linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] mmc: host: dw_mmc-exynos: Add support for pinctrl
@ 2012-12-21 17:11 Dongjin Kim
  2012-12-31  2:59 ` Dongjin Kim
  2012-12-31  5:57 ` Thomas Abraham
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dongjin Kim @ 2012-12-21 17:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  Cc: Dongjin Kim, Chris Ball, Arnd Bergmann, Thomas Abraham,
	Will Newton, linux-mmc, linux-kernel

This patch adds support for pin configuration using pinctrl subsystem to
dw_mmc-exynos driver. The property 'wp-gpios' can be specified for write
protect but 'samsung,cd-pinmux-gpio' and gpios used for clock, command and
data lines will be ignored.

-. 'pinctrl-0' should specify pin control groups (clock, comand and data
    lines) used for this controller.
-. 'pinctrl-names' should contain only one value, 'default'.

Signed-off-by: Dongjin Kim <tobetter@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c |   44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
index 4d50da6..d1c9963 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
 #include <linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
 #include <linux/of_gpio.h>
+#include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h>
 
 #include "dw_mmc.h"
 #include "dw_mmc-pltfm.h"
@@ -49,6 +50,7 @@ struct dw_mci_exynos_priv_data {
 	u8				ciu_div;
 	u32				sdr_timing;
 	u32				ddr_timing;
+	struct pinctrl			*pctrl;
 };
 
 static struct dw_mci_exynos_compatible {
@@ -84,6 +86,10 @@ static int dw_mci_exynos_priv_init(struct dw_mci *host)
 			priv->ctrl_type = exynos_compat[idx].ctrl_type;
 	}
 
+	priv->pctrl = devm_pinctrl_get_select_default(host->dev);
+	if (IS_ERR(priv->pctrl))
+		dev_dbg(host->dev, "no pinctrl node\n");
+
 	host->priv = priv;
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -149,32 +155,19 @@ static int dw_mci_exynos_parse_dt(struct dw_mci *host)
 		return ret;
 
 	priv->ddr_timing = SDMMC_CLKSEL_TIMING(timing[0], timing[1], div);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
 static int dw_mci_exynos_setup_bus(struct dw_mci *host,
 				struct device_node *slot_np, u8 bus_width)
 {
+	struct dw_mci_exynos_priv_data *priv = host->priv;
 	int idx, gpio, ret;
 
 	if (!slot_np)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	/* cmd + clock + bus-width pins */
-	for (idx = 0; idx < NUM_PINS(bus_width); idx++) {
-		gpio = of_get_gpio(slot_np, idx);
-		if (!gpio_is_valid(gpio)) {
-			dev_err(host->dev, "invalid gpio: %d\n", gpio);
-			return -EINVAL;
-		}
-
-		ret = devm_gpio_request(host->dev, gpio, "dw-mci-bus");
-		if (ret) {
-			dev_err(host->dev, "gpio [%d] request failed\n", gpio);
-			return -EBUSY;
-		}
-	}
-
 	gpio = of_get_named_gpio(slot_np, "wp-gpios", 0);
 	if (gpio_is_valid(gpio)) {
 		if (devm_gpio_request(host->dev, gpio, "dw-mci-wp"))
@@ -185,9 +178,12 @@ static int dw_mci_exynos_setup_bus(struct dw_mci *host,
 		host->pdata->quirks |= DW_MCI_QUIRK_NO_WRITE_PROTECT;
 	}
 
-	if (host->pdata->quirks & DW_MCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION)
+	if (!IS_ERR(priv->pctrl))
 		return 0;
 
+	if (host->pdata->quirks & DW_MCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION)
+		goto setup_bus;
+
 	gpio = of_get_named_gpio(slot_np, "samsung,cd-pinmux-gpio", 0);
 	if (gpio_is_valid(gpio)) {
 		if (devm_gpio_request(host->dev, gpio, "dw-mci-cd"))
@@ -196,6 +192,22 @@ static int dw_mci_exynos_setup_bus(struct dw_mci *host,
 		dev_info(host->dev, "cd gpio not available");
 	}
 
+ setup_bus:
+	/* cmd + clock + bus-width pins */
+	for (idx = 0; idx < NUM_PINS(bus_width); idx++) {
+		gpio = of_get_gpio(slot_np, idx);
+		if (!gpio_is_valid(gpio)) {
+			dev_err(host->dev, "invalid gpio: %d\n", gpio);
+			return -EINVAL;
+		}
+
+		ret = devm_gpio_request(host->dev, gpio, "dw-mci-bus");
+		if (ret) {
+			dev_err(host->dev, "gpio [%d] request failed\n", gpio);
+			return -EBUSY;
+		}
+	}
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
1.7.9.5


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] mmc: host: dw_mmc-exynos: Add support for pinctrl
  2012-12-21 17:11 [PATCH] mmc: host: dw_mmc-exynos: Add support for pinctrl Dongjin Kim
@ 2012-12-31  2:59 ` Dongjin Kim
  2012-12-31  5:57 ` Thomas Abraham
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dongjin Kim @ 2012-12-31  2:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dongjin Kim
  Cc: Chris Ball, Arnd Bergmann, Thomas Abraham, Will Newton,
	linux-mmc, linux-kernel

Hi,

Does anyone have advice on this patch?

On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 2:11 AM, Dongjin Kim <tobetter@gmail.com> wrote:
> This patch adds support for pin configuration using pinctrl subsystem to
> dw_mmc-exynos driver. The property 'wp-gpios' can be specified for write
> protect but 'samsung,cd-pinmux-gpio' and gpios used for clock, command and
> data lines will be ignored.
>
> -. 'pinctrl-0' should specify pin control groups (clock, comand and data
>     lines) used for this controller.
> -. 'pinctrl-names' should contain only one value, 'default'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dongjin Kim <tobetter@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c |   44
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
> b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
> index 4d50da6..d1c9963 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>  #include <linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h>
>  #include <linux/of.h>
>  #include <linux/of_gpio.h>
> +#include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h>
>
>  #include "dw_mmc.h"
>  #include "dw_mmc-pltfm.h"
> @@ -49,6 +50,7 @@ struct dw_mci_exynos_priv_data {
>         u8                              ciu_div;
>         u32                             sdr_timing;
>         u32                             ddr_timing;
> +       struct pinctrl                  *pctrl;
>  };
>
>  static struct dw_mci_exynos_compatible {
> @@ -84,6 +86,10 @@ static int dw_mci_exynos_priv_init(struct dw_mci *host)
>                         priv->ctrl_type = exynos_compat[idx].ctrl_type;
>         }
>
> +       priv->pctrl = devm_pinctrl_get_select_default(host->dev);
> +       if (IS_ERR(priv->pctrl))
> +               dev_dbg(host->dev, "no pinctrl node\n");
> +
>         host->priv = priv;
>         return 0;
>  }
> @@ -149,32 +155,19 @@ static int dw_mci_exynos_parse_dt(struct dw_mci
> *host)
>                 return ret;
>
>         priv->ddr_timing = SDMMC_CLKSEL_TIMING(timing[0], timing[1], div);
> +
>         return 0;
>  }
>
>  static int dw_mci_exynos_setup_bus(struct dw_mci *host,
>                                 struct device_node *slot_np, u8 bus_width)
>  {
> +       struct dw_mci_exynos_priv_data *priv = host->priv;
>         int idx, gpio, ret;
>
>         if (!slot_np)
>                 return -EINVAL;
>
> -       /* cmd + clock + bus-width pins */
> -       for (idx = 0; idx < NUM_PINS(bus_width); idx++) {
> -               gpio = of_get_gpio(slot_np, idx);
> -               if (!gpio_is_valid(gpio)) {
> -                       dev_err(host->dev, "invalid gpio: %d\n", gpio);
> -                       return -EINVAL;
> -               }
> -
> -               ret = devm_gpio_request(host->dev, gpio, "dw-mci-bus");
> -               if (ret) {
> -                       dev_err(host->dev, "gpio [%d] request failed\n",
> gpio);
> -                       return -EBUSY;
> -               }
> -       }
> -
>         gpio = of_get_named_gpio(slot_np, "wp-gpios", 0);
>         if (gpio_is_valid(gpio)) {
>                 if (devm_gpio_request(host->dev, gpio, "dw-mci-wp"))
> @@ -185,9 +178,12 @@ static int dw_mci_exynos_setup_bus(struct dw_mci
> *host,
>                 host->pdata->quirks |= DW_MCI_QUIRK_NO_WRITE_PROTECT;
>         }
>
> -       if (host->pdata->quirks & DW_MCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION)
> +       if (!IS_ERR(priv->pctrl))
>                 return 0;
>
> +       if (host->pdata->quirks & DW_MCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION)
> +               goto setup_bus;
> +
>         gpio = of_get_named_gpio(slot_np, "samsung,cd-pinmux-gpio", 0);
>         if (gpio_is_valid(gpio)) {
>                 if (devm_gpio_request(host->dev, gpio, "dw-mci-cd"))
> @@ -196,6 +192,22 @@ static int dw_mci_exynos_setup_bus(struct dw_mci
> *host,
>                 dev_info(host->dev, "cd gpio not available");
>         }
>
> + setup_bus:
> +       /* cmd + clock + bus-width pins */
> +       for (idx = 0; idx < NUM_PINS(bus_width); idx++) {
> +               gpio = of_get_gpio(slot_np, idx);
> +               if (!gpio_is_valid(gpio)) {
> +                       dev_err(host->dev, "invalid gpio: %d\n", gpio);
> +                       return -EINVAL;
> +               }
> +
> +               ret = devm_gpio_request(host->dev, gpio, "dw-mci-bus");
> +               if (ret) {
> +                       dev_err(host->dev, "gpio [%d] request failed\n",
> gpio);
> +                       return -EBUSY;
> +               }
> +       }
> +
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] mmc: host: dw_mmc-exynos: Add support for pinctrl
  2012-12-21 17:11 [PATCH] mmc: host: dw_mmc-exynos: Add support for pinctrl Dongjin Kim
  2012-12-31  2:59 ` Dongjin Kim
@ 2012-12-31  5:57 ` Thomas Abraham
  2013-01-03 18:33   ` Dongjin Kim
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Abraham @ 2012-12-31  5:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dongjin Kim
  Cc: Chris Ball, Arnd Bergmann, Will Newton, linux-mmc, linux-kernel

On 21 December 2012 09:11, Dongjin Kim <tobetter@gmail.com> wrote:
> This patch adds support for pin configuration using pinctrl subsystem to
> dw_mmc-exynos driver. The property 'wp-gpios' can be specified for write
> protect but 'samsung,cd-pinmux-gpio' and gpios used for clock, command and
> data lines will be ignored.
>
> -. 'pinctrl-0' should specify pin control groups (clock, comand and data
>     lines) used for this controller.
> -. 'pinctrl-names' should contain only one value, 'default'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dongjin Kim <tobetter@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c |   44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
> index 4d50da6..d1c9963 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>  #include <linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h>
>  #include <linux/of.h>
>  #include <linux/of_gpio.h>
> +#include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h>
>
>  #include "dw_mmc.h"
>  #include "dw_mmc-pltfm.h"
> @@ -49,6 +50,7 @@ struct dw_mci_exynos_priv_data {
>         u8                              ciu_div;
>         u32                             sdr_timing;
>         u32                             ddr_timing;
> +       struct pinctrl                  *pctrl;
>  };
>
>  static struct dw_mci_exynos_compatible {
> @@ -84,6 +86,10 @@ static int dw_mci_exynos_priv_init(struct dw_mci *host)
>                         priv->ctrl_type = exynos_compat[idx].ctrl_type;
>         }
>
> +       priv->pctrl = devm_pinctrl_get_select_default(host->dev);
> +       if (IS_ERR(priv->pctrl))
> +               dev_dbg(host->dev, "no pinctrl node\n");
> +

This could have been handled in dw_mci_exynos_setup_bus function. And
we also need to check if this patch gets merged.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1870231/. If it gets merged, this
change can be avoided.

>         host->priv = priv;
>         return 0;
>  }
> @@ -149,32 +155,19 @@ static int dw_mci_exynos_parse_dt(struct dw_mci *host)
>                 return ret;
>
>         priv->ddr_timing = SDMMC_CLKSEL_TIMING(timing[0], timing[1], div);
> +
>         return 0;
>  }
>
>  static int dw_mci_exynos_setup_bus(struct dw_mci *host,
>                                 struct device_node *slot_np, u8 bus_width)
>  {
> +       struct dw_mci_exynos_priv_data *priv = host->priv;
>         int idx, gpio, ret;
>
>         if (!slot_np)
>                 return -EINVAL;
>
> -       /* cmd + clock + bus-width pins */
> -       for (idx = 0; idx < NUM_PINS(bus_width); idx++) {
> -               gpio = of_get_gpio(slot_np, idx);
> -               if (!gpio_is_valid(gpio)) {
> -                       dev_err(host->dev, "invalid gpio: %d\n", gpio);
> -                       return -EINVAL;
> -               }
> -
> -               ret = devm_gpio_request(host->dev, gpio, "dw-mci-bus");
> -               if (ret) {
> -                       dev_err(host->dev, "gpio [%d] request failed\n", gpio);
> -                       return -EBUSY;
> -               }
> -       }
> -
>         gpio = of_get_named_gpio(slot_np, "wp-gpios", 0);
>         if (gpio_is_valid(gpio)) {
>                 if (devm_gpio_request(host->dev, gpio, "dw-mci-wp"))
> @@ -185,9 +178,12 @@ static int dw_mci_exynos_setup_bus(struct dw_mci *host,
>                 host->pdata->quirks |= DW_MCI_QUIRK_NO_WRITE_PROTECT;
>         }
>
> -       if (host->pdata->quirks & DW_MCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION)
> +       if (!IS_ERR(priv->pctrl))
>                 return 0;
>
> +       if (host->pdata->quirks & DW_MCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION)
> +               goto setup_bus;
> +

Why do the entire bus setup if card detection is broken?

>         gpio = of_get_named_gpio(slot_np, "samsung,cd-pinmux-gpio", 0);
>         if (gpio_is_valid(gpio)) {
>                 if (devm_gpio_request(host->dev, gpio, "dw-mci-cd"))
> @@ -196,6 +192,22 @@ static int dw_mci_exynos_setup_bus(struct dw_mci *host,
>                 dev_info(host->dev, "cd gpio not available");
>         }
>
> + setup_bus:
> +       /* cmd + clock + bus-width pins */
> +       for (idx = 0; idx < NUM_PINS(bus_width); idx++) {
> +               gpio = of_get_gpio(slot_np, idx);
> +               if (!gpio_is_valid(gpio)) {
> +                       dev_err(host->dev, "invalid gpio: %d\n", gpio);
> +                       return -EINVAL;
> +               }
> +
> +               ret = devm_gpio_request(host->dev, gpio, "dw-mci-bus");
> +               if (ret) {
> +                       dev_err(host->dev, "gpio [%d] request failed\n", gpio);
> +                       return -EBUSY;
> +               }
> +       }

This change should not have been there. If the mmc bus setup is being
done using pinctrl framework, this change can be avoided.

Thanks,
Thomas.

> +
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] mmc: host: dw_mmc-exynos: Add support for pinctrl
  2012-12-31  5:57 ` Thomas Abraham
@ 2013-01-03 18:33   ` Dongjin Kim
  2013-01-23  6:08     ` Dongjin Kim
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dongjin Kim @ 2013-01-03 18:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Abraham
  Cc: Chris Ball, Arnd Bergmann, Will Newton, linux-mmc, linux-kernel

Hi Thomas,

Thank you for your reviewing, and
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1870231 works. So this change is
needless.

I had tested with below changes on my hardware.

[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1904431
[2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1920661

Best regards,
Dongjin.

On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Thomas Abraham
<thomas.abraham@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 21 December 2012 09:11, Dongjin Kim <tobetter@gmail.com> wrote:
>> This patch adds support for pin configuration using pinctrl subsystem to
>> dw_mmc-exynos driver. The property 'wp-gpios' can be specified for write
>> protect but 'samsung,cd-pinmux-gpio' and gpios used for clock, command and
>> data lines will be ignored.
>>
>> -. 'pinctrl-0' should specify pin control groups (clock, comand and data
>>     lines) used for this controller.
>> -. 'pinctrl-names' should contain only one value, 'default'.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dongjin Kim <tobetter@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c |   44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
>> index 4d50da6..d1c9963 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
>> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h>
>>  #include <linux/of.h>
>>  #include <linux/of_gpio.h>
>> +#include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h>
>>
>>  #include "dw_mmc.h"
>>  #include "dw_mmc-pltfm.h"
>> @@ -49,6 +50,7 @@ struct dw_mci_exynos_priv_data {
>>         u8                              ciu_div;
>>         u32                             sdr_timing;
>>         u32                             ddr_timing;
>> +       struct pinctrl                  *pctrl;
>>  };
>>
>>  static struct dw_mci_exynos_compatible {
>> @@ -84,6 +86,10 @@ static int dw_mci_exynos_priv_init(struct dw_mci *host)
>>                         priv->ctrl_type = exynos_compat[idx].ctrl_type;
>>         }
>>
>> +       priv->pctrl = devm_pinctrl_get_select_default(host->dev);
>> +       if (IS_ERR(priv->pctrl))
>> +               dev_dbg(host->dev, "no pinctrl node\n");
>> +
>
> This could have been handled in dw_mci_exynos_setup_bus function. And
> we also need to check if this patch gets merged.
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1870231/. If it gets merged, this
> change can be avoided.
>
>>         host->priv = priv;
>>         return 0;
>>  }
>> @@ -149,32 +155,19 @@ static int dw_mci_exynos_parse_dt(struct dw_mci *host)
>>                 return ret;
>>
>>         priv->ddr_timing = SDMMC_CLKSEL_TIMING(timing[0], timing[1], div);
>> +
>>         return 0;
>>  }
>>
>>  static int dw_mci_exynos_setup_bus(struct dw_mci *host,
>>                                 struct device_node *slot_np, u8 bus_width)
>>  {
>> +       struct dw_mci_exynos_priv_data *priv = host->priv;
>>         int idx, gpio, ret;
>>
>>         if (!slot_np)
>>                 return -EINVAL;
>>
>> -       /* cmd + clock + bus-width pins */
>> -       for (idx = 0; idx < NUM_PINS(bus_width); idx++) {
>> -               gpio = of_get_gpio(slot_np, idx);
>> -               if (!gpio_is_valid(gpio)) {
>> -                       dev_err(host->dev, "invalid gpio: %d\n", gpio);
>> -                       return -EINVAL;
>> -               }
>> -
>> -               ret = devm_gpio_request(host->dev, gpio, "dw-mci-bus");
>> -               if (ret) {
>> -                       dev_err(host->dev, "gpio [%d] request failed\n", gpio);
>> -                       return -EBUSY;
>> -               }
>> -       }
>> -
>>         gpio = of_get_named_gpio(slot_np, "wp-gpios", 0);
>>         if (gpio_is_valid(gpio)) {
>>                 if (devm_gpio_request(host->dev, gpio, "dw-mci-wp"))
>> @@ -185,9 +178,12 @@ static int dw_mci_exynos_setup_bus(struct dw_mci *host,
>>                 host->pdata->quirks |= DW_MCI_QUIRK_NO_WRITE_PROTECT;
>>         }
>>
>> -       if (host->pdata->quirks & DW_MCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION)
>> +       if (!IS_ERR(priv->pctrl))
>>                 return 0;
>>
>> +       if (host->pdata->quirks & DW_MCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION)
>> +               goto setup_bus;
>> +
>
> Why do the entire bus setup if card detection is broken?
>
>>         gpio = of_get_named_gpio(slot_np, "samsung,cd-pinmux-gpio", 0);
>>         if (gpio_is_valid(gpio)) {
>>                 if (devm_gpio_request(host->dev, gpio, "dw-mci-cd"))
>> @@ -196,6 +192,22 @@ static int dw_mci_exynos_setup_bus(struct dw_mci *host,
>>                 dev_info(host->dev, "cd gpio not available");
>>         }
>>
>> + setup_bus:
>> +       /* cmd + clock + bus-width pins */
>> +       for (idx = 0; idx < NUM_PINS(bus_width); idx++) {
>> +               gpio = of_get_gpio(slot_np, idx);
>> +               if (!gpio_is_valid(gpio)) {
>> +                       dev_err(host->dev, "invalid gpio: %d\n", gpio);
>> +                       return -EINVAL;
>> +               }
>> +
>> +               ret = devm_gpio_request(host->dev, gpio, "dw-mci-bus");
>> +               if (ret) {
>> +                       dev_err(host->dev, "gpio [%d] request failed\n", gpio);
>> +                       return -EBUSY;
>> +               }
>> +       }
>
> This change should not have been there. If the mmc bus setup is being
> done using pinctrl framework, this change can be avoided.
>
> Thanks,
> Thomas.
>
>> +
>>         return 0;
>>  }
>>
>> --
>> 1.7.9.5
>>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] mmc: host: dw_mmc-exynos: Add support for pinctrl
  2013-01-03 18:33   ` Dongjin Kim
@ 2013-01-23  6:08     ` Dongjin Kim
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Dongjin Kim @ 2013-01-23  6:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Abraham
  Cc: Chris Ball, Arnd Bergmann, Will Newton, linux-mmc, linux-kernel

Hi Thomas,

I have a question regarding the bus setup when I use the patch
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1870231. It configures buses as
defined in "pinctrl-0 = ...".

But in the function dw_mci_exynos_setup_bus(), it tries again to
configure gpios and probing is failed because there is no "gpios =
<...>" property. So I guess bus setup has to be ignored when the gpios
are configured with pinctrl.

What's your advice?

Thank you in advance.
Dongjin.

On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 3:33 AM, Dongjin Kim <tobetter@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Thank you for your reviewing, and
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1870231 works. So this change is
> needless.
>
> I had tested with below changes on my hardware.
>
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1904431
> [2] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1920661
>
> Best regards,
> Dongjin.
>
> On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Thomas Abraham
> <thomas.abraham@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On 21 December 2012 09:11, Dongjin Kim <tobetter@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> This patch adds support for pin configuration using pinctrl subsystem to
>>> dw_mmc-exynos driver. The property 'wp-gpios' can be specified for write
>>> protect but 'samsung,cd-pinmux-gpio' and gpios used for clock, command and
>>> data lines will be ignored.
>>>
>>> -. 'pinctrl-0' should specify pin control groups (clock, comand and data
>>>     lines) used for this controller.
>>> -. 'pinctrl-names' should contain only one value, 'default'.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dongjin Kim <tobetter@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c |   44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>>>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
>>> index 4d50da6..d1c9963 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c
>>> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>>>  #include <linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h>
>>>  #include <linux/of.h>
>>>  #include <linux/of_gpio.h>
>>> +#include <linux/pinctrl/consumer.h>
>>>
>>>  #include "dw_mmc.h"
>>>  #include "dw_mmc-pltfm.h"
>>> @@ -49,6 +50,7 @@ struct dw_mci_exynos_priv_data {
>>>         u8                              ciu_div;
>>>         u32                             sdr_timing;
>>>         u32                             ddr_timing;
>>> +       struct pinctrl                  *pctrl;
>>>  };
>>>
>>>  static struct dw_mci_exynos_compatible {
>>> @@ -84,6 +86,10 @@ static int dw_mci_exynos_priv_init(struct dw_mci *host)
>>>                         priv->ctrl_type = exynos_compat[idx].ctrl_type;
>>>         }
>>>
>>> +       priv->pctrl = devm_pinctrl_get_select_default(host->dev);
>>> +       if (IS_ERR(priv->pctrl))
>>> +               dev_dbg(host->dev, "no pinctrl node\n");
>>> +
>>
>> This could have been handled in dw_mci_exynos_setup_bus function. And
>> we also need to check if this patch gets merged.
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1870231/. If it gets merged, this
>> change can be avoided.
>>
>>>         host->priv = priv;
>>>         return 0;
>>>  }
>>> @@ -149,32 +155,19 @@ static int dw_mci_exynos_parse_dt(struct dw_mci *host)
>>>                 return ret;
>>>
>>>         priv->ddr_timing = SDMMC_CLKSEL_TIMING(timing[0], timing[1], div);
>>> +
>>>         return 0;
>>>  }
>>>
>>>  static int dw_mci_exynos_setup_bus(struct dw_mci *host,
>>>                                 struct device_node *slot_np, u8 bus_width)
>>>  {
>>> +       struct dw_mci_exynos_priv_data *priv = host->priv;
>>>         int idx, gpio, ret;
>>>
>>>         if (!slot_np)
>>>                 return -EINVAL;
>>>
>>> -       /* cmd + clock + bus-width pins */
>>> -       for (idx = 0; idx < NUM_PINS(bus_width); idx++) {
>>> -               gpio = of_get_gpio(slot_np, idx);
>>> -               if (!gpio_is_valid(gpio)) {
>>> -                       dev_err(host->dev, "invalid gpio: %d\n", gpio);
>>> -                       return -EINVAL;
>>> -               }
>>> -
>>> -               ret = devm_gpio_request(host->dev, gpio, "dw-mci-bus");
>>> -               if (ret) {
>>> -                       dev_err(host->dev, "gpio [%d] request failed\n", gpio);
>>> -                       return -EBUSY;
>>> -               }
>>> -       }
>>> -
>>>         gpio = of_get_named_gpio(slot_np, "wp-gpios", 0);
>>>         if (gpio_is_valid(gpio)) {
>>>                 if (devm_gpio_request(host->dev, gpio, "dw-mci-wp"))
>>> @@ -185,9 +178,12 @@ static int dw_mci_exynos_setup_bus(struct dw_mci *host,
>>>                 host->pdata->quirks |= DW_MCI_QUIRK_NO_WRITE_PROTECT;
>>>         }
>>>
>>> -       if (host->pdata->quirks & DW_MCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION)
>>> +       if (!IS_ERR(priv->pctrl))
>>>                 return 0;
>>>
>>> +       if (host->pdata->quirks & DW_MCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION)
>>> +               goto setup_bus;
>>> +
>>
>> Why do the entire bus setup if card detection is broken?
>>
>>>         gpio = of_get_named_gpio(slot_np, "samsung,cd-pinmux-gpio", 0);
>>>         if (gpio_is_valid(gpio)) {
>>>                 if (devm_gpio_request(host->dev, gpio, "dw-mci-cd"))
>>> @@ -196,6 +192,22 @@ static int dw_mci_exynos_setup_bus(struct dw_mci *host,
>>>                 dev_info(host->dev, "cd gpio not available");
>>>         }
>>>
>>> + setup_bus:
>>> +       /* cmd + clock + bus-width pins */
>>> +       for (idx = 0; idx < NUM_PINS(bus_width); idx++) {
>>> +               gpio = of_get_gpio(slot_np, idx);
>>> +               if (!gpio_is_valid(gpio)) {
>>> +                       dev_err(host->dev, "invalid gpio: %d\n", gpio);
>>> +                       return -EINVAL;
>>> +               }
>>> +
>>> +               ret = devm_gpio_request(host->dev, gpio, "dw-mci-bus");
>>> +               if (ret) {
>>> +                       dev_err(host->dev, "gpio [%d] request failed\n", gpio);
>>> +                       return -EBUSY;
>>> +               }
>>> +       }
>>
>> This change should not have been there. If the mmc bus setup is being
>> done using pinctrl framework, this change can be avoided.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Thomas.
>>
>>> +
>>>         return 0;
>>>  }
>>>
>>> --
>>> 1.7.9.5
>>>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-01-23  6:08 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-12-21 17:11 [PATCH] mmc: host: dw_mmc-exynos: Add support for pinctrl Dongjin Kim
2012-12-31  2:59 ` Dongjin Kim
2012-12-31  5:57 ` Thomas Abraham
2013-01-03 18:33   ` Dongjin Kim
2013-01-23  6:08     ` Dongjin Kim

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).