48 ` [RFC 05/10] kmod: return -EBUSY if modprobe limit is reached Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-12-08 19:48 ` [RFC 06/10] kmod: provide sanity check on kmod_concurrent access Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-12-14 16:08   ` Petr Mladek
2016-12-14 17:12     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-12-15 12:57   ` Petr Mladek
2017-01-10 20:00     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-12-08 19:49 ` [RFC 07/10] kmod: use simplified rate limit printk Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-12-14 16:23   ` Petr Mladek
2016-12-14 16:41     ` Joe Perches
2016-12-16  8:44     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-12-08 19:49 ` [RFC 08/10] sysctl: add support for unsigned int properly Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-12-08 19:49 ` [RFC 09/10] kmod: add helpers for getting kmod count and limit Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-12-15 16:56   ` Petr Mladek
2016-12-16  7:57     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-01-11 18:27       ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-12-08 19:49 ` [RFC 10/10] kmod: add a sanity check on module loading Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-12-09 20:03   ` Martin Wilck
2016-12-09 20:56     ` Linus Torvalds
2016-12-15 18:08       ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-12-15  0:27   ` Rusty Russell
2016-12-16  8:31     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-12-17  3:54       ` Rusty Russell
     [not found]         ` <CAB=NE6VvuA9a6hf6yoopGfUxVJQM5HyV5bNzUdsEtUV0UhbG-g@mail.gmail.com>
2016-12-20  0:53           ` Rusty Russell
2016-12-20 18:52             ` Luis R. Rodriguez [this message]
2016-12-21  2:21               ` Rusty Russell
2016-12-21 13:08                 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-01-03  0:04                   ` Rusty Russell
2017-01-06 20:36                     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-01-06 21:53                       ` Jessica Yu
2017-01-09 20:27                         ` Luis R. Rodriguez
     [not found]                       ` <87bmvgax51.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
2017-01-09 19:56                         ` [RFC 10/10] " Luis R. Rodriguez
2017-01-06 21:03                     ` Jessica Yu
2017-01-04  2:47   ` Jessica Yu
2017-01-11 19:10 ` [RFC 00/10] kmod: stress test driver, few fixes and enhancements Luis R. Rodriguez

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAB=NE6UgFir2u2UKUSqoxFYyuY9rQyJAvifBGi3QU1u15J=ihQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=DSterba@suse.com \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=atomlin@redhat.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=fdmanana@suse.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.com \
    --cc=jeffm@suse.com \
    --cc=jeyu@redhat.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=martin.wilck@suse.com \
    --cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mmarek@suse.com \
    --cc=neilb@suse.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=rgoldwyn@suse.com \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=rwright@hpe.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=subashab@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=xypron.glpk@gmx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).